Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

40 replies

pawb.social

I'd be rather disappointed when he turned human, I imagine. Not what I was signing up for at all.

75
lemmy.world

Yeah, I remember watching that and was thinking, “now this guy’s just some schlub with no redeeming characteristics, change him back dammit.”

26

There was an interview with Emma Watson around the live action movie release where she commented along those lines. Something to the effect of, "It's sad in a way when he becomes human. I was just thinking, 'You were quite nice before, actually', you know?"

26

dragging his ass back to the witch that cursed him

excuse me ma'am could we get the same one again please

5
lemmy.world

It also adds some new flavor to the reason why when Gaston picked up one of her books and he started twisting it around left and right to try to make sense of it.

I can only imagine what was going through his mind.

28
lemmy.today

(Un?)fortunately for him, it was a corrupted coloring book. Maybe it awakened something within him?

4
lemmy.world

It’s beast-iality, definitely, but he’s an intelligent adult and can clearly communicate his desires, so it’s closer to xenophilia (meaning actual extraterrestrials, not just humans from other cultures)

32
testauser1reply
lemmy.world

Yep. Scooby and Velma totally kosher for the same reason

17
lemmy.world

Theoretically, sure, but that’s pretty fucked up to do to shaggy

20
sh.itjust.works

Velma is canonically a lesbian in several versions and Shaggy is unironically capable of getting with many women. Seriously Shaggy the chick magnet is canon.

3

It’s shaggy and scooby…

Velma and Daphne are together, but that’s an open relationship, so it’s not a problem for Daphne.

3
minorkeysreply
sh.itjust.works

Its anthropomorphic fetishizing of animals. That they would still fuck a dog as long at its human enough, is revolting.

-10
pawb.social

I believe bestiality is wrong, solely because animals can't consent, and for no other reason. In a hypothetical scenario where the specific animal in question can consent, you still believe bestiality is wrong, so clearly you have another reason. Why? What is that reason?

And you better not say "because it's disgusting"

1

Oh what's that? Because you personally find it disgusting? How'd I know you were gonna say that?

Well I've got news for you about your personal opinions and the ethics of insisting that other people conform to them.

A lot of kink is disgusting to most people. That doesn't make it unethical. If someone likes getting peed on, or tasered, or verbally degraded because of their race (all things I've met people who are turned on by!), and they have a way to communicate to the person doing those things to them that they're not having fun anymore and want it to stop, and that person actually does stop, and does so immediately, there's no harm done.

No furry, no matter how depraved (and fewer furries than you'd think are horny for animal characters at all, much less quadrupedal ones), will ever actually fuck a dog, because real animals cannot consent and we know that. Furries who do actually fuck dogs get disavowed by the entire rest of the fandom almost immediately (see Hypnotist Sappho). This scenario is therefore entirely hypothetical, and if it's still morally wrong to you and you don't have an answer as to why, I think you have some work to do regarding prejudice.

1

I doubt its just one gender that wants to bang non-humans

8

I don't need to click the link, I know exactly what this is, and I fully approve.

2
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Gentle reminder that not everything is about sex. It's totally fine to fall in love with someone or even be married to them workout having sex.

5
Psythikreply
lemmy.world

Nah that's just what the asexuals want you to believe

3

You reached the end