Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

54 replies

Oh NOW you care about stealing intellectual property!

Fuck off. What's good for the goose is good for the gander, AI assholes.

28

I couldn't care less. Just make cheaper products with near or on par performance and you're okay in my book.

27
lemmy.zip

Samsung uses monopoly tactics and government support to bankrupt smaller companies and then raise prices. They're scum.

RAM is so important to the world economy that their patents should be made public.

78

Computer components being privatized is almost as stupid as privatizing grain in the 1500s. Sure, there are alternatives, but... Are there?

14
feddit.org

When companies are not able to produce enough to satisfy demand and are actively stopping selling to certain sectors and harming them, they should lose their patents. RAM companies are actively harming all of us by selling their products to the AI companies and leaving us all without RAM, so we should encourage alternatives.

170
lemmy.nz

Because that would be something Jesus would approve of and we can't allow that

48

Of course Jesus is all about the supply side; there's less and less demand for him.

3

It is. It's called Compulsory Licensing.

There is also an FDA Shortage list (most countries have a similar list).
A drug on that list gives the government additional powers to allow companies to work around the parents.

I think this is why there has been so many "off-brand" weight loss drugs recently. Novo Nordisk had supply chain issues with semaglutide, triggering governments to allow other manufacturers

16

The Gates Foundation had strong objections to releasing the covid-19 patents. I'm sure they had some sort of rationale that wasn't "this would set a bad precedent for M$ patents.

22
M137reply
lemmy.today

Oh look, 'Murica brain...
It's a common thing in a lot of the world. I've been on many medications throughout the years and all of them have had several options at each of the several drug store companies, and the default is always the cheapest. They always ask "are you ok with another brand?" if there's a cheaper one than the one written on the prescription.

4
lemmy.nz

So patents are stopping the whole market competition thing, like what how capitalism is supposed to work and all that.

29
Amju Wolfreply
pawb.social

There should be a ceiling with patents, where if you make 10x back of what it cost your r&d (or whatever 5x of your yearly revenue), the patent should just be considered expired no matter how much time passed.

It should never be an infinite source of money.

29

Seems like a good idea, but would probably just result in Hollywood accounting so that they never actually make any profit on paper.

12

Patents in the US only last 20 years on stuff like this, the problem is that lawyers are crafty. So they will patent the formula and then 20 years later the delivery method or something like that. Thus preventing generics for longer than they should be able to.

8

Only way how capitalism works is that the rich are just becoming the richer by exploiting the poor(er).

10
ryperreply
lemmy.ca

OK, but the leak in the article seems to have been in 2016 when conditions were very different.

9

When companies are not able to produce enough to satisfy demand and are actively stopping selling to certain sectors and harming them, they should lose their patents.

Except they stop selling to certain sectors because these sectors pay less. I am pretty sure that if a laptop maker ask to buy the RAM at a 50% higher price than AI companies, the RAM producer will happily sell to them.

RAM companies are actively harming all of us by selling their products to the AI companies and leaving us all without RAM, so we should encourage alternatives.

And how do you plan to keep these alternatives from selling to the higher bidder, which will probably be a AI company ?

1

US frontier AI companies steal petabytes of copyrighted material.

Oh shucks 😂

129
mander.xyz

Oh no! RAM prices might go down! Won't somebody think of the poor shareholders?

83

We need to stop them from stealing 1 corporations IP, so tech corporations can continue making monopoly money off the entire human species stolen IP!

19

In a better world, all of these technologies that get stolen by various corpo espionage and reverse engineering teams would be freely shared with the world so everyone can benefit from them, and people not in the dev teams might have improvements they can suggest.

But instead we have a bunch of rich adult children who would rather take the ball and go home because they don't think they've recieved enough praise for bringing it, and wanting to charge everyone just to look at it.

It's not a great metaphor, but honestly dealing with companies and governments feels a lot like dealing with children you aren't allowed to discipline or even talk sternly to because their parents have forbidden you from interfering.

43
ladiciusreply
lemmy.world

You mean 40 years of delay for the destruction of our biosphere?

I'd call that a win.

-6
lemmy.world

40 years of burning far more coal than necessary due to inefficient engines

Whether the overall effect was positive or negative with respect to the biome, no clue

29
jdrreply
lemmy.ml

Yes, but also induced demand. More efficient engines means less coal per task, but more tasks, maybe so many more that total coal use increases.

2

That's why I said we don't know the overall effect on the biome due to less efficient engines

With how quickly we industrialized, my intuition is we were mining and burning it as fast as possible, but maybe more efficient engines could have let us mine and burn even more

10

Let's not forget that mega corpos benefit heavily from government subsidized R&D in universities, insert themselves within the R&D and claim innovation as their own.

Tech is built on FOSS and private corporations act like they invented butter.

10

The thing is that with the current laws, even if China would open source all the info they have gathered, companies in other countries couldn't use it.

2

Guessing they won’t get much in the way of public sympathy given they’re bending consumers over the barrel. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

36
lemmy.zip

Proving all this in court could give Samsung a powerful weapon moving forward. Legal experts believe the company might take sworn statements straight to the US International Trade Commission, a body with the authority to block foreign products from entering the country entirely.

Which does not help because not every country will ban them and The other manufacturers will then have less demand and therefore have to reduce their prices in order to continue selling the same amount

Edit: Doing so may slow the rate of the price decline in the US, but it will not stop it.

30
cørereply
leminal.space

Lol The US will block Chinese RAM from being sold in the US. I'm sure China is super scared.

34

Oh nooooo China will have to.....wait what will they have to do?

28
lemmy.zip

But if China proves that US did industry spionage, what happens then?

16