Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.sdf.org

30 replies

pmjvreply
lemmy.sdf.org

I mean.. you can always touch it to correct something that ends up being really bad. This usually happens with the eyeballs in my case - after i convert it to black, i sometimes have to erase the extra black from the irises. I didn't do it here so that it's obvious as to what happened.

That being said, you can build your whole personality and style about the seemingly 'wrong' lines :')

4
SomGyereply
sh.itjust.works

That is absolutely true, and when I drew art I was huge on colors and contrast and kind of intentionally breaking the “rules” since I was shit at following them 😅

2
pmjvreply
lemmy.sdf.org

now we have to compete with sentient machines that can't comprehend the idea of something looking bad, it's tricky!

2

A lot of times the best path to “good” or decent is directly all the “bad” and messy paths anyways! The competition is cold and fierce indeed 😩

2

It could be seen as ablest or inclusive, really. I think what they're getting at is you don't need a steady hand, literally anyone could draw this way. This style opens up opportunities for people to draw, who may have felt that ability was lost to them. The name certainly gets to the point quickly and concisely. I don't know if naming the style anything else would portray that same level of explanation. Well at least, I just can't think of anything that would similarly portray the accessibility of the style.

3

You reached the end

the parkinson's faux layer method | Spyke