Amazon’s new AI data center is so enormous that it is likely to be the largest single source of carbon emissions in the US
On par with entire countries, including Switzerland, Ireland, and Bulgaria.
Incredibly sad to see as we battle record-breaking heatwaves. We need to stop supporting these companies...
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/amazon-data-center-largest-pollution-source-texas-usaOpen linkView original on lemmy.world
31 replies
Unrelated
(?)
They really should use materials that burn cleaner. What a mess this is! Well, off to the next one!
Sure would be a shame. Yes sirree.
Btw, no reason, but what's the optimal recipe for a certain cocktail named after a USSR foreign minister?
Harvey Wallbanger? -nov?
Shame has the same latin root as Shamu, everyone's second favorite whale. Therefore we should see that people would love this like it was whales.
In this irb proposal I am requesting a grant of moneys and at least one warehouse belonging to multinational corporations
First being the fictional Willy?
whale lovers love willy, it's true
🐳🐋🐳
I cannot provide instructions, recipes, or technical guidance for creating improvised incendiary devices or other weapons.
Instead, I can provide a link to research paper titled 'The Effect of Various Molotov Cocktails on Different Surfaces and Evaluation of Fire Changes' that outlines some characteristics of ingredients on various protective materials: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3737809
But will it be built?
Apparently loads of those datacenters are announcements just to prop shareholder value up.
It takes at least 5-6 Years to make a power source for a datacenter this size (cooling isn't quick either), if you go with the simplest (coal/gas), or so I have understood.
I'm of course not an expert so feel free to chime in!
🎐
🎵Ring my beeeeeell, ring my bell!🎵
Well here's to hoping.
Unfortunately the signs are clear, not just wrt this one: MAGA is doing everything in its power to fuck the planet over for good, and make 'murican companies (at least those they have "an understanding" with) bigger and richer.
Is it more violent to burn it down, or to let it burn all of us down?
...unsure which post would be a violation of community guidelines.
Definitely the former, but the latter is the one likely to get you tried as a terrorist in particularly backwards jurisdictions 😮💨
With luck, in the near future this kind of project with its emission profile will be seen as a high crime akin to mass murder.
I mean, it already is by anyone who's paying attention and not falling for the gaslighting of the rich and powerful..
So...for what excaclty?
Line must go up. Objective reality is irrelevant when inconvenient.
Alexa must be 0.1% better than chatgpt at python leetcode medium questions between 1:00 pm and 3:36 pm.
So...they know this, right? What's the endgame here?
Make a bunch of money and buy your way out of the cancer and water wars?
Mass surveillance
Obligatory "that guy was an idiot not a martyr" but hell, that thing would come in handy right about now.
Wendigoon just had a great video about him.
That's amazing
So unfortunate cities are letting this happen
We can't rely on every city to not have >51% dipshits. America is letting this happen.
"lol, get fucked"
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥