Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world
dataisbeautiful·Data is Beautifulbyjaykrown

The main culprit behind deforestation on the planet isn't paper or timber. It accounts for 41% of all losses

The main driver of deforestation has always been the expansion of farmland. A recent study published in Nature Food by Chandrakant Singh and Martin Persson shows which products, specifically, have driven the process in recent decades. The clear leader was beef production, which accounted for 41% of total deforestation. Second came oilseeds (mainly soy and palm oil), followed by artificial forest plantations and cereals.

The forest loss is tightly tied to specific regions. More than half of the clearing for pasture happened in Brazil and its Latin American neighbors, while almost all the world's demand for palm oil is met at the expense of the forests of Indonesia and Malaysia. Forest plantations became the main factor in the US, Canada, China and other parts of Asia, whereas in Africa the chief culprits of loss were cereals, roots and tubers, and cash crops like coffee, cocoa, fruits and nuts.

The scale of the problem is hard to grasp, yet the data shows that change is real. In places, international campaigns and regulation have worked, for instance, the pace of clearing for palm oil in Southeast Asia has been slowed. But to pull off the same trick with the rest of the agricultural sector, we'll have to pin down exactly which capital, and at which precise points on the planet, is putting forest to the blade.

View original on lemmy.world
52

11 replies

reddig33reply
lemmy.world

It’s stupid because we have tons of open prairie in the US and elsewhere, but the world cuts down the Amazon to raise cattle on that land instead. And then puts it on a ship or a boat or a train to send it halfway around the world. 🙄

9

Indeed, it's an extreme human-caused inefficiency. Primarily due to terrible legislation and decision making. Capitalism has allowed for the exclusion of external costs, thus we are headed towards climate disaster. No one pays for the methane they release into the atmosphere which kills someone in a heat wave, it's a flawed system at the core.

0

I rarely do, and when I do is Danish beef (I am in the EU). That said, that is not at all what you should get from the article. You should not buy Latin American beef, and you should consume way less chocolate, coffee, and fruits and nuts that are not in season and/or local.

Switching to tea (good tea, not the bagged shit), is probably my biggest contribution to saving the planet, since the environmental impact is less than a third of the coffee production both in terms of energy, fuel for transport per portion and water consumption for the crops.

3
TIEPilotreply
lemmy.world

Why, buy local and don't buy meat from anywhere else. Problem solved.

I've been to Haiti and the Dominican Republic. Same island and two very different ways to do land management. If Brasil wants to destroy their country thats their business. I don't like it but who are we to tell others how to run...

-2
TIEPilotreply
lemmy.world

No shit, now get china and india on board and shit might change...

0
jaykrownreply
lemmy.world

I don't give a shit about what they do, this all comes down to a personal decision level.

-4
TIEPilotreply
lemmy.world

So what you posted doesn't matter as and I quote:

"I don't give a shit about what they do"

So why make the post? Don't eat beef, good for you I guess, but why shit on everyone that does?

1
jaykrownreply
lemmy.world

To remind myself that I'm not the problem I think.

-5

You reached the end