Many early Nazi's were also paradoxically Zionist. They believed that the best way to get rid of the Jewish people was to just send them all somewhere else, and a Jewish state would be an easy place to convince them to go.
It was called "the Final Solution" because Germany had exhausted all other options in trying to deport their Jewish population. No one, especially the US, wanted to accept Jewish refugees en masse.
Did they? I thought they're contribution to both wars was about even in that they really didn't do much.
They spent WWI running into Austrian machine guns for almost no gain, much like the rest of Europe. And WWII they seem to just have fucked around in North Africa for a while until the allies kicked them out and invaded them.
I don't think either war would have really turned out differently if Italy had just remained neutral
There's a good chance Hitler would have won if he hadn't wasted so much time and military assets in North Africa, Southeast Europe and Italy. He would have faced an even larger fraction of the British navy but Germany's navy was already hopelessly outclassed as it was.
14 replies
Host country is also run by Nazis
They have learned from their mistakes though, and are now really supportive of the
JewishZionist cause.Only the rich and powerful pedos though. The ones part of the in-group.
Imagine they'd find a poor brown one, or merely accused one of being a pedo... all hell would be unleashed.
Justice Thomas is still available last I checked.
Many early Nazi's were also paradoxically Zionist. They believed that the best way to get rid of the Jewish people was to just send them all somewhere else, and a Jewish state would be an easy place to convince them to go.
It was called "the Final Solution" because Germany had exhausted all other options in trying to deport their Jewish population. No one, especially the US, wanted to accept Jewish refugees en masse.
And none of the citizens are even aware of the carnage going down. Is this post about a soccer game?
Americans are aware and don’t care, same as the Germans were
Ah yes, I remember when Paraguay marched on Berlin...
And Italy did show up in 1939. They did not in 1914.
Did they? I thought they're contribution to both wars was about even in that they really didn't do much.
They spent WWI running into Austrian machine guns for almost no gain, much like the rest of Europe. And WWII they seem to just have fucked around in North Africa for a while until the allies kicked them out and invaded them.
I don't think either war would have really turned out differently if Italy had just remained neutral
There's a good chance Hitler would have won if he hadn't wasted so much time and military assets in North Africa, Southeast Europe and Italy. He would have faced an even larger fraction of the British navy but Germany's navy was already hopelessly outclassed as it was.
I'm sure there's a joke in there about Paraguay being on the receiving end of a lot of Nazis fleeing to South America after WW2.
Us Aussies bouta prove a point