Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.ca

19 replies

There would be absolutely zero pushback if Steam mandated a disclosure of what game engine the game used or what modelling program the models were made with.

But suddenly it's a huge deal when they have to disclose if they've used a fraud-funded plagiarism machine. Hmm, wonder why.

103
Avareply
piefed.blahaj.zone

I'd probably push back on requiring model disclosure. Tons of games use purchased assets, and a full accounting of all the relevant software in that chain seems challenging. Additionally, any user-generated content is going to be very difficult to audit for similar reasons.

Meanwhile, it seems like this would make for a relatively easy way for spiteful individuals to attack developers for "failure to accurately disclose" sorts of things.

5
sopuli.xyz

Tim Sweeney is such a little pissdrinker.

74

I never met a Tim in my life before, that is worst than this manifestation of Tim. So from my personal experience, I agree with your statement.

3

cant believe the guy who is placing a big emphasis on the AI integration features in Unreal Engine 6 would be upset about devs needing to disclose if they used AI or not

45
lemmy.ml

It's the Streisand effect. Microsoft felt it too: "Don't call it slop" the web now calls it "Microslop". Tim doesn't want the disclosure to be seen, so what does the web do? Off course they develop a plugin to make the disclosure even bigger. This is how things are done in real world. Tim is a baby and does not know how reality works. :-)

34

First half of the headline implies legitimate criticism. But considering Sweeney's history, I think it would be easy to expect it to be an agenda of attacking Valve however he can.

5

You reached the end

As Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney blasts Valve over Steam AI disclosures, dev makes those disclosures even more noticeable and hides AI-aided games in search results | Spyke