Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.dbzer0.com

46 replies

Gonzakoreply
lemmy.world

I'll be honest. I am pretty curious about trying pegging. Just no cutie has risen up to the challenge

24
Gonzakoreply
lemmy.world

Nah, no interest. I'd have to be in a certain headspace and that doesn't come up alone.

16
Gonzakoreply
lemmy.world

Haven't tried them out of self-preservation. I fall too easily onto addiction

9

Least addictive drug. Impossible to do more than once a week and feel the effects. Big laughs, deep introspection. Anti addiction, proven to let the brain open up neural paths

4
lemmy.world

you can't get addicted to shrooms you will grow from taking shrooms

3

If you take one shroom you grow. If you take two, you can shoot fireballs. And if you get injured you become short again. An Italian plumber told me that once.

4

My mind is set. I'll never ingest any psychedelics, seen what they do.

3

Theres been studies on how they can help with addiction, iirc. But don't take that as a reason to try, especially without access to the supervision I think these studies included. Lots of interesting and promising research still to do on them imo tho

2

I heard from a sovereign citizen that prostate stuff doesn't count if your butt has a gold fringe border.

27

I heard about a an undercover CIA agents using deep fried onion rings to emulate that.

7

Well everyone can rest easy, the shitpost certification team has certified this shitpost. Its now an official Shitpost (tm) (r)

3
lemmy.blahaj.zone

In other words, "Some anarchists still have their inner ProState they have to overcome".

12

MLs when their gut flora doing all the labour of actually breaking down the food to be absorbed isn't centrally planned but blooms and dies depending on the diet and the available nutrients. (They have to fart a lot)

8
lemmy.cafe

The tolerant left when they discover they're lactose intolerant (they spent the last 5 hours shitting their brains out)

5
piefed.social

AFAB really feels like a regressive term, like we’re re-segregating folks into out groups.

Idk.

If trans women are women then why do we need AFAB to differentiate. How is this not just moving the differentiator from the set of naughty bits to the words used to describe the naughty bits you were born with, and then how is that different than gender?

I guess I’m an old.

11
lemmy.ca

Because in this case it's relevant as they won't have the organ in question

18

Right or wrong, I think of AMAB / AFAB as medical terms.

While I'm willing to amend my position on these terms, there is a need for a non-judgemental medical term due to things like this.

10
aliceitcreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

I guess I’m an old.

No, you're right: afab and amab should only be used in contexts in which it is actually important information. E.g. medical. In all other cases it is unnecessary.

9
aliceitcreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

But that's not what the original comment wrote. The presence of a prostate might be relevant, the assigned gender at birth is not.

3
lemmy.ca

Don't worry there's an easy way to get rid of it .... cancer

5

You reached the end