Spyke

Really just yelling the quiet part to the nosebleeds, aren’t they?

It was never about helping their constituents. The moment someone outside of their inner circle becomes popular, the facade drops and it’s all about voting ‘correctly’ and the popular person ‘stealing’ the vote.

At least they pretended to not be vicious ghouls who don’t care about actual humans when they skipped over Bernie to hand the election to Trump.

10
slrpnk.net

You already did, by refusing to listen to constituents. They’ve taken over, and that’s good.

16

"...Let them take over the party?"

We ARE the party. We've been the party.

Imbeciles.

5

Democratic elections happening and selecting candidates that aren't from your carefully prepared inner circle? Unbelievable! It was the their turn?!!

Guards!! GUARDS!!!

48

Let them take over? You must not be familiar with how a republic works.

41

Ideally? Yes! This needed to happen when the Tea Party took over the Republicans, it's long overdue!

20

Watch there be a record low voter turn out this year as moderates don't want to vote for communists and left-wings are upset because the progressive candidate in general isn't the exact flavor of manic socialist dream politician that they wanted.

0
piefed.world

Yeah you have a party that actively hates us, our friends, our country and democracy itself and another one that isn't perfect so let's burn down the whole motherfucker right?

4
Zaktorreply
sopuli.xyz

It would be pretty absurd for centrists to see that choice and refuse to vote for the not perfect party, wouldn't it?

That's the comeuppance your first comment was fantasizing about isn't it?

1

You reached the end

House Democrats’ anxiety rises after wins by Mamdani-backed candidates: ‘Are we going to let them take over the party?’ | Spyke