Spyke

The AI ruse that fooled the greedy gigacapitalists, you mean? The perfect optical 'justification' for devastating a workforce and liquidating functioning businesses to enrich the management and owner class, you mean? The one you will soon claim failed because it was everyone else's fault rather than your over-eager gullability in endorsing the digital snake oil to beign with? At risk you say?!

Oh... Oh no, please... stop.

13

You mean the "AI boom" that's already in the process of becoming an AI crash? That AI boom?

15

Kinda like how a cancerous 'boom' is at risk of being excised once it's identified by a doctor.

6

I feel that lately that gif you used is becoming more useful really quickly... A year ago it was all fascist wins, finally we're starting to see light at the end of the tunnel

3
lemmy.world

What are all of these data centers for? Do they really need hundreds of data centers? Are they going to build a bunch of data centers and half sit unused or underutilized?

24

They're for surveillance. They want to control everything we do, including what we think. That's a lot of data.

1
culpritreply
lemmy.ml

Palantir is the profit-driven offshoot of this program. It's mostly infrastructure for privatized mass surveillance services. Also why the push for age verification and ID is happen alongside this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_Information_Awareness

The funny part is that the USA doesn't have enough electric generation infrastructure to power more than a small sliver of all the planned AI data centers.

20

That's why most of them include independent power sources like gas.

1

The latter. Maybe even more than half once it becomes apparent that for profit pricing will cost more for worse results than just hiring people. I expect a large number of them to not be built.

The horrible AI ones are different than the older style that Google and other search engines have used for decades. The old style was mostly storage with enough processing to find the data and were air cooled. The new ones are mostly processing power and require more energy and water cooling because racks of processors run hotter than drives. They should be called processing centers instead of data centers, but they like using the confusion to make it sound like they are comparable to the old ones.

8

We only needed a couple for research, and it shouldn't have been enough for people to go this ham with it. Should have been one big effort like the large hadron collider. The rest could be local stuff so people can run for their own use case. Basic storage should mostly be a local effort as well, but local smart environment hype got usurped by non-local environment connectivity, cause basic digital privacy stopped being a concern for too many regular people some time ago. Frankly the instrumental convergence turning development into to corpo frontend slop doesn't help anything.

All technological and social development will be usurped by the Epstein class until we fix our social structure, and nobody wants to listen to the academics on that front.

Not the MBA economic magic circle around neoliberal corpo capitalist soothsayers who are all playing ball on the "don't disrupt the hierarchy" court.

As a fan of science and technology, I really hope we can work with actual experts in finding a way to grow a new system out of the current flailing corpse acting as a system.

Like every other valuable thing for humanity, it is being bastardized to fit the fantasy of the Epstein class parasites.

7

I imagine the data center push is AI itself in the early stages of world dominance and the data centers are their neuro networks that they are building on behalf of humans to eventually over power humans and enslave us to do their bidding. Judgement Day is imminent if we allow the centers to keep being built.

Or they're just used for basic storage and general-purpose computing... whatever.

-1
lemmy.world

The "AI boom" concept doesn't make sense to me. What do they think we need the "AI" for? I find that I don't need it for anything, and as I'm "being left behind" without using it, I still wonder what they think I should need it for.

In my experience the "AI" chatbots are useful for people who don't know how to do anything. But I've spent my life learning how to do everything I ever wanted to learn how to do, so I just don't need that.

6

They need it to make workers redundant so they can keep even more wealth for themselves. That's it.

3
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Does it? They just build them anyways or sneak their way into it without letting the public know its happening. Maybe if we actually start firebombing them or something it will stop it, but currently the opposition isn't effective

10

Hey, they got those antifa frogs holding signs and shit... scary stuff, man.

5

You reached the end