Spyke
lemmy.world

I second the recommendation for Bitwarden.

I switched over from Dashlane and never looked back. They even have a browser extension for mobile Firefox (the browser you should be using anyways) so it's easy and convenient on all my devices.

123
johnthedoereply
lemmy.ml

+1 for Bitwarden. There were growing pains at the start to move off of iCloud Keychain. Once done and being more proactive with managing passwords it’s so good and trustworthy

41

Agreed. Bitwarden has been fantastic. I just wish it was easier to swap between accounts on the browser extension. You can do it on desktop and mobile pretty easily.

14
lemmy.world

Is there another way than just going back and forth and manually putting them in?

3

Manually putting what in?

You can import from another service if that's what you mean

3

First time using it you export your password data and move it into BW. Then browser extension can help auto fill and detect new ones. It also has a password generator built in so that’s handy

Phone app can integrate and auto fill. On iPhone I’m not sure it if can detect and save. But the few times I’ve needed to sign up on phone I manually input.

I still use Firefox password and iCloud saves when prompted. Doesn’t hurt to have a backup I suppose.

2

I spent some time when I migrated from just storing my passwords in Chrome. I went through and made sure all of them were strong, unique passwords. I set up categories for all of them. I set it up so I could share the right ones with the family and whatnot.

Doing the raw import is easy, but it was a good time to make sure everything was in order.

1
Otterreply
lemmy.ca

Is there a reason to use the mobile extension over the app itself? The app can input into other apps as well

14
Plagiatusreply
lemmy.world

Don't know honestly - I've never tried the app so I don't have a comparison. Didn't even know they had one.

1

The app is nice if you want to use bitwarden to login to other appa. You can allow it permission to run alongside other apps that can fill in login forms.

2

The desktop application runs on Chromium, so that’s something to consider.

1
SatyrSackreply
lemmy.one

I have never even got the mobile extension to work. When I set it up and enter in my email and master password, the Captcha that is supposed go show up is missing entirely. There is just a blank space under the password field where the Captcha is supposed to have appeared.

1
lemmy.world

Been using KeePassXC (and before that, KeePassX) since I abandoned LastPass about a decade ago. The apps integrate with Nextcloud perfectly and at least for me, it's a breeze. I use it for TOTP too, and I second the recommendation of a hardware token for an additional layer of security. There are some USBc options that work on phones (I'm using a pixel 7 pro).

58

yup, no need to pay for a password manager. and far more secure.

16
lemmy.world

I never got YubiKey to work on desktop with it. Key files seem to work good enough and easy to manage.

5
Rootiestreply
lemm.ee

YubiKey works for me, both on desktop with KeePassXC and on Android with KeePassDX to the same DB

6
chockblockreply
lemmy.world

I like the look of KeePassDX but I was bothered by the fact that I have to use the yubikey every single time to unlock the database, unlike keepass2android which allows me to store the yubikey credential with biometric lock until the phone restarts. Keepass2android is not as nice of an app but that feature was really required for me.

3
Rootiestreply
lemm.ee

KeepPassXC can do this as well, but it does require the yubikey to be inserted every time you want to save a change to the database.

Look under Settings -> Security -> Convenience -> Enable database quick unlock (Touch ID/Windows Hello)

Using that I can quick-unlock my database using my laptop's fingerprint scanner, just like how KeepPassDX works on Android.

3
chockblockreply
lemmy.world

its not a huge issue on KeePassXC because I keep a yubikey nano plugged into my laptop, but for my phone, I haven't been able to make this work reliably with KeePassDX. I'll have to give it another go.

3

Ah yeah you are right, it makes me tap my key every time I open the app.

The biometrics seem to only replace the master password.

I do wish it worked more like KeePassXC where the key is only needed to save the database after unlocking and confirming with fingerprint

2

It does require some configuration within yubikey manager. I did not find it straightforward but once set up its really reliable.

4
FlumPHPreply
programming.dev

I'm curious about using the same store for passwords and TOTP. Technically if someone gets screwed to your database, they have both your factors, yes? But I guess it does thwart someone trying to brute force your password.

2
lemmy.world

Adding a hardware key, like Nitrokey, would be an additional level of safety there. I would not use the database without some kind of additional key (something you know and something you physically have).

If there's something nefarious that has user access, you've already lost in that regard.

3
mirrorsreply
lemmy.one

Just to add, you can also use multiple databases to help maintain separation

3

This is what I do: I have 3 KeepassXC databases (regular passwords, "security" questions, TOTP tokens) each with a different password.

2

Technically you do lose the second factor, but nowadays 2FA is often mandatory or they force some crap like SMS/email verification onto you. If you are aware of the risk then it isn't a huge deal.

Though you might want to consider not using it at least for the most important stuff like banking (here you don't even have an option; banks have their own 2FA apps that you have to use) and primary/recovery email.

1
kbin.social

when lastpass screwed around with it's free tier offering, i switched to bitwarden and haven't felt any reason to use or even try anything else, it's rock solid

51
mub
lemmy.ml

Bitwarden - does everything, and is free. You can even setup a shared vault so 2 people can have access to shared stuff like online shopping and streaming sites. Takes a bit of admin work but it is not hard.

37
lemdro.id

Sadly that second but requires the other person to care enough to make an account and not just text you when they need the password 😂

8
Rev3rzereply
lemdit.com

Just send a photograph of your screen showing the requested password of 25 random characters so they have to type it out. Guaranteed their next question will be where they sign up for an account.

1

lol that's generally what I do. Sometimes I'm nice enough to copy and paste. We don't share a lot of accounts so it's not a huge issue.

1
lemmy.ca

Proton Pass pisses me off. Proton is such a money grubbing company that takes FOREVER to release stuff.

I pay $120 per year for ProtonMail, and they want me to pay $180 to unlock the full Proton Pass. $60 per year, for something that BitWarden does for only $12 per year.

Not to mention you'll be waiting years for apps to come out. They're such a fragmented company. The Android remake is already so far past the estimated release date it's sad. Proton Drive Windows app finally came out, but fuck Mac and Linux users, I guess.

BitWarden is available for Windows, Linux, Mac, 9 browsers, iOS, Android, and CLI. - Premium is $1/month.

ProtonPass is available for iOS, Android, and 4 browsers. - Premium is $5/month.

Can't wait for Proton to release a few more half baked services with outdated apps and a promise to update them in a year, but then 3 years later there's still radio silence. Perhaps use your paid services money for developing in a timely manner? Holy shit.

28
Polarreply
lemmy.ca

Well ya, but I'm not American, so it's not $10 for me.

1
Polarreply
lemmy.ca

That's because Euro and USD are similar. That's how currency works. It's not $10 where I live lol.

1

Also why would someone who want enhanced privacy put all their eggs in the basket by trapping themself in Proton's ecosystem. Compartmentalize is important, and it ends up being cheaper too. Proton's pricing is cutthroat.

4

I agree with the fragmented part. Even their apps have different unlock interfaces, like they're each made by a different company

2
workerONEreply
lemmy.world

I'm using proton mail for free, paying like $12 a year for proton pass.

2

That's interesting. Looks like I received an email to get 75% off and I signed up using that

1

Not the point.

Paying for something is great. Not allowing paying customers to add a simple service without having to upgrade to the next tier, forcing them to buy shit they don't want, is scummy.

2
keeeenerreply
lemm.ee

I'm in the exact same boat with these 3. couldn't be happier

4

Yep, me too. Unbelievable that it was LastPass, Authy and Gmail a few years ago. What a shift for me :-).

9
sh.itjust.works

Wow, so 1Password is not recommended anymore? How come? I’ve been using them for years.

25
glacierreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Possibly because it is not open source and doesn't have anything to offer that the other recommendations do not.

16
Sigma_reply
lemmy.world

Ya I think so. These are always tech articles and Foss software is always a big feature.

But 1password has on going audits and a sane ui and mobile apps that pass the boomer-parent test. Canadian company too which is nice given the US centric tech world.

19

I use it because I share an account with my parents, so I can manage their stuff. My fathers old local Pw-Manager was a mess.

1
Klystronreply
sh.itjust.works

Fastmail integration for masked emails! If you already have an email provider you like then yeah not much to offer. But if you're like me a few years ago and was looking to get off of chromes password manager and gmail, then 1password and fastmail is a nice combo.

6

Bitwarden has integration with Fastmail, as well as for many other alias services (anon addy, SimpleLogin, etc). They also just added support for selfhosted anon addy, and are working on adding support for self hosted SimpleLogin.

4
navireply
lemmy.tespia.org

It's in their honorable mentions.

Have no source available clients is the author's main nit pick.

7

Which personally I think does a disservice to their readers. If their article ends up high in search results for “best password manager 2023” for whatever reason, most people aren’t going to care if there’s a source available client or not.

Dash lane and 1Password might not have source available clients but they likely have better UI/UX than these more open source alternatives that are made for people with technical expertise.

5
timespacereply
sh.itjust.works

Former 1password user, current Bitwarden user. Jumped ship when 1password dicked local vaults. Never been happier.

And it’s a FUCKLOAD cheaper. 1password is very overpriced.

7

Bitwarden is practically free. You can pay for some extra features but all the core features and unlimited passwords storage works. Nobody should pay for a password manager.

4

Same. We’ve been using it for about a decade I think. One vault for my wife and I to share. Hosted on their end in case all our self hosted stuff takes a crap our passwords are still available. Been considering looking at bitwarden but haven’t had the time.

5
lemm.ee

I've been thinking about trying it.. I like Windows Hello integration which seems to easily break in Bitwarden

2

I can personally recommend 1Password, the Windows Hello integration works really well. Asks for your PIN code to unlock (or your master password after a reboot). If you put your computer to sleep rather than turn it off overnight, you won’t need the full master password.

Also, if you’re so inclined, 1P has an excellent CLI tool you can use for accessing vaults programmatically. I use this for auto filling TOTP codes for my Final Fantasy XIV login.

1
lemmy.ca

I use KeePass and keep it synced with self hosting Nextcloud. I get the appeal of bitwarden, but I'm really trying to get off other people's computers.

23
beteljuicereply
lemmy.ml

You can host Bitwarden. It's open source. I do it myself.

17

Bitwarden with the self hosted vaultwarden server then, that way you get the nice bitwarden experience, apps, browser plugins, but all hosted on your own hardware. I run my vaultwarden server on my synology.

6

Bitwarden. Tried Proton Pass but ultimately stuck with Bitwarden.

It has been my password manager of choice for quite some time and I didn't see any reason to change.

21

While I find a discussion about password managers great, I found the article to be underwhelming.

10
lemmy.blahaj.zone

15 years ago the common logic was the most likely way for a password to get stolen is by writing it down and leaving it in an accessible spot, and somebody stealing the password there.

I don't think that logic holds anymore, and with the LastPass breach I think that's proof you want to step away from the cloud not towards it. Imo the most secure way to store passwords is to generate multiple random codes, use a portion of each and then just write those down.

8

15 years ago you had to worry about the people around you. Now you have billions of bots trying to force shit all the time.

8
feddit.de

You can also use a password manager that's not connected to a cloud. Or an encrypted usb stick. The problem with writing it on paper is, that people tend to use too short passwords or repeated passphrases. Using a really long master key and a key file with an encrypted database is safer than a cloud.

3
emptyotherreply
programming.dev

Usb sticks corrupts damn easily. Even faster carrying them around. Learnt that the hard way.

Or does anyone know about an usb stick that is practically immortal, that they can recommend?

3

NVME ssd in a carry usb adapter. It's as reliable as a regular ssd, but it's way more portable and durable than commercial external hdds. A little bigger than usb flash drives but worth the tradeoff. Wouldn't use it as the only backup place for a password dB file but for carrying around its pretty good.

3
g7s
lemmy.ml

GNU Pass, has been the best one so far. Set up your own git to sync it to all devices.

8

Yes, used it for a long time. But moved to keepassxc for easier android and Windows compatibility

3
g7sreply

Pardon me, pass uses GNU PGP. I got that mixed up!

2
lemmy.world

I made a hardware-based password manager that I keep on me with the 3-2-1 rule. (One on me, one at home, one in a remote location) It's barely-secure, but the data is not accessible except when I'm updating it. It's similar to the mooltipass but all the passwords are stored on eeprom.

Could the eeprom be hacked by someone and all my passwords probably read in cleartext? Yeah. How many fucking people actually know how to do that though? Virtually none.

Honestly, I'd love to just simply be able to afford a mooltipass though. :(

This is what I based my personal one on: https://www.instructables.com/PasswordPump-Passwords-Manager/

And I usually generate the passwords with an online tool so that I'm never using the same password twice.

8
Extrasreply
lemmy.today

Why not keepass and its editors and just keep the vault file on a flash drive?

21

Exactly. Plus, if you're a windows user, you can keep the portable version of KeePass on the drive as well.

8
ashtrixreply
lemmy.ca

Not OP but this is exactly what I do and it works great

5

That's a lot of trouble to go into to have questionable security. Though it's admittedly really cool.

I guess this is only great if you have to use potentially compromised computers often, so you are risking leaking at most a single password at a time, but still...

Unlike a proper password manager this still has issues though; for one, saving in cleartext is just bad, reading EEPROMs is trivial, and (perhaps more importantly) unlike a normal password manager this doesn't protect you against inputting data on a wrong (phished) domain.

1
programming.dev

have being using Enpass for a long time, it’s really good, you can choose any cloud provider or host your vault yourself, subscription based payment or one time only

7
slinreply
feddit.de

I am also using Enpass since a decade or so and never had the urge to switch to another provider. Everything works, you got all the features (TOTP, pawned password auto-checks, native apps and autofill, storage of other things than passwords; …) and pricing is still very reasonable.

It can be fully used offline too (with WiFi sync) or with any local storage or online cloud option.

I bought it one time back then but still pay the small subscription fee since I don’t want Enpass to go away.

6

Many of these tools share practically the same set of features, so I like Enpass's ability to store files (i.e. certificates) and any kind of key/value pairs even more.

2
Natanaelreply
slrpnk.net

Depends on how it's implemented. IMHO the best ones are password managers external to the browser but with a plugin which detects the domain name. The risk with autofill is stuff like spoofing and malicious iframes, a secure plugin can detect that and refuse to autofill.

Alternatively, just set it to always ask when it detects a login form.

8

Most browser autofills already work off the domain name? Unless you're saying there's plugins that work off of security certs instead?

2
MooseBoysreply
lemmy.world

Isn’t that, like, the whole point of a password manager?

3

automatic auto fill is where your u/p is filled when you load the page with no interaction required

requiring an interaction to fill the u/p means you expect there to be a login box to fill, which can mitigate certain kinds of compromise

10
lemmy.world

I would guess so, although the real purpose is likely to keep your passwords somewhere so that you can find them when you need them. I'm not sure why autofill is bad since your password manager generally already knows which password works on which website.

2
zmrlreply
lemmy.run

If an attacker compromises the page or does a man in the middle and injects a form that isn't displayed, it can trick your password manager to auto fill your login information and then send it anywhere. But that's just one vector and if an attacker has compromised the server, there are a number of attack vectors they could take.

2

Yeah, if an attacker can modify your page it doesn't matter if you auto-fill, fill on request or copy/enter the credentials manually - you are fucked either way.

1

yeah… you can’t publish a “the best” list like this that doesn’t include the most popular/well-know options without at least writing a little bit about why not those alternatives

to me, it feels a little less like a “the best” and more a “the best that happens to be developed in a reasonable OSS-friendly fashion”

4

I use KeepassXC for years, but lately I'm having problems connecting it. I use it only offline and the Firefox plugin doesn't work very well. It has many options, too many in my opinion. I don't like having my passwords in a company's cloud. The selfhosting is the solution, but i dont have to know

3

I use ironvest, it's had two name changes now, was originally maskme and then blur. I'm sure I found it originally because of an article but I've never seen it mentioned since but for free it's done me well over the years.

2
feddit.nl

Personally I'm using Dashlane, I'm pretty comfortable with it and as far as I know there have been no breaches in security

2

Dashlane is fantastic. I was a bit hesitant about the price, but it's so much sleeker and functional than everything else I've tried.

2
sh.itjust.works

Quick question - any issue with just saving passwords on Firefox? I use FF across all my devices and the sync between them without the need of an extra app is super convenient.

Or am I just being naive?

1

I've been using gopass+Yubikey for years, with gopass syncing to a remote git repository. Works great on my phone too with Open Keychain+Password Store. I'm really happy with it, but do realize it doesn't fit into most people's workflow.

Put my wife on bitwarden though, and she's pleased with it. At some point I'll migrate her over to a self-hosted variant with Vaultwarden, but that's mostly because I prefer to have services in-house, not because either of us are dissatisfied with BW.

1