ddylanmorgan slrpnk.net3Hide 3 repliesExpensive watches are for men who can’t admit they want to wear a bracelet.16Reply
cccunning replylemmy.world…and folks who can admit it but also want that bracelet to be an unnecessarily complex Rube Goldberg machine of gears and springs…3Reply
UndergroundParking replylemmy.cafeAren't those things, at least in part, a way to carry lots of wealth on you quite conveniently?3Reply
qualia replylemmy.worldPocket watches were standard for men for just this readon until WWI when wristwatch convenience helped coordinate timing more efficiently.1Reply
10 replies
It’s almost certain the $7 watch keeps far more accurate time…
Expensive watches are for men who can’t admit they want to wear a bracelet.
…and folks who can admit it but also want that bracelet to be an unnecessarily complex Rube Goldberg machine of gears and springs…
Aren't those things, at least in part, a way to carry lots of wealth on you quite conveniently?
Pocket watches were standard for men for just this readon until WWI when wristwatch convenience helped coordinate timing more efficiently.
but skeleton watches are pretty neat
True
John Mayer:
Ootl, context?
He is an avid watch collector.