Spyke
lemmy.world

I just typed up a funny comedic reply. Then I read it back, and it came off wayyyyy too aggressive. It came off like I was just being an asshole for no reason. So I deleted it, and tried to workshop it. I wanted something that I could say mean spirited things, in a joking way, but it came off waaaaay more mean than it should have been.

So instead, imagine I sent a reply, where I was mean, but you could tell I was joking about the fact that we can't have nice things because we're all plebs, and not the billionaire ruling class. And then we'd laugh while giving them the finger.

Ok, all caught up? Cool. Back to work, dickhead!

39

Didn't have to get all personal about it at the end, bro. I was already having a rough day, now you're just attacking me. :(

4
lemmy.world

This entire saga has been so frustrating to watch unfold. Portions of the judiciary seem absolutely hellbent on denying court ordered financial restitution to the families. It’s not like Alex Jones has even put forward sound legal arguments. My tinfoil hat theory on this is the judges putting up roadblocks are doing it not because of alex jones or free speech, but because it has a connection to guns. They don’t want something even tangentially related to guns to get a win.

70

The lower court judges that have been involved in the cases have largely been fine and just, but once you get to the appellate level it has become evident how partisan our court system has become. I should note that the fifth circuit (one of if not the worst in terms of partisanship) has now denied standing in this latest appeal by Jones, so potentially this is all coming to an end.

12
feddit.org

AJ won't give up. Ever. This - not just the site but the narrative he developed around the trial and the attention he gets for it - is his livelihood, he needs to keep it up no matter how ridiculous, petty and pointless.

I hear it's only a small, partial win anyhow.

No matter for AJ: one more time he's getting media attention.

20
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

He can't give up, because that would mean that he has to start giving all of his money to Sandy Hook families, and he will not do that.

9

And it was declared that his declaration was not sufficient to ignore the bill. That's why Infowars was sold in the first place

4

You reached the end

(April 30, 2026) The Onion’s plan to take over Infowars is once again in jeopardy | Spyke