Spyke
politics·politics byMicroWave

Trump signs executive order on psychedelic drugs — with Joe Rogan by his side

The world’s No. 1 bro-caster, who has expressed some buyer’s remorse over his endorsement of Trump, stood directly behind the president, who was seated at the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office signing an executive order to ease restrictions on medical research and treatments using psychedelic drugs.

Trump signs executive order on psychedelic drugs — with Joe Rogan by his sidehttps://www.ms.now/news/trump-executive-order-psychedelic-drugs-joe-roganOpen linkView original on lemmy.world
lemmy.ca

I can't wait for the day when we no longer have to hear about these two.

134
dan1101reply
lemmy.world

Don't worry the media will still report every time they show their faces or say something stupid

19
athatetreply
lemmy.zip

Can’t show your face after your dead.

16
lemmy.world

Whenever Rogan has a guest on that I think will surely push back on what Rogan is and has been doing in regards to Trump, I watch it just to see if they will say anything. And I'm disappointed every time. I thought for sure, when I saw Bill Murray was on with Joe Rogan, I thought for sure that Bill Murray was gonna push back, and he didn't at all. I naively thought that someone like Bill Murray might be able to get Rogan to see reason.

And then recently David Cross was on Rogan's show, and David Cross is really funny, and I like him. He's super political and he didn't push back at all. Not even a little bit, it was like, what's happening!? I mean, I don't want to give David Cross a hard time about it, but it's like, why did you go on his show? And then not even say anything about how Rogan has conducted himself with Trump.

7

I mean, I don’t want to give David Cross a hard time about it, but it’s like, why did you go on his show?

Probably for the exposure to further his career. Disappointing but he may not actually care about what he says he does.

3
piefed.world

This, and accidentally legalizing hemp weed are possibly the only positive things to come out of this whole debacle

65
Willoughbyreply
piefed.world

no one tell him about November

https://wakenbakery.net/november-2026-hemp-ban-thc-products/

In November 2025, Congress passed H.R. 5371, which rewrites the federal definition of hemp to use total THC instead of just delta-9. This means THCA — which converts to delta-9 when heated — now counts toward the legal threshold. The law also caps finished products at just 0.4mg total THC per container, which would make even a single 5mg gummy illegal.

What Products Are Affected?

  • THCA flower — Raw hemp flower that converts to THC when smoked or vaped. Sales have surged 340% since 2024.
  • Delta-8 and delta-10 THC products — The gas station gummies and vapes that exploded in popularity.
  • Hemp-derived delta-9 gummies and edibles — The legal edibles sold at cannabis cafes and online.
  • HHC products — Synthesized from hemp-derived CBD.
  • THC beverages — Infused seltzers, coffees, and lemonades.
23
Vegan_Joereply
piefed.world

Fuck.

I'm reminded of that early South Park episode where Chef explains that the best way to make a baby cry is to first give it candy.

Then, once the baby is happy, only then do you take it away.

The best way to hurt people is to lift them up first, so the fall back down hurts twice as much...

23
Willoughbyreply
piefed.world

Yeah, I'm sick of it too, I'm a regular THC user and this round, I may bite the bullet and quit entirely. Fuck this entire country.

4

Oh, they're banning hemp-derived THC substitutes at the federal level?

I mean it's pointless and shitty, but not surprising. This doesn't seem to effect states' marijuana laws, just the hemp loophole? Unless that site left out important info

1

The party is in control and they are well aware of November. He doesn't know what is going on.

2

This and reducing marijuana to Schedule III are two popular policies that Democrats are fucking stupid for passing up. If Democrats ever regain power, I do hope this might motivate the party to fully legalize marijuana, psychedelics, and other low-risk drugs like amphetamines.

9

If Democrats rescheduled marijuana, they wouldn't be able to use the issue to win future elections. I love how Biden waited until last minute to demand the rescheduling of marijuana. If he had done it any sooner, his attempt might have been successful.

6

Yea, but doesn't go into effect until November. THCA flower is already banned, but edibles and THCA carts are still legal until then. I'm keeping hope that something will happen before though.

3
sh.itjust.works

This is only an executive order. We know those are meaningless. I’m curious if there will actually be research on something that could go back to being illegal at any time.

52

It might be meaningless legally but we've also learned that the various 3 letter agencies just do whatever the fuck he says anyway.

23
Akh
lemmy.world

Joe Rogan did help to get this guy elected. I hope that is remembered during Nuremberg 2.0

48
krashmoreply
lemmy.world

If we've built a society where Joe Rogan has political influence then that's our fault more than it is his

18
Akhreply
lemmy.world

Propagandist have always existed and in Nuremberg, they were executed

15

Yeah, it's only our fault if they die a peaceful death instead of going to trial

3

Kind of ironic that the multi-decade war on drugs that included things like MDMA, psilocybin, LSD were being done by the cons, as a way to "own the libs":

https://eji.org/news/nixon-war-on-drugs-designed-to-criminalize-black-people/

The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and Black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or Black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and Blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.

The Republican Party has always been full of Republicans.

32

Remember way back like 1 week ago when there was an article saying JoE RoGan TuRnS on MaGa. Fuck that. Once a fascist, always a fascist. Just stop paying attention to him.

27
lemmy.world

You can kind of see this as a general win for anybody who is a fan of using psychedelics for treatment of mental health issues, but it's important to point out that both of the people mentioned in the headline have ulterior motives for this move.

Trump wants to get Joe Rogan back on his side after he alienated him with his Iran antics. Joe Rogan is one of the biggest conservative megaphones in the nation and he can't afford to have him be talking shit about MAGA before the midterms, so he'll throw him a bone about this one issue that he doesn't give a fuck about anyway.

Joe Rogan is doing this to be able to hopefully one day self-administer psychedelics, not get meaningful treatment or aid from a professional to guide him through the process and change himself for the better.

I'm not sure which of these two are being more selfish at this point.

20

Well, it's an EO, too, so can be overturned on a whim, so it might be hard to make any long-term research/business plans based on just an EO, especially from this dumpster fire of a "president".

The Democrats should make it priority #1 to reverse and pave over everything with the taint of donnie on it, but in some cases I fear they may overcorrect, and I hope this is not one of them.

5
GG
kbin.earth

While I absolutely hate the mango and I am not a fanboy of the bald dude, I am pretty happy to hear psychedelics will be legal. It was about time, man.

16
lemmy.world

will be legal

Oh you sweet summer child. This is an EO to study them - do you sincerely believe they’re not going to try to sell you new TrumpRx “medicines?” This is not a win as I see it

22

Yeah, unfortunately this is just making it easier for connected people to do what they want and sell what they want, but plebs are still going to be getting their asses kicked by shithead cops for having suspicious looking multivitamins

9

Honestly psychedelics turned my opinion on living around when I was younger and I was just messing around recklessly with them (I mean, Not too recklessly, safe tested doses and that, but I’m not a doctor!)

I do not doubt it could be helpful or useful ina therapeutic setting, especially when administered by people who know what they’re doing.

But we all know Trump is doing this to win back Rogan, who he needs to keep the roid bros in line

13
zbyte64reply
awful.systems

Psychedelics doesn't magically make a bad person into a good person, just look at Joe Rogan. Though I am all for putting the entire admin deep into a k-hole that they will never escape from

6

There is only one cure for lead deficiency. Leading more effectively, ahem.

3

You dont think hes been part of a thing at some point where they take the pineal gland out of a living person?....

1
lemmy.world

Joe Rogaine is proof that no matter how much money you have, you can't buy a full head of hair

8

Perhaps with this easing of restrictions on psychedelics they’ll find some new combination of shrooms, horse dewormer, bleach, and toilet seat coke that will bring it back. At a minimum that combo will have you thinking your hair is back.

2

Rogan told reporters he learned about the medical benefits of psychedelics from an interview on his podcast with W. Bryan Hubbard, the CEO of the nonprofit Americans for Ibogaine — who stood next to Rogan in the Oval Office — and former Energy Secretary Rick Perry.

The fuck? Who let Rick “and the third thing i can’t remember” Perry in there??

7
lemmy.world

Please help me understand how this is remotely a W. They are never going to willingly give people good things that make life better.

5
Dalkorreply
lemmy.world

It is a W, it'd be more of a W if they hadn't completely fucked grants and medical research funding. The truth is that it's insane what the medical community has to do to research the medical viability of something that was ruled to have no medical viability, despite at the time it was scheduled showing promise and continuing to show promise outside of the states and in the medical studies that have bent over backwards to follow the rules.

Psychedelics were once viewed as one of the most promising breakthroughs in mental health treatment and because of Nixon and Regan and their racist war on drugs, that legacy has been kicked down the road.

I'll concede that it's a minor w, in a sea of shit, piss, and blood. But I'm gonna count my blessings.

4

It's too bad this maladministration is cutting scientific research funding so deeply, so not sure how much any research is going to happen, including this, but....I remain hopeful, I guess.

2
Gerudoreply
lemmy.zip

This isn't making it legal at all. This is reducing restrictions on research.

9

Even under the absolutely fucking absurd peak of the "War on Drugs", I remember applying to a marijuana research study as a test subject. I didn't get in - they had a battery of questions up front and I assume something I answered there resulted in rejection, but I knew another student that did it.

Given it was Schedule 1, I'm sure there was not nearly enough, but I guess it still did happen.

1
lemmy.world

I asked you, after you stated it’s “a W,” to help me understand your thinking. I’ve already given reasons why I think this is neutral at best.

Why do you consider this to be a good thing, after what you’ve seen them do to “science” and “health?”

5

Come now, it's better. Just as breakbone fever is better than malaria. Our country has been permanently seized by gangsters. And your countries are next. Which is not better. We are doomed, doomed I tell you. Unless we organize obviously.

1
artyomreply
piefed.social

Yes, I did read your comment before replying to it. You explained nothing. I don't know how to explain how legalization of readily available an inexpensive methods that have been proven to treat mental illnesses for decades being even considered for legalization is obviously a W.

-4
artyomreply
piefed.social

It's in the article:

The executive order directs the Food and Drug Administration to support clinical trials for psychedelics and speed up the process to approve drugs deemed to be safe and effective , including ibogaine, psilocybin, MDMA and LSD, all of which are illegal in the United States.

I'm not sure what other way you could interpret that.

1

Oh ok well if it’s in the article, that must mean MAGA will just do a great job

Thanks for pointing that out

-2

Rogan wants a bunch of legal drugs but I'm pretty sure trump just wants legit ludes

5
lemmy.world

The president also joked about getting ibogaine for himself as he pointed to a study that found that people who took the drug experienced a massive reduction in symptoms of depression and anxiety within a month.

“Can I have some, please? I’ll take some,” he said. “I don’t have time to be depressed. You know, you stay busy enough, maybe that works too. That’s what I do.”

Anybody seen my violin?

4
Almaccareply
aussie.zone

I don't believe for a second that he suffers from depression or anxiety. He's a carrier - he induces it in others.

2

I'm pretty sure that a lot of the horrible shit that comes out of conservatives is their response to their anxieties.

It's kind of like fight or flight. Although most people turn it inwards and recluse, some people become aggressive and turn it outwards in reaction to it.

2

Damn that title had me very confused. But weirdly enough not super-super-surprised

3

I really thinks more research into these things could be beneficial. The worst that could happen is they discover it could make things worse but deciding without data is foolish.

3

Hope this isn't some strange 4-d chess move to have dem ban them because it was associated with trump. I doubt it, but I do fear.

0