Spyke
slrpnk.net

Soon you'll have to pay for the privilege of communicating with a human instead of an LLM chat bot.

Edit: I realize I need to specify because I forgot to add relevant context.

37

That's too easy. Surely we could squeeze in another middleware to maximize profit?

Introducing:

"Drink a verification can to confirm you're human"

5
lmr0x61reply
lemmy.ml

…Who is getting payed shit wages for the privilege of having that job

8
zewmreply
lemmy.world

I don’t event want to talk to another human for free. Why would I pay for it.

5

Because there is a slight chance of them resolving your issue...

2
piefed.social

This comment actually doesn't make sense since there's always been a price to communicate outside of face to face (postage, telephone, ISP, etc.). I get the spirit of it, though.

4
sh.itjust.works

My bank recently switched all of its tellers with a row of ATMs inside the bank. I think this is kind of what they’re talking about.

7
piefed.social

My bank is strictly online and have never had to pay extra (for now) for any kind of extended service nor ever had to speak to a rep. I kinda like it that way.

2

I haven’t had to pay extra yet, but I am anticipating that being a thing soon. But I do have to drive further to get to a bank that still has a notary.

3
Wizreply
midwest.social

Switch to a credit union. If your bank is publicly traded then a portion of their profits are being syphoned away to rich douchbags, instead of services to customers.

2

It is a credit union… we switched to them ~12 years ago because Bank of America was being an asshole with their fees.

3
zoutreply

I communicate way more face to face than in another way. So if I read communicating, I'm not thinking of calling, emailing, letterwriting or anything not face to face.

2
lemmy.world

I’ve started throwing out socks I bought 4-5 months ago for developing holes. Same brand I’ve been buying for 15+ years and used to be able to go 18-24 months before needing replacements.

Contemporary fascism can’t even make the proverbial trains run on time.

33
piefed.social

It's really quite depressing and infuriating. I'm finally financially in a good spot to afford better quality clothes. I want to buy something that'll last me years and years. I don't like to participate in fast fashion. So I looked up which brands people recommended. Turns out everyone's in agreement that even the expensive stuff from previously well respected brands is now overpriced crap that falls apart within a year.

I've got clothes from 20 years ago, some even much older from my mom that holds up better than things I bought a year ago. I hate it, fuck late stage capitalism.

21

Absolutely. I’m admittedly a bit of a clothes horse and it really used to be that, within reason, there were brand names that used to be a reasonable proxy for quality. But now I’m looking at shirts from the same place I bought them from years ago and the fabric is thin to the point where it’s actually sheer.

5

I always buy secondhand these days for this reason unless it’s from a brand that still has its reputation in tact.

3
psudreply
aussie.zone

Socks are built to lowest cost. If you want good socks, get wool or cotton from a small company, but expect to pay more

3
lemmy.world

If you're in the us, darn tough are great quality, wool, and come with a lifetime warranty.

1

From outside the US the YouTubers advertising your brand includes several that only advertise stuff they use, that along with the warranty makes them moderately convincing to me

I suspect though that the lifetime warranty isn't as generous as it appears as there are a few common insects that eat wool, so woolen things don't last well unless reasonably protected

1

Tf are you calling making worse socla fascism

You are stripping the word from its meaning

1
startrek.website

I disagree, lots of things are much cheaper and worse.

Clothes are much cheaper and far worse. Power tools are generally a lot cheaper bit also built to break.

Houses are somehow more expensive AND lower quality though.

4
psudreply
aussie.zone

Lower quality? Modern houses here (Canberra, Australia) typically have all the energy stars (compared to my '70s place's half a star), are much larger and are proof against termites

A 2026 house beats mine in every respect

3

That’s the only good thing about them. Other than that, I wouldn’t say they are constructed better, but I don’t know anything about Australian house construction. In America, you can find older homes with old growth forest woods in them that you can’t simply have in a house anymore because the trees simply don’t exist in circulation for obvious reasons.

3

You reached the end

Enshittiflation | Spyke