Orban's chances of winning Hungary election drop after JD Vance rally
https://www.newsweek.com/viktor-orban-hungary-election-jd-vance-rally-11804123Open linkView original on lemmy.ca508
Comments54
https://www.newsweek.com/viktor-orban-hungary-election-jd-vance-rally-11804123Open linkView original on lemmy.ca
So betting markets not polls, which would be pricing in the diminishing uncertainty as the day draws near, and it wasn't like a sudden drop either.
There might not be a story here. Orban was losing, and he's still losing.
So someone will bet big on him on Friday and they'll do everything possible that he wins.
If you're in Fidesz you already have a major financial stake in him winning. And maybe a stay-out-of-jail stake.
Remember Trumps son is a part of pollymarkets board
Hopefully he doesn't lose like Nicolas Maduro lost the last election.
*based on odds on fucking polymarket. This is not news
Thanks for saving me a click
What, she couldn't have just had OpenAI write the article for her?
If you see the line "Why it matters", it's very probably written by AI
I do rather hate that so many news orgs seem to be using polymarket et al as a drop-in replacement for actual polling, because polymarket is loosely affiliated, if at all, with reality. It’s a fucking betting platform. There’s nothing scientific or statistical about it that aligns with demographic realities.
Newsweek has always been a questionable source since its purchase by the notorious IBT. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Newsweek_(2013-present)
Not to mention that a quality poll would just be among qualified likely voters in the election in question, where as polymarket is just gambling addicts anywhere on the planet.
But at the same time Polymarket seems a bit like a self fulfilling prophecy - because Polymarket says something, it by itself increases the odds of that event happening; and in the cases where it isn't this way, look for the large amount of bets 2 hours before the event in questing, a.k.a the "GOP spike".
On the other hand, it's well designed to surface inside information. Exactly the thing that lots of people complain about, but it's a good thing if you'd like to use the prediction market to make predictions like this.
Lol
Did you say thank you?
After killing the Pope, and destroying Orban's political career, Vance is the Political Grim Reaper.
He should spend more time with Trump.
Betting markets. Grain of salt taken.
If an STD were human. It would be J.D. Vance.
Well, that'd be one fo the first times Vance has done something that's worth a shit, even if it were inadvertent.
Even bad people can be useful! Even if only as a bad example.
the Trump bump killed Pierre Poilievre's 30% lead in Canada, and even after the loss, his MPs are all looking to defect to the Liberals.
These guys are clueless, this is not what Canada wants to see in political leadership...
I wouldn't mind if Carney or Lewis went on JRE though.
One can only hope.
JD baby face screaming about how EU tries to affect the voting, proceeds to manipulate the public with his speech. Ooookeydokay
JD Vance is the human equivalent of a sad trombone
I know he kills Orban's chances just like he killed the pope.
Hmmm, couch fucker should do a world tour. Damage them all.
Didn't he kill the Pope already?
This can be his restitution - do the same to every conservative party on earth
Okay now THAT'S fuckin funny.
The walking ballot-poison.
Chef's kiss!
I'd personally be happier if the EU had some kind of election inspectors on the ground for somewhat sketchy times like this.
Trouble is we're in a system where the likes of Orban can and do veto these kind of things, the entire process is flawed.
Alternative theory: Western news's emphasis on this made more people (on Polymarket, the poll in question) aware that Orbán was actually being challenged. I'm not sure if that holds true for voting Hungarians.
I was really wondering about that. At the time, I was saying to myself, "This is not the endorsement you think it is, Orban.", lol.
Europe needs to elect socialist leaders to respond to this moment, or fall into the grips of fascism.
::: spoiler How does capitalism inevitably lead to fascism?
:::
::: spoiler But can't capitalism can be reformed?
Any ideology or system that justifies and fosters self-interest over solidarity will lead to a concentration of power. If someone, whether by a stroke of luck or by intentional manipulation, can end up having and holding more power than others, cumulative probability will make it a question of time until such a someone succeeds in using that power to amass more.
What is your point? Most people want to advance, ideally their whole live long, instead of standing still or even regressing.
I'm doubling down on the point made by the previous comment: Capitalism as a system enables that aggregation of power.
I'm not sure what you mean by "advance". If you mean self-improvement or improving living conditions, that doesn't have to come with a detriment to others. We can lift each other up. Life isn't a zero-sum game, if technological advancement is focused on increasing our productivity in order to generate overall prosperity and leisure to pursue fulfilment rather than maximising unsustainable profit and pushing most of us to pursue subsistence while a few become ever more obscenely powerful.
If you mean advancement in a hierarchy of power, then that's exactly the issue I'm criticising: self-interest instead of solidarity, sabotaging quality of life by pushing us into a rat race of having to do better than others.
I generally agree, that's why I am an anarchist - If you haven't heard much about anarchism before, you probably have some misconceptions about it, so I encourage you to watch the Q&Anarchy video series by Thought Slime or have a look through an Anarchist FAQ, because it's almost definitely nothing like what you think. I personally believe that it's the most coherent philosophy which adequately explains and addresses all of the problems which plague our society, and which holds the most promise for a path out of the inevitable cycle of the continuous rise and fall of fascism that capitalism makes inevitable.
That's what I was getting at.
I try to avoid dropping the term (precisely because of the misconceptions involved) and personally am not a fan of the heavy-handed "here's a block of information for you to absorb" approach that has long deterred me from looking into it. I just can't easily work up the energy, attention span and time to commit to longer reading or video series.
Hence, my attempt is to "sow" the rough ideas in a format I personally found more digestible. We all know the "didn't read the article" phenomenon, so I try to sum it up in a shorter comment rather than expecting people to click through to some treatise where the table of contents for Section A already spans three mobile screens, the third paragraph of the introduction to it (not even A.1 yet) metions five sections (A-E), dubs them just the "first part" and strikes a very much academic tone.
Don't get me wrong, it's a good source to read up on the theory, but not what I'd consider an approachable FAQ for curious laypeople.
The fact that the Russian asset still has changes is concerning
Why are we taking g the opinions of degenerate addicts and pretending it is relevant or scientific in any way?
smug lol
If it wasn't clear that Orban is just a puppet before, then you must have noticed after this.
:sicko-yes:
This is the guy in position to take over MAGA if a major cardiovascular event were to happen in the near future. This gives me hope.
Keep feeding these idiots egos that they’re liked and are helpful so they continue sabotaging their elections.
I did think he would bad luck for their campaign - I just assumed he was just really popular in Hungary or something. Guess my instinct was right.
I guess they're at least doing the foreign politics thing without bombs this time, so we have that going for us 🫠
ETTD has spread to his VP. You love to see it.
A strong man standing next to a fat faced pussy bitch makes him seem…less strong.