Spyke
sopuli.xyz

All food oil is 9kcal/g, carbs and protein are 4kcal/g.

The chili oil is mostly oil.

123
lemmy.ca

Sure, but this stuff is like triple the density of oil if 4 tsp is 60g

17
potatereply
lemmy.ca

60g of oil is 540 kcal-ish. The chili pepper is comparatively calorie free, so yea, 440kcal makes total sense.

Is it the tsp that's throwing you off? I think there's a typo - 4 tbsp would be about 60g. 4tsp I would expect to be about 20g.

I way prefer dealing in mass for cooking and baking personally...

40
Logireply
lemmy.world

It is broken down into 43g fat, 10g cars and 4g protein. Using another commenter's numbers of 9kcal/g for fat and 4kcal/g for the others gives 443 kcal. So yeah, well within margin.

11

Dang. Wouldn't have expected that either. Then again, I don't use a ton on food because I don't want things to be sopping in oil.

1
Logireply
lemmy.world

60g is excessive. I think they got their serving size wrong. Unless this is to make an entire big bowl of Sichuan chicken or something, rather than adding in after.

1

It also says 60g, which maths with everything else.

Minor translation error on units they don’t use in China.

36

Probably an error and they accidentally calculated for 4 tablespoons instead of 4 teaspoons.

16

Oil is literally fat.

The only thing more calorically dense is alcohol.

Edit: my brain mixed the two. Fat is more dense than alcohol.

49
Amulettareply
lemmy.ca

Four teaspoons isn't very much though. Most oils and fats are about 60 calories per teaspoon, which would only be about 240 to 260 for the amount listed on the jar.

4
Amulettareply
lemmy.ca

Teaspoon is abbreviated to "tsp", tablespoon is "tbsp".

6

Or

  • tablespoon = T
  • teaspoon = t

I get that. But I think we can all agree that labels can have errors. I think that this is one of those errors.

1
lemmy.ca

Hey OP. I think those numbers are based off the 60grams not the 4tsp.

4tsp of olive oil is 18 grams. 60grams of olive oil would be about 500 calories. I would assume they weight similar.

41
lemmy.ca

That's my thought too, although 4tbsp would be a pretty hefty serving size so I'm betting their mistake was using tbsp when converting to grams (when they meant to use tsp) and then it's likely correct from there.

9
radixreply
lemmy.world

The whole jar says 210g, so unless you're supposed to use ~30% of the container, somebody messed up a conversion.

6
spongebuereply
lemmy.world

And 4 tbsp would be triple 4 tsp, or 54 grams. Similar ballpark at least.

7
Canacondareply
lemmy.ca

google says that 60grams is the common conversion for 4 tablespoons.

3

Grams are a measure of weight (well, mass if you want to be really specific). Tablespoons are a measure of volume. In order to do a proper comparison you need to know density.

Because metric plans things nicely, a gram is one milliliter of water. 4 tbsp is 59.15ml. So... Yeah, pretty damn close to 60, but again that's when working with water. I would imagine chili flakes are a little less dense and might throw that calculation off a bit.

4
Coskiireply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

It's not though. 4 tsp of butter is significantly less calories than what that label states.

So there's definitely something wrong. I'm thinking they either meant tbsp instead of tsp, or looked up the wrong one.

I found the same brand on amazon. It's exactly what I thought.

https://a.co/d/0cMp8JUi

13
mbfalzarreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I didn't even notice the tsp, I just looked at the info for 60g of butter to compare to 60g of chili sauce

9
lemmy.world

You have to drink 3 litres of this each day to get your required calcium

14
Atroposreply
lemmy.world

It's been rough, but my bones are in good shape

12
Lommyreply
lemmy.world

Who needs bones when you'll be at the toilet all day?

7

Oil is the thing you want to carry when you’re though-hiking and you want max calories/lb of weight carried. Obviously you can’t eat only oil but you can use it to make oil-heavy dishes such as spaghetti aglio e olio.

7

Is she the reason I havent been losing weight!

Edit: MINE SAYS THE SAME!

5

Oil 43g x 9 kcal/g = 387 kcal. Carbs 40 g x 4 kcal/g = 160 kcal. Protein 4 g x 4 kcal/g = 16 kcal. Total 387+160+16 = 563 kcal. Definitely different. Could it be that oil is 34 and not 43 g? With the oil actually ubeing a tad under the rule-of-thumb 9 kcal/g this might then add up.

5
lemmy.world

The wildest part of Lao Gan Ma is sodium if you ask me. Some of the Chinese import ones are over 1000mg per serve, though the domestically made ones are a bit healthier. That said, you're probably not using 4 tsp of the stuff in most things.

3

probably not using 4 tsp of the stuff in most things

That's hard when putting it on rice. So addicting, but yes, not good.

4
lemmy.today

I remember reading somewhere that uranium is calorie dense.

So if you're trying to bulk up, have a lil' uranium snack. As a treat!

3
fedia.io

60ml a.k.a. 4 tbsp sounds like a lot of chili oil to put in one serving. And I really enjoy teh spicy chili.

5
KairuBytereply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Lazy copy paste, no guarantee any of this is right because I’m on mobile:

Nutrition Facts

Valeur nutritive

Per 4 tsp (60 g)

pour 4 c. à thé (60 g)

Calories 440

Fat / Lipides 43 g

Saturated / saturés7 g

% Daily Value* % valeur quotidienne*

57%

38%

+ Trans / trans 0.5 g

Carbohydrate / Glucides 10 g

Fibre / Fibres 5 g

Sugars / Sucres 2 g

18%

2%

Protein/Protéines 4 g

Cholesterol / Cholestérol 0 mg

Sodium 680 mg

Potassium 250 mg

Calcium 30 mg

30%

5%

2%

14%

Iron / Fer 2.5mg

  • 5% or less is a little, 15% or more is a lot
  • 5% ou moins c'est peu, 15% ou plus c'est beaucoup
5