Spyke

Bacardi? It would be off-brand for them to not back dictatorships.

14
zephyreksreply
programming.dev

Doesn't stop Ukraine from buying drones built by Xiaomi and sold/distributed by Alibaba.

-7
kbin.social

I don't see why it would. It's not like they're in a position to not buy from wherever they can.

22
kbin.social

It doesn't affect it one way or the other. What does is their continuing operations in Russia, who started and is continuing the war.

4
DrMreply
feddit.de

If you buy a drone for lets say 1000$ from Xiaomi via AliBaba, 100$ of those go to AliBaba maybe 1$ goes to Russia. from the 900$ left for Xiaomi, 600 are gone for the production. 300 left, 3 go to Russia. 4$ for Russia. But if this drone helps invalidate only one russian soldier, that 4$ are easily worth 100000$. If it helps invalidate a tank, it goes to the millions. Thats easily worth it if there is no alternative

16
Corkyskogreply
sh.itjust.works

I have also seen people say "I buy from Amazon, because I don't want to support Alibaba"... like dude where do you think "VURUU" brand you just bought from sources all their shit from?

14
derporeply
lemmy.world

You mean VRCUUC isn’t a homegrown American brand?

7
lemmy.world

Took me about 7 seconds of thinking before I realized you meant Mars. Couldn't remember a God named Pepsi for the life of me.

113
kroldenreply
lemmy.ml

Pepsi is actually named after Pepe the frog.

20

Actually it's named after the Pepsicum plant, which gives Pepsi it's garbage taste.

1

Franklin Clarence Mars (/ˈmɑːrz/; September 24, 1883 – April 8, 1935) was an American business magnate who founded the food company Mars, Incorporated, which mostly makes chocolate candy. Mars' son Forrest Edward Mars developed M&M's and the Mars bar. He is also widely believed to be the god of war.

24
lorezreply
lemm.ee

But I love Mars. It's so delicious.

-1
lemm.ee

You do have a point... Nestlé is also as evil as they come but a KitKat® is so delicious

3
Druidreply
lemmy.zip

FYI: the "the" before Ukraine is superfluous. You can just type "like Ukraine just accused you of."

17
ludreply
lemm.ee

What about:

  • the England
  • the Germany
  • the France
  • the Sweden
  • the Russia
  • the Poland

Normal country names don't begin with "the"

"The United States of America" makes grammatical sense. "The Ukraine" or any of the above doesn't .

24
lemmy.world

In Dutch it's just called Nederland. "The" is added when referring to it in English since it makes more grammatical sense in English. The Low-Lying Lands.

Ukraine is its full proper name, from the original name of Україна, which can be romanized to Ukraine.

4

It's actually a really interesting but of english.

We include 'the' when the type of government or state is mentioned which is why it is just China but it's the people's Republic of china or in the case of a region, like the Cotswolds.

Ukraine was referred to as the Ukraine during the soviet Union as it was a region of a greater country. Therefore using the Ukraine basically diminishes Ukraine to a territory of another country which is sorta what they're fighting not to be.

9

Yeah, no. They can earn millions with Russia, so they do. Spend half on that in good PR, and you still earned millions in blood money.

And if people get pissed? The news cycle means they'll forget about this in about 3 days so you're good

2

Pepsi has a history in Russia. They once traded the USSR soda in exchange for a fleet of naval ships. IIRC at the time Pepsi had the 4th largest navy in the world. They sold the ships to Norway.

1
lemmy.world

"international war sponsor" what a nice title, I think every company operating in US should have it!

45

Because most international conflicts that the US enters are due to threats (or potential windfalls) to the profitability of our largest companies.

Or at least that's the joke/context

35
oce 🐆reply
jlai.lu

Can we not be as stupid as redditors when they downvote people for asking questions?

20
Dkarmareply
lemmy.world

No one is downvoting for asking questions they're downvoting for asking trolling questions that are either obvious or can be answered by a quick Google search.

Only a troll is "unaware" the us has committed war crimes itself often at the direction of corporations.

Eg: the dole company in South and central America etc.

2
oce 🐆reply
jlai.lu

Maybe give them the benefit of the doubt, not everyone is from the USA or obsessed by it here, and good answers can teach people efficiently, I'm pretty sure you learned things this way yourself.

12
Dkarmareply
lemmy.world

No, everyone has access to Google. This is a cop out that allows trolls to appear to be legitimate question askers. They are not. Do not entertain the notion.

0

Yes the guy providing common sense answers is totally a troll. You got me. The most pragmatic troll ever.

1
Nythosreply
sh.itjust.works

Asking the question promotes discussion.

Which is exactly what Lemmy needs to show to newcomers it’s not a barren wasteland of nothing.

5

Asking a dumb question promotes ridicule...always has. Lemmy is no different.

1

No, I'm not Raid. I'm my own original game, Rage. People really need to get their facts straight...

3

This explains why LinkedIn was sending out surveys today asking "What do you think about PepsiCo?", "What are the top reasons you would want to work at PepsiCo?", to a bunch of people. The whole thing was extremely weird, and obviously a PR campaign

29
lemmy.world

Just another reason to not drink the diabetes piss water that is Pepsi. They lost the cola wars for a reason. Come sucks too, but fuck Pepsi even harder.

26
espentanreply
lemmy.world

I almost keeled over laughing the first time I saw that.

Edit: Wish there was one called Wham Bam Tank You Ma'am

3

Every time I see that name I have to pause and acknowledge that holy crap somebody actually did that.

It’s like a much more mundane version of “holy crap that guy was really the president of the US, and for a while and everything!

2
oatscoopreply
midwest.social

Royal Crown is superior anyway, and I'll fight anyone that says it ain't.

4
pharreply
lemmy.ml

Have you had rc anytime recently? It tastes like store brand soda

4

Hexbear's been isolated for a while, and their site developed a culture of trashing on people who "debate" in bad faith, as well as some other stuff like PPB which is weird especially for outsiders.

If you're browsing internal Hexbear posts, you'll find lots of posts under irony which make them perhaps difficult to appreciate. I'd recommend visiting Lemmygrad first.

4

They are easily riled and while I doubt there is intentional coordination in place, due to their fervour, they can come across like a brigade. If you speak up against them - cue the hexbears flocking to this comment no doubt - they can get quite vicious, as my comment history will witness.

4
Asymptotereply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Increasingly, "tankies" seem to cover any infraction against the approved anti-russian fervor;

  • if you are not convinced Russia blew up Nord Stream
  • if you are not convinced that Russia blew up a farmer and a tractor in Poland
  • if you are not convinced that Ukraines summer offensive is going all that well
  • if you believe normal Russian people are not evil monsters
  • if you are not convinced that Putin ordered the downing of Prigozhins plane
-1

I have been called one just for being critical of the US military, it's a catch all term for anyone that isnt strictly for capitalist imperialism. I consider it a soft resurgence of the red scare, I cringe each time I see it just like when I see the term lib.

Both the pro Russian and the pro america-no-matter-the-cost crowds just stink of stupidity imo

4
set_secretreply
lemmy.world

so given 90% of the planet believe normal Russian people aren't evil monsters, the default position is tankies?

3
ThePacreply
lemmy.ml

One might say you yourself are obfuscating the meaning behind pro-russian rhetoric.

5
lemmy.ml

Equivalent of "woke", but used by liberals. Generally meaning "people left of us that we don't like".

-16
lemmy.sdf.org

Not really. It's someone who claims to be liberal or progressive or a way left thinker willing to use force to make the world what they want

People who diminish or refute Tiananmen Square 1989 are tankies

8

Because tankies are next-level communists. So while all tankies are also commies, not all commies are tankies.

For me the biggest distinction is that I think commies are just naive and want to live in a fairy tale, tankies are actually malicious and want to fuck it up for all of us if we let them.

3

It's original definition doesn't include liberals. I consider myself relatively left. I've had people ridicule some of my viewpoints for being too liberal (I guess too center for them). Those people were tankies, but they weren't tankies because they're more left than me. It's because they consider themselves to be very left leaning while still praising authoritative regimes and being apologists for them. That's the tank part. They're alright with military dictatorships of the past and even consider them to have been successful. They also rarely are able to admit the flaws of those regimes (including the genocides), and even if they do, there's a "reason" for it (X might have been bad and did this, but at the same time, it also did Y which was somewhat good)

2
lemmygrad.ml

This is the problem with "tankie", nobody can actually define it.

You, attempting to refute that it's "woke" but for liberals, proved that it is "woke" for liberals.

1

attempting to refute that it’s “woke” but for liberals

The best refutation is that woke is "woke" for liberals, but Americans fail to recognize both of their parties are liberals.

5

Thanks to open source and federation we can fork and kick them out (and also tell them to kill themselves enough that they either leave or actually do.)

They didn't invent ActivityPub and don't have any role in its development.

2
lemmy.world

Man disappointing seeing how many companies I recognize on that list. Boycotting all these companies would be difficult considering how a lot of the companies on here own 20+ brands.

6
lemmy.ca

Yeah Proctor & Gamble is the toughest one for me. They kinda have a lock on some industries like laundry detergents.

I guess we just do our best. Russia is a small market, so it doesn't take to much of hit to these bastards in the bigger markets before they abandon Russia.

6
ludreply

In Europe Unilever or Mondelez is probably the hardest for me.

2

There’s a reason they say that there is no ethical consumption under capitalism. This isn’t to say we should just throw our hands up and give in, but do whatever the hell you can.

For instance—sorry if you already know to do this—it may not apply for a lot of these companies, in that the goods are consumed, but whenever you can, buy secondhand to reduce not just waste, but also profits for whoever produces the product you buy. Also, sorry if it sounds trite, but I like to think that every little step helps in some way.

4
kbin.social

I'll definitely be checking what I buy from these companies and making adjustments to my habits.

Slava Ukraine.

10
lemmy.ml

Better be careful, I hear Pepsi had the biggest warfleet in the world at one point.

6

Oh, no, they prob. do, they just won’t give it to you even when you rightfully won it

2
root_beerreply
midwest.social

I think that was Coca-Cola, Pepsi was The Choice of a New Generation.

Commercialism! Ta-dah!

2
lemmygrad.ml

"Worthless Nazis and White Supremacists get mad at people of color making money"

wew

-29
lemmy.world

Why do I see lemmygrad cockroaches if lemmy.world defederated from that hellhole?

5

Your instance hasn't defederated from Lemmygrad yet, and we won't defederate your instance so you have to deal with expanding your perspectives.

-3

Dealing with lemmygrad users is "expanding perspectives" as much as massive diarrhea is just "a weight loss program" - technically it's true but it's still shit.

And coincidentally, most of what Lemmygrad users write is a diarrhea.

3
lemmy.ninja

Let's leave Ukraine deals alone with their shit. they are on my nerve. silly spoiled kid

-29