Spyke
yokonzoreply
lemmy.world

I prefer the old โ€œdrop a usb in the parking lotโ€

59
teftreply
startrek.website

Nowadays you'd probably be more likely to get a hit by putting an "Anime titties" label on the drive

39

Just put the CEO's name on it and a very recent date. They'll be dying to know what secret information the CEO was carrying around.

8
Dandroidreply
dandroid.app

I prefer a label that says, "Warning: USB stick contains scary virus. Do not plug into a computer"

8
Martineskireply
lemmy.fmhy.net

There are usb sticks that can kill your pc by getting charged and then discharging all the electricity at once to your pc so no sandbox will save you in situations like those.

4

Me: Plugs USB into throwaway computer. Computer: dies. Me: "well that's a pretty boring virus!"

3
UnculturedSwinereply
lemmy.world

Or even jaded tech savvy people. I work in IT and there have been a number of times that I have witnessed or heard about people who know better causing an incident because they're burnt out or irate.

22
illireply

This seems like there is an idea for a joke or a comic here somewhere...

17
Frozengyroreply
lemmy.world

It's *******, what's yours?

Edit: that's cool, Lemmy blocks it out!

18
rmukreply

Ah, cool, let me try:

iWantToSuckFrozengyro'sToes69

10
EmoDuck
sh.itjust.works

Hacker voice: "I'm in"

Looks at overly complicated industry software he's never even heard of before

"I'm out"

98
lemmy.ml

Wait, I have an idea! Yes, just as I thought, I can overlay their proprietary operating system with this fancy looking graphical interface that resembles nothing and gain full control of their system. I'm back in!

13

So they have a fancy representation of ... something with a hex table, that then transforms into a map of London given the right key?

2
lemmy.ca

We have these obligatory online seminars about web security /privacy at work.

Turns out that for some reason, with Privacy Badger enabled, they appear as "passed" instantly. I never saw a single second of these endless seminars.

I tried to tell the IT guy but he couldn't care less and I suspect he didn't even know what Privacy Badger actually is

75
pwalkerreply
discuss.tchncs.de

now I want to know what privacy badger is amd I'm too lazy to google it...

4

The books that Cereal Killer pulls out are all legit also. The titles at least are all real books.

5
lemm.ee

(Opens DOS, frantically types)
โ€œHeh. I was able to SSH right into their jpg with nothing but an Ethernet cable and router grease.โ€

45

router grease

I donโ€™t think thatโ€™s what you think it is sir carefully hides tissues

29
sh.itjust.works

We get fake phishing emails that are actually from IT and if we don't recognize and report them, we get a talking-to. It's a good way of keeping employees vigilant.

45
cynarreply
lemmy.world

A friend (who actually works in IT) apparently has a good system at his company. It actually automates turning real phishing attempts into internal tests. It effectively replaces links etc and sends it onwards. If the user actually clicks through, their account is immediately locked. It requires them to contact IT to unlock it again, often accompanied by additional training.

36
zalgotextreply
sh.itjust.works

Wait. So your friend's company has the ability to reliably detect phishing attacks, but instead of just blocking them outright, it replaces the malicious phishing links with their own phishing links, sends those on to employees, and prevents them from doing their jobs of they fall for it?

Sounds like your friend's company's IT people are kind of dickheads

2

I work at a company that does something similar; it can be annoying to deal with these fake phishing emails from our own IT, but a 10-15 minute training session if you fail is a lot less disruptive than what can happen if you clicked the real link instead.

I consider myself a bit more tech-savvy than average, but Iโ€™ve almost fallen for a couple of these fake phishing emails. It helps me to keep up with what the latest versions of these attacks look like (and keeps me on my toes tooโ€ฆ)

10
cynarreply

It's not every phishing email. I think it's technically those that get through the initial filters, and get reported, but don't quote me on that. Apparently it's quite effective. They also don't need to report every one. It's only if they do something that could have compromised the company that causes a lock down. It's designed to be disruptive and embarrassing, but only if they actively screw up.

2
rbitsreply

Well the company probably can't detect them reliably, so wih the ones it does detect it trains them to avoid the ones that they can't detect.

2
grysbokreply
lemmy.sdf.org

My last company did this. They'd also send out surveys and training from addresses I didn't recognize, so I'd report those, too, only to be told they were legit ๐Ÿ˜‚

32
hemkoreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Yeah this is a running joke at our workplace too. Only to be asked by some manager to do those week or few later

3
SMITHandWESSONreply
lemmy.world

I send supervisor emails about stuff I'm not gonna do to my spam folder as well.....

"Did you get the email?"

"Nope, sorry, it looked a little suspicious so I didn't open and sent it to spam.."

11
lemmy.world

I just realised how you control reality at work and how much enjoyment you get.... Until you are enjoying too much and get fired

2

We do as well, except we only concern ourselves with the people who click them.

6

My workplace does this too. I can usually tell when the email isn't a legit phishing email but an IT test though. Not sure how helpful that is.

4
frickinehreply
lemmy.world

We get those, but the sender email shows up as [email protected] or whatever. Literally the most obvious possible address. I'm always tempted to forward one to IT and ask if they're serious with that shit.

3

Ours are the opposite: the sender's email shows up as a normal [email protected] email. Gmail is supposed to warn when a return address is being spoofed like that, but I guess my company turned that warning off for these fake phishing emails. There's still no SPF but I don't check the SPF unless an email looks suspicious so I hope that that warning will work for real, sophisticated phishing.

2
fidodoreply
lemm.ee

But if they're recognized it means they aren't doing a good enough job faking them

1

I always just ignore anything that looks dodgy, I can't be bothered to spend the time reporting emails when I get so damn many that are either spam or phishing

1
Perfide
reddthat.com

Nah, this isn't cool. Fuck the company, but this will fuck over the users more than anyone.

35
WereCatreply
lemmy.world

If company does not give a crap about employee then they don't about customer

37

companies care about money everything else is means for the purpes

7
kamen
lemmy.world

"I wonder why they'd need my 2FA too, but oh, well... "

26

Duo push more like duo push you off a cliff because you forgot to do your Spanish lessom

2
NoWay
lemmy.world

I might care if they paid me a living wage.

23

Iโ€™m all for acting your wage, but I donโ€™t want to make victims of anyone who is interacting with my company simply because I was feeling spiteful. The company will be fine, the tons of people who just had their information leaked are the ones who are truly inconvenienced and may face financial repercussions later on when their information is distributed. Just something to consider

33

I have to care about mine. If I cause a security breach, I can be sent to prison.

3
teft
startrek.website

A good portion of the movie Hackers was social engineering. That's how Mitnick got into a lot of systems as well. Why search for vulnerabilities in apps when people are much easier to manipulate.

16
azerial
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I wonder if that's how my old job had 780 gb of source stolen though social engineering.

12
xantoxisreply
lemmy.world

780 gb of source code? Sounds a bit overengineered, I bet that was hard to audit for security flaws

11

If there's 780 gb of source code, I doubt anyone there has the wherewithall to do security audits

7

As somone in IT who has to deal with executives I can assure you that high compensation has no correlation with good security practices :(

4