Fortunately for you I've got a bridge for sale. Are you smart enough to take this opportunity?
It'll go very soon, I've got a lot of buyers that want it. Buy today, or forever be the person who didn't buy that bridge at a bargain price. You in?
Because selling sex is much more about the teasing than the actual presentation. I'm convinced that the reason we don't have nude models selling you stuff on billboards is that the lingerie/just-before-the-bedroom clothes are more effective, so advertising companies don't care to get case law or actual legislation allowing nude advertisements.
I mean, if you just watch the scene that's linked there it makes it pretty clear. Nick (the fox) is pretending to stalk and kill Judy (the rabbit) by biting her neck. This specific frame is her intentionally over-acting dying after the reveal that it's fake.
Aye, it's like the 'sex scene' in lion king. When in the context of the film, you wouldn't even notice it as potentially lewd, but a single frame can appear pretty different.
Yeah, they play “can you feel the love tonight” over it and fade out shortly after the shot in question. The Zootopia frame may be taken out of context, but Lion King’s is absolutely what it looks like.
"All ages admitted. Nothing that would offend parents for viewing by children." for G
vs
"Some material may not be suitable for children. Parents urged to give "parental guidance". May contain some material parents might not like for their young children."
for PG
I mean when I see a G rated movie and a PG rated movie, I am not sure what it was that gave the PG rated movie the "higher" rating on the scale. It's already entirely subjective, but if it's rated PG I can't think of any content it would have that a G rated movie would not also have.
As a parent with young kids, G movies will literally have nothing scary at all. Both PG or G won't have vulgar words, but PG might have like "butt" or something very minorly offensive.
For example, in Zootopia, there are some "intense" scenes where the animals go feral and chase other animals. The chased animals look terrified for their lives. This can cause some younger kids to get scared/frightened by those scenes. In a G movie, there would be nothing that intense. Zootopia also has some innuendo humor, e.g. the scene where the fox takes the rabbit cop to an animal "nudist" yoga club. G movies wouldn't have that type of humor.
Hope that clears it up for you.
Edit: for the record, the scene in this post was edited and the fox's head position is never like that. I've seen the movie dozens of times, and while there may be some minor sexual innuendo, there is nothing so blatant as this
I think usually there’s more crude humor, possibly words like “damn”, “hell”, or “ass”, and it can be a little scarier/darker in PG movies versus G. But I agree that it seems pretty arbitrary and there’s no public list of what’s allowed in each that I’ve been able to find.
The reason there's no public list is the MPAA literally has a secret team called CARA (Classification and Rating Administration) who review works and assign ratings to them. The members of the CARA team are kept secret to prevent studios from bribing or otherwise influencing the panel members. CARA members are generally given a ton of leeway to assign ratings as they see fit, so while there might be a general practice of one swear word in a PG-13 film for example, this isn't a hard rule. There's also notable examples of CARA assigning ratings that were unexpected
If a movie still feels like its PG rating should be G then maybe it's just because of a minor detail (as viewed from a normal adult's perspective who isn't super sensitized in that matter) that changed it to be PG.
I bet a lot of studios aim for a G rating but fail because of some scenes. That would mean that many movies (PG and G) feel like they are aimed at roughly the same age group but some fail to cut a scene where, let's say a panda is taking a shower. The rating team says it's depicting nudity, even though a panda naturally doesn't wear clothes. It gets rated PG and feels like a G otherwise.
Something like that with a bit more back and forth between the raters and the studios, I guess.
It gets pretty spooky. They're are some creatures that are scary, some mood lighting that gets dark. Theyre are chases, and people being stabber and killed with snake venom. While theres no gore/blood, the themes are still there. That kind of thing makes it PG
oh boy, hope this doesn't awaken anything
Too late for Millennials. Lola Bunny in Space Jam (1996) already awakened something in
mesome peopleIt was over with Disneps Robin Hood from the 70s.
That Marian fox lady 🥵🥵🥵
I thought it said Disnep when I was little too!
And Lola bunny didn't do it for you? Haha
Oh no.... I'm in need of rescueeee
Aren’t we all
Disney Adults, an trending segment at Pornhub. I approve. 😀
The porn section joke is even more valid.
https://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/10/29/hoochie-coochie-man
gotta get that rescue russy
James Lee, is that you?
🥵
If it does, you'll be pleased(horrified?) to learn that there are over 39,000 posts tagged judy_hopps on e621.
Buddy, if they didn't want people jerking off to the rabbit they wouldn't have made her so sexy.
Can anyone tell me what Jim Rash has been up to in the past decade of so? I've got an itch for some Rash.
Look up a video of the scene (quote "You know you're milking it.") The position of the fox's head in the screenshot is edited.
How am I supposed to be gullible with folks like you on the internet?
Only the smart people know when to buy a bridge.
Fortunately for you I've got a bridge for sale. Are you smart enough to take this opportunity?
It'll go very soon, I've got a lot of buyers that want it. Buy today, or forever be the person who didn't buy that bridge at a bargain price. You in?
Can I pay in fridges?
If you're looking to get into the scrap metal business, I could sell you the Eiffel Tower.
Yeah, but you can still get pretty close to the same idea with the normal, I'd say. Good on the creator for making it a bit better.
Lmfao, how is the original shot somehow WORSE and more suggestive? Bahahahaha
Because selling sex is much more about the teasing than the actual presentation. I'm convinced that the reason we don't have nude models selling you stuff on billboards is that the lingerie/just-before-the-bedroom clothes are more effective, so advertising companies don't care to get case law or actual legislation allowing nude advertisements.
I didn't watch this. Tf happened here? It looks like furry r34...this is in the original!?!
I mean, if you just watch the scene that's linked there it makes it pretty clear. Nick (the fox) is pretending to stalk and kill Judy (the rabbit) by biting her neck. This specific frame is her intentionally over-acting dying after the reveal that it's fake.
Aye, it's like the 'sex scene' in lion king. When in the context of the film, you wouldn't even notice it as potentially lewd, but a single frame can appear pretty different.
Yes, that one, thank you.
It's telling that searching for "Nala bedroom eyes" gets you plenty of screenshots of it immediately.
I think those were deliberately “bedroom eyes” actually
Yeah, they play “can you feel the love tonight” over it and fade out shortly after the shot in question. The Zootopia frame may be taken out of context, but Lion King’s is absolutely what it looks like.
The more we explain this the worse it sounds, lmaoooooo
Well, Zootopia inspired so much of that (and maybe vice-versa?!) that you often can't tell.
This film is PG dumbass
What even is the real difference between G and PG? 🤔
"General Audiences" and "Parental Guidance"
So the Tweet isn't correct.
I know what they stand for, I'm just not sure what real difference there is in the content. They generally seem to be basically the same to me.
"All ages admitted. Nothing that would offend parents for viewing by children." for G
vs
"Some material may not be suitable for children. Parents urged to give "parental guidance". May contain some material parents might not like for their young children." for PG
Mayve I'm not explaining myself properly...
I mean when I see a G rated movie and a PG rated movie, I am not sure what it was that gave the PG rated movie the "higher" rating on the scale. It's already entirely subjective, but if it's rated PG I can't think of any content it would have that a G rated movie would not also have.
Does that make sense?
As a parent with young kids, G movies will literally have nothing scary at all. Both PG or G won't have vulgar words, but PG might have like "butt" or something very minorly offensive.
For example, in Zootopia, there are some "intense" scenes where the animals go feral and chase other animals. The chased animals look terrified for their lives. This can cause some younger kids to get scared/frightened by those scenes. In a G movie, there would be nothing that intense. Zootopia also has some innuendo humor, e.g. the scene where the fox takes the rabbit cop to an animal "nudist" yoga club. G movies wouldn't have that type of humor.
Hope that clears it up for you.
Edit: for the record, the scene in this post was edited and the fox's head position is never like that. I've seen the movie dozens of times, and while there may be some minor sexual innuendo, there is nothing so blatant as this
You are thinking only of the modern G rating. Go back in time a bit to find G rated movies like:
Just like society's thoughts on what is generally acceptable, the mpaa rating system has changed quite a lot over the years.
I think usually there’s more crude humor, possibly words like “damn”, “hell”, or “ass”, and it can be a little scarier/darker in PG movies versus G. But I agree that it seems pretty arbitrary and there’s no public list of what’s allowed in each that I’ve been able to find.
The reason there's no public list is the MPAA literally has a secret team called CARA (Classification and Rating Administration) who review works and assign ratings to them. The members of the CARA team are kept secret to prevent studios from bribing or otherwise influencing the panel members. CARA members are generally given a ton of leeway to assign ratings as they see fit, so while there might be a general practice of one swear word in a PG-13 film for example, this isn't a hard rule. There's also notable examples of CARA assigning ratings that were unexpected
You must not have kids
None that I know of, anyway.
I see. This site should clear things up: https://www.filmratings.com/ratings-guide/
If a movie still feels like its PG rating should be G then maybe it's just because of a minor detail (as viewed from a normal adult's perspective who isn't super sensitized in that matter) that changed it to be PG. I bet a lot of studios aim for a G rating but fail because of some scenes. That would mean that many movies (PG and G) feel like they are aimed at roughly the same age group but some fail to cut a scene where, let's say a panda is taking a shower. The rating team says it's depicting nudity, even though a panda naturally doesn't wear clothes. It gets rated PG and feels like a G otherwise.
Something like that with a bit more back and forth between the raters and the studios, I guess.
I don't think there really is a difference since the MPAA are a cabal of nutjobs who make decisions out of their asses.
PG just means "you can't get mad at us if your kid gets scared"
Its like good and p good? Or gay and probably gay? What do i know, they should use numbers
Yeah! Like 69, and 420.
A handshake agreement
What guidance from parents would kids watching Zootopia 2 need?
Well, it's a story that glorifies cops, and it completely fails to mention ACAB.
Good point!
If there's scary situations then it might not be appropriate for all kids, so films with action in night be PG.
Have you seen it?
It gets pretty spooky. They're are some creatures that are scary, some mood lighting that gets dark. Theyre are chases, and people being stabber and killed with snake venom. While theres no gore/blood, the themes are still there. That kind of thing makes it PG
This
Bunnylingus
Hare down there
Unless she's a Brazilian Cottontail.
My new word and concept for the day.
"Ah---AH----WHAT'S UP DOC!"
I thought it was Disney policy for animators to send any lude artwork they personally generate into a vault or otherwise isolated database?
they made a whole movie out of this one
No they didn't, and I will not be satisfied until I am proven wrong with a working link for verification purposes only...
They knew what they were up to.
Who's making art of quaaludes?
Where does the ice cream in zootopia come from? Who is milking who?
This is the quality I have come to expect from you
Glad I'm meeting expectations 🫡
Owwww noooes I don't wanna remember how she gets JFKed... That fucking comic....
I understood that reference. I think its missing perganant
What the hell did I just read and why the hell am I smiling so hard about it
It's from this old yt vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EShUeudtaFg
This is one of my favorite derivatives
Lmao holy shit.
Not an O-face, but a NO-face.
Ever hear of the vinegar strokes face?
The struggle just makes it hotter
Do you guys think she shaves there?
Are we furries or what?!
I mean.. I'm not.