Providing housing and paying them a shit wage is slave labor too but you get the benefit of them paying their money back into the company store so it's cheaper.
Here’s a reminder that there are nearly 14,000,000 vacant houses in America, and less than 650,000 homeless people. The math comes out to ~22 vacant houses for every single homeless person. I’ll give you one guess which income bracket owns the vast majority of those vacant houses…
It's "expensive" in the "right" way. The costs are paid by taxes, which are largely supplied by the 99%. The revenue, by contrast, is privatized, going to corporations owned by the 1%.
So it's only "expensive" for the masses, which lawmakers don't care about.
How about house them in a way that take away their voting rights and use them as cheap labor? Member how prisoners were used to fight the Palisades fires in January?
How about house them in a way that take away their voting rights and use them as cheap labor? Member how prisoners were used to fight the Palisades fires in January?
Don't forget the expensive housing is provided by a for-profit prison system. It's expensive for taxpayers, but someone else is getting rich.
It's not that expensive if you use them as slave labor and ignore their human rights... Well, still expensive for the tax payers, but who cares for those peasants? /s
It's an investment by the megacorps (with gov monies) into keeping the plebs in check, to not get any ideas around equity, social reform, tax increases, megacorp regulation (consumer prices/margins cap), higher wages, etc.
It's super effective.
The same infrastructure can also be recycled in event of a full-on fascist gov.
Not only that. The housing is then maintained by taxpayers, who are not the rich strata. So it's another way to funnel money from the poor/middle class to the corporation owned by the rich.
In particular if you look at the long term (even just a couple of years): many homeless just need a little help to start climbing the ladder again. So housing and mental care would allow them to quickly become productive members of society. Prisons just lock them into a circle of poverty.
Part of the debacle of giving homeless people free homes, would make everyone else wonder why TF we're working so hard for 90% of our net income to be sucked away by the housing industry just so we can keep a basic roof over our heads.
You mean IF I DIDN'T WORK AT ALL, the government would GIVE me a FREE house?? If that were the case, people would decide that laziness is more rewarding than hard honest work.
This is why the government doesn't give homes to homeless people. Although I read two days ago that in the USA there is a ratio of 27.4 empty houses per each homeless person.
But those houses must remain empty in the name of capitalism, for money-havers to do whatever they want with those houses. Anything but using it to house a needy, money-less person.
The fear of homelessness & starvation & suffering are what motivates everyone to keep working our asses off.
And after all that, any able-bodied people who still insist on sleeping & shitting on the streets & refusing to contribute to society & the economy, can be scooped up like kitty litter and dumped into for-profit prisons where they'll be assigned jobs.
Work & service to others, is the rent we all pay for living on this planet.
I'm sure every homeless person could have a home if they just tried harder! This isn't the most inhumane, cruel system ever!
I'm literally homeless too (I live in a van in order to have freedom, autonomy, and owe nothing to landlords or mortgage companies), and I see the housing industry for what it is, it wants to drain nearly every dime out of everyone, exploiting everyone's basic human need for shelter. It's extortion and I have no desire to be a victim or slave to it.
Yeah, I deleted because I originally misread/misinterpreted your comment as a defense for the system rather than criticism, being tired and all. Please dismiss what I said.
I wish you good luck and all the support you deserve and need to get out of this situation.
Ah yes thank you for understanding. I re-visited what I wrote & you're right, it can be interpreted two different ways, and you're right, I wrote it from a critical perspective, I despise what capitalism & the housing industry have done to us.
As far as me needing to escape my current living situation? I live in a brand new off-grid Mercedes Sprinter with solar panels & plumbing & refrigerator & convection oven. I can literally live anywhere I want without paying rent or mortgage, and I imagine most people would want to get out of THEIR situations to enjoy this type of freedom! I'm quite in bliss!
I've been seeing a bunch of people saying that he's not really anti-Zionist because he says Israel has a right to exist "as a state with equal rights" rather than saying they don't have a right to exist and that he's not actually a Lefty because he isn't making like huge sweeping promises before even getting into office officially.
It honestly just sounds like more "Holier Than Thou, I'm The Better Leftist" LARP that the Online Left seems to love engaging in.
Edit: Oh and people taking him talking about the talks he's had with Jewish New Yorkers about the whole "Globalize Intifada" smear the wrong way. I guess some have taken it as him capitulating to the Zionists when I guess to me it sounds more like he's just saying that he understands that he had a different view on what those words meant than other people apparently did not that he's changing his views or anything.
I'd personally be way more excited about Mamdani if he hadn't called Cuba and Venezuela dictatorships at a time when the US is ramping up aggression in the region. It really feels like helping manufacture consent and capitulating to the US empire. I hope he does a lot of good for y'all, but I personally don't trust him as a latina living in Latin America.
idk, from what I can find he only issued the statement calling them dictators after answering questions about those countries talking about the horrible things the US has done to them like the embargo on Cuba and the extrajudicial killings of Venezuelans Trump's been doing in which he didn't directly call them that.
I could definitely be reading too much into it, but it feels kinda like he's effectively saying "yeah, they're dictators because the US keeps interfering in their affairs"
I get that, I hope you're right, but it's still a disappointing statement coming from a leftist. I have a hard time thinking he doesn't know about Cuban democracy, but even if that's the case, does he believe Cuba is less democratic than the US, where Bernie got screwed over by the DNC, where gerrymandering and overpolicing make some states red for perpetuity, etc?
I wanna be hopeful but AOC was a massive letdown so I'm skeptical. But if I'm mistaken I'll be relieved. We all deserve decent politicians and policies.
idk, it's hard to say at the end of the day what is real belief and what is playing politics. Personally with what I'm seeing if a right leaning think tank like the Manhattan Institute is mad about what you're saying about Cuba and Venezuela then you're probably on the right track even if you did call them "dictatorships" in a later statement.
I absolutely feel being burned. I've been very disappointed in some of my more progressive officials in government lately. But right now IMO he's given no real tangible reason I've seen beyond things that have been said to doubt him. Until that point I'm willing to believe that the no condemnation interview version is the "real belief" and the "they're dictators" statement is a placating bit of politics playing after having said the important part first.
The cruelty is part of the fun! Plus prison = free slave labor!
/s
Providing housing and paying them a shit wage is slave labor too but you get the benefit of them paying their money back into the company store so it's cheaper.
Obviously, the solution is US slavery
And it only costs $80bn to do so!
One of the most obvious illustrations how capitalism socialise costs and privatises profits.
Here’s a reminder that there are nearly 14,000,000 vacant houses in America, and less than 650,000 homeless people. The math comes out to ~22 vacant houses for every single homeless person. I’ll give you one guess which income bracket owns the vast majority of those vacant houses…
Well duh, they're on the street because they're experiencing decision paralysis on what house to live in that day.
Phrase that differently or the wealthy will get the wrong idea.
That wasn't what I...
You know what, that works too.
I think this might have been about the "should not exist" party which could also mean "kill them all", in the billionaire's mind.
Alright, so let's kill 'em!
(Ambiguity is on purpose.)
They know goddamn well a big contingent is willing to if they had the opportunity, so they've gone to great lengths to avoid such possibilities.
This should intrigue people who like a challenge idk
Totally agree. What the fuck is a society that just cares about money and not people. Its not worth surviving.
The sad thing is that it has been like this for so damn long it isn't funny. And the people who like it this way will never go away.
It's "expensive" in the "right" way. The costs are paid by taxes, which are largely supplied by the 99%. The revenue, by contrast, is privatized, going to corporations owned by the 1%.
So it's only "expensive" for the masses, which lawmakers don't care about.
Not to mention the slave labor they gain out of it.
I was lumping that into "revenue"
👆 👆 These two guys/girls/dudes/men/women get it.
Just another way to extract surplus created by the 99%.
How about house them in a way that take away their voting rights and use them as cheap labor? Member how prisoners were used to fight the Palisades fires in January?
Don't forget the expensive housing is provided by a for-profit prison system. It's expensive for taxpayers, but someone else is getting rich.
It's not that expensive if you use them as slave labor and ignore their human rights... Well, still expensive for the tax payers, but who cares for those peasants? /s
How about organs? I'm about done with this liver and I could use a bigger penis.
Well, there WAS that thing a couple of months ago where Kilmeade said the quiet part out loud, suggesting we should execute them.
It's an investment by the megacorps (with gov monies) into keeping the plebs in check, to not get any ideas around equity, social reform, tax increases, megacorp regulation (consumer prices/margins cap), higher wages, etc.
It's super effective.
The same infrastructure can also be recycled in event of a full-on fascist gov.
Not only that. The housing is then maintained by taxpayers, who are not the rich strata. So it's another way to funnel money from the poor/middle class to the corporation owned by the rich.
Truth. The cheapest option is housing and mental health care.
In particular if you look at the long term (even just a couple of years): many homeless just need a little help to start climbing the ladder again. So housing and mental care would allow them to quickly become productive members of society. Prisons just lock them into a circle of poverty.
....and do absolutely fuck all to make the world a better place.
UBI when?
If these people were at all reasonable or giving a shit about anybody else, they wouldn't be ayncaps.
We? How about "we" remove the rich, so that homelessness is only a frie and true choice if you want to be traveling?
The only people who'd like there to be homeless people are the rich and powerful.
My area mentioned?
https://abc7.com/post/orange-county-supervisors-approve-anti-camping-ordinance-allowing-arrest-homeless/18117855/
You gotta feed those private prison shareholders!
Lib-right: We'll just make them work to cover their upkeep.
I'm unfamiliar with this bal—Is it a country or an ism?
An '-ism'. Specifically anarcho-capitalism.
I regret asking, but thank you for the clarification
Next stop: extermination.
There is an average of 45.9 empty homes in the U.S. for each person experiencing homelessness.
Move them into "Sanctuary Districts".
It isn't even really about the privatization. They just want the ability to game the investment scam system.
Unfortunately we deport them to the lowest bidder with a prison.
Meybe dey dum s'all I sayin.
Part of the debacle of giving homeless people free homes, would make everyone else wonder why TF we're working so hard for 90% of our net income to be sucked away by the housing industry just so we can keep a basic roof over our heads.
You mean IF I DIDN'T WORK AT ALL, the government would GIVE me a FREE house?? If that were the case, people would decide that laziness is more rewarding than hard honest work.
This is why the government doesn't give homes to homeless people. Although I read two days ago that in the USA there is a ratio of 27.4 empty houses per each homeless person.
But those houses must remain empty in the name of capitalism, for money-havers to do whatever they want with those houses. Anything but using it to house a needy, money-less person.
The fear of homelessness & starvation & suffering are what motivates everyone to keep working our asses off.
And after all that, any able-bodied people who still insist on sleeping & shitting on the streets & refusing to contribute to society & the economy, can be scooped up like kitty litter and dumped into for-profit prisons where they'll be assigned jobs.
Work & service to others, is the rent we all pay for living on this planet.
Moral hazards are bullshit
Could this not be solved by requiring work placement and maintaining a job to keep the free home?
Theb eventually they will want to own the home and end up striving to buy one.
Probably some programs like that do exist.
orc_ [email protected]
You said before deleting:
I'm literally homeless too (I live in a van in order to have freedom, autonomy, and owe nothing to landlords or mortgage companies), and I see the housing industry for what it is, it wants to drain nearly every dime out of everyone, exploiting everyone's basic human need for shelter. It's extortion and I have no desire to be a victim or slave to it.
Yeah, I deleted because I originally misread/misinterpreted your comment as a defense for the system rather than criticism, being tired and all. Please dismiss what I said.
I wish you good luck and all the support you deserve and need to get out of this situation.
Ah yes thank you for understanding. I re-visited what I wrote & you're right, it can be interpreted two different ways, and you're right, I wrote it from a critical perspective, I despise what capitalism & the housing industry have done to us.
As far as me needing to escape my current living situation? I live in a brand new off-grid Mercedes Sprinter with solar panels & plumbing & refrigerator & convection oven. I can literally live anywhere I want without paying rent or mortgage, and I imagine most people would want to get out of THEIR situations to enjoy this type of freedom! I'm quite in bliss!
Good on you! Wish you the best
Don't worry though, totally-not-zionist "lefty" Mandani got elected, he'll tots take care of the homeless and defo not fall into this pattern!
What?
They're a troll, this is a normal rage bait comment they make
It's jibberish. Might as well be calling Trump a TERF or complaining that Andrew Cuomo isn't Italian.
I've been seeing a bunch of people saying that he's not really anti-Zionist because he says Israel has a right to exist "as a state with equal rights" rather than saying they don't have a right to exist and that he's not actually a Lefty because he isn't making like huge sweeping promises before even getting into office officially.
It honestly just sounds like more "Holier Than Thou, I'm The Better Leftist" LARP that the Online Left seems to love engaging in.
Edit: Oh and people taking him talking about the talks he's had with Jewish New Yorkers about the whole "Globalize Intifada" smear the wrong way. I guess some have taken it as him capitulating to the Zionists when I guess to me it sounds more like he's just saying that he understands that he had a different view on what those words meant than other people apparently did not that he's changing his views or anything.
I'd personally be way more excited about Mamdani if he hadn't called Cuba and Venezuela dictatorships at a time when the US is ramping up aggression in the region. It really feels like helping manufacture consent and capitulating to the US empire. I hope he does a lot of good for y'all, but I personally don't trust him as a latina living in Latin America.
idk, from what I can find he only issued the statement calling them dictators after answering questions about those countries talking about the horrible things the US has done to them like the embargo on Cuba and the extrajudicial killings of Venezuelans Trump's been doing in which he didn't directly call them that.
I could definitely be reading too much into it, but it feels kinda like he's effectively saying "yeah, they're dictators because the US keeps interfering in their affairs"
I get that, I hope you're right, but it's still a disappointing statement coming from a leftist. I have a hard time thinking he doesn't know about Cuban democracy, but even if that's the case, does he believe Cuba is less democratic than the US, where Bernie got screwed over by the DNC, where gerrymandering and overpolicing make some states red for perpetuity, etc?
I wanna be hopeful but AOC was a massive letdown so I'm skeptical. But if I'm mistaken I'll be relieved. We all deserve decent politicians and policies.
idk, it's hard to say at the end of the day what is real belief and what is playing politics. Personally with what I'm seeing if a right leaning think tank like the Manhattan Institute is mad about what you're saying about Cuba and Venezuela then you're probably on the right track even if you did call them "dictatorships" in a later statement.
I absolutely feel being burned. I've been very disappointed in some of my more progressive officials in government lately. But right now IMO he's given no real tangible reason I've seen beyond things that have been said to doubt him. Until that point I'm willing to believe that the no condemnation interview version is the "real belief" and the "they're dictators" statement is a placating bit of politics playing after having said the important part first.