Spyke

I'm grateful for the fact that she's as popular as she is with her constituents, because I am damned sure that there are plenty within the Dems who would like to see her gone for shining a light on the fact that they're still mostly greedy, capitalist cunts

159
NatakuNoxreply
lemmy.world

Most of the party are spineless neoliberal capitalist bootlickers. Our democracy needs a major overhaul. It's obvious it pools too much power in too few hands.

50
lemmy.world

It won't change. Money Controls our media and the media sways people's votes. Media is not just the regular news anymore, people are watching influencers, on social media and believing the paid fake shit they saying. We need laws about mass information that lies.

7
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Jesus Christ. You were the genius telling peasants the king would always be in charge. Grow a spine.

5

I mean they're not wrong about needing laws against spreading mass misinformation/disinformation though. Allowing Fox to keep spreading lies under the guise of "entertainment" while holding the name Fox news is an egregious act of propagandic bullshit.

2
lemmy.world

While this is right on...one thing:

Incompetence that invincible, probably, is malice.

6
lemmynsfw.com

Oh, it's totally because they're busy looking out for themselves, not the people they're supposed to serve

2

Totally because they are looking out for the billionaires, the people they are supposed to serve

2

And that's what gives (me) hope.
Were all as bleak as the rest, I'd hope for a hit by a meteor of the mass extinction event type.
...but there still is hope for change.

5
lemmy.world

We didn't just get nothing, we lost ACA subsidies and hemp products. It was 40+ days that gave republicans a platform to blame Dems, and then they got a royal flush when 12 Democrats across Congress ate a shit sandwich for fun.

My expectations were low, but somehow establishment Democrats proved that they aren't just worthless, but a liability.

89
MimicJarreply
lemmy.world

Also,

According to the bill text, senators may seek up to $500,000 in statutory damages if their phone records are subpoenaed without their knowledge. 

The language is inside one of the three full-year spending bills that the Senate included in its government funding package.

"Any Senator whose Senate data, or the Senate data of whose Senate office, has been acquired, subpoenaed, searched, accessed, or disclosed in violation of this section may bring a civil action against the United States if the violation was committed by an officer, employee, or agent of the United States or of any Federal department or agency," the bill reads.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/provision-government-funding-bill-allows-senators-sue-secretly/story?id=127429007

So 8 Senators who had their phone records subpoenaed as part of the Jan 6 investigation get a $500,000+ payout.

37
BassTurdreply
lemmy.world

It thought I read that it was on a per subpoena basis, so in reality it's 1,000,000+ per senator.

I try to not think to deep into this shit because that implies there's something other that nefarious intentions, but I don't understand how this can possibly be legal or even feasible. Like, there's a lot of heinous shit that Republicans have done on a consistent basis, but to somehow write payouts like this into a bill and then, that's just it, is mind boggling. I hope they all choke on their tongues and die in fear.

8

I've read similar that it is per subpoena, but I haven't found an article with a more detailed analysis yet.

Now technically in the article I linked Speaker Johnson says he'll hold a vote to remove that clause, but even if he's being genuine I'm guessing it won't pass in the Senate or will be vetoed by Trump.

The whole this just kicking someone (the United States) while they're down. Longest shutdown. SNAP benefits halted. ACA subsidies expired. Hemp outlawed. Senator payouts... And this current "victory" only lasts until the end of January. Just long enough for the wounds to start healing before we all get kicked down again.

6
Gates9reply
sh.itjust.works

How many times do the Democrats need to twist and contort and go waaaaay out of their way to steal defeat from the jaws of victory for it to form a clear composite picture of collaboration?

29
chaogomureply
lemmy.world

I didn't see the loss of hemp products... What was that?

13
BassTurdreply
lemmy.world

It was a provision included in the bill by none other than that ghoul McConnell. I don't have a good link to share, but a search for "block on hemp products" yields some relevant articles.

Effectively it will ban THC derivatives, CBD, and other hemp based products. I'm seeing numbers like 95% of the hemp industry would fucked.

19
midwest.social

Absolutely wild choice by McConnell, considering one of the only things Kentucky has a better reputation for than being backwater is growing hemp/weed

4
lemmy.world

So disappointing. She only notes when she could have slams.

82
slothropreply
lemmy.ca

She considered eviscerating but was skewered.

39
nullreply
piefed.nullspace.lol

Remember yesterday when she was a disgusting traitor because she hadn't commented yet?

-8
Taldanreply
lemmy.world

No, actually I never heard that. Where are you getting that from?

7
lemmy.zip

You found two people, both of whom were massively down voted. Just a couple assholes trying to sow division.

4

He hates leftists more than he hates fascists and their allies, so any straws he can grasp are fair game to him.

Never mind the votes he claims happened after he linked it, when lemvotes shows it happened before he posted and edited his comment.

But sure, he's the smart guy, not everyone else calling him wrong.

1

Mm, I gave one example of a thread that is definitely not massively downvoted, and then came back later when I saw the comment I linked to. Good that it's been heavily downvoted.

-1

It was 100% about EBT for Thanksgiving. The Dems still don't realize that The political games of the past aren't working anymore against an opponent who has no agenda beyond punishing his political rivals.

Trump wants to destroy anything that he even thinks is left leaning. He doesn't give a shit about renewable energy but democrats do therefore wind turbines are his enemy.

College educated people are less likely to vote republican therefore all universities are his enemy.

I'll bet he doesn't even understand the concept of fascism or even what a dictator is. All he cares about is hearing "yes". All he wants is the obsequiousness he sees other leaders get.

Never forget that at his core he is a barely literate diaper wearing spoiled brat with a room temperature IQ. The day he leaves will become a national holiday.

42

I'll bet he doesn't even understand the concept of fascism or even what a dictator is.

Maybe he's born with it.

Maybe it's Mussolini.

15
samus12345reply
sh.itjust.works

He does know what a dictator is - he promised he'd be one on day one. Once of the few promises he's kept.

10

Their agenda is to destroy the entire administrative state. They want a US that is from before FDR.

2

We don’t need another tyrant. She is doing just fine with her responses. Active on social media, speaking out and pointing out the hypocrisy in her speeches. Can’t ask for much more from a person with integrity.

-5

THE PROGRESSIVES NEED TO MAKE ANOTHER PARTY.

The DNC has proven they will capitulate to Republicans to maintain the status quo every single time.

11

Turns out it doesn’t usually work like that.

You can cut his tie off with scissors too, but that also won’t change things until midterms. Might be fun tho.

0
lemmy.world

I haven't look into it with any depth, but I kind of feel recall elections should be possible especially for US Senators.

5
lemmy.world

They're not. It's absolutely something that should have been implemented, but there just isn't any mechanism for legally ousting sitting Senators other than them being indicted on criminal charges. Otherwise Fetterman would have been gone ages ago and would never have been able to participate in this farcical "deal".

8

Senators can be expelled if 67 of them vote for it, but that's about it. Which means if the Republicans ever got 67 Senators, there would never be a Democrat or Independent in there again.

4

It got some assholes some air-time. I would like to thank Kaine for making Hillary's loss years ago easier to swallow. "How could she lose to-- oh, now I 'member."

3