Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on midwest.social

46 replies

lemmy.world

Y'all talkin bout Hitler?

Can't do that anymore, being anti fascist is illegal.

78
sh.itjust.works

Really? There's usually a little stooge country in the middle east that follows suit.

9
lemmy.today

Israel. They are talking about Israel. Although the UK is kinda following suit as well, the US is funding Israel's current bullshit.

3

Well Saudi Arabia is also a stooge country of the US in the Middle East.

2
db2
lemmy.world

Not me. I can think of a dozen people off the top of my head the world would be better without.

36
db2reply
lemmy.world

If we're being entirely honest in our numbers here we're going to sound like murderous psychopaths though 🤣

19
discuss.tchncs.de

70 million people.

That's what it will take to rid us of the top 1%.

Of course, if we're going after the global 1% then that will be anyone making over approximately $55k USD per year.

9
db2reply
lemmy.world

Those numbers sound wrong. I make that and barely scrape by, and that's without stupid shit like a boat or a big truck or anything remotely like that.

12

Yes that's how many poor people there are in the world that you, with your modest wage, is still in the global 1%

Let that sit with you a moment. Puts things into perspective. Now think of the billionaires that exist.

7

You are not filthy rich if you depend on a salary. And that's not FU money basically anywhere.

2

So that's the thing... in the US even our poor are rich compared to the global poor.

But you're right, people in the US making $50k a year aren't really the problem. The problem is the people who have the average income of the 1%. That's people making almost $500k a year. Which is crazy to think that the income needed to join the global 1% is so much lower than the average income of the 1%.

2

It's more like 7000 people really fucking everything up, the 1% just sounds better then the 0.00001%

6

yeah, i was talking about this with one of my conservative relatives and they were pretty excited cheney's gone too

2

The new people slang makes this confusing for me. In this context, I'm supposed to know that the baddies are in fact on the wrong side of history, correct? We're not talking about bombastic bombshells. See what I did there?

22

Yeah. No need to sugar coat it. I ran into a couple Charlie Kuck supporters at a bar a few weeks ago and when they brought him up my response was

"Assassination isn't great for our society, but I'm super glad he's dead."

When they started babbling back at me I just said

"The real question here is why you're sad a bad person is dead."

And then I just walked away because why waste my time with idiots?

20
midwest.social

I find the sentiment is timeless but yes I realized there wasn't nearly enough Sammy J in the community response over the past couple weeks and feel like people need to be properly educated for the next time.

9
Some people should die
That's just unconscious knowledge
Because, because the bigger you get, the wider you spread - Jane's Addiction
12
lemmy.ml

16 hours ago

So uhh any thoughts on those Powerball numbers?

12
fedia.io

Did something new happen that i missed? I'm on a serious news diet

12
midwest.social

No I've just noticed a distressing lack of the proper reaction pics and need to be sure everyone's stocked up for the next time

14
db2reply
lemmy.world

When it happens this is going everywhere. Maybe even in every comment anywhere. Feel free to join in.

23

I have a bottle of wine set aside and will go through an ounce of weed in a week. That's going to be a party

3
Beaconreply
fedia.io

That's not a new event, that happened a couple decades ago

8

Bro, that stuff we did six to eight hours ago was SICK! All the hot people having fun and the street performer we saw! Can't wait to do that stuff with you again!

5

You reached the end