Spyke
fedia.io

“You know, the new thing is magnets. So instead of using hydraulic that can be hit by lightning and it’s fine. You take a little glass of water, you drop it on magnets, I don’t know what’s going to happen,” Trump said.

He thinks that magnets can be foiled by water.

172
lemmy.world

The race to the bottom of intelligence is neck and neck between Donald Trump himself and the slack jawed bozos that vote for him. There is no winner to the "Lights Are On, But They Are Motion Sensor" Award.

74

The morons voting him as the leader are by FAAAR the bigger morons. Like magnitudes bigger. He's gifting those morons straight to the bank.

1
lemmy.billiam.net

I think what’s he’s getting confused about is that they’re using electromagnets, which the circuitry of could certainly be damaged by water.

I suspect someone at some point communicated some kind of potential problem the navy could be having, and he just went “magnets + water = bad, got it”. Which is what I think the real point should be here. It’s not so much that the president is confused about how magnets work, its more that someone at some point mentioned some kind of existing or potential situation and he is just spewing it back out without really understanding it.

Like basically the president of the fucking United States is not capable of understanding someone telling him that electromagnets can be damaged by water and/or is unable to communicate that basic concept.

40
Triumphreply
fedia.io

Never mind every other fucking electronic thing on a modern aircraft carrier.

Nobody tell him that fighter jets sink in the water, he'll have all the carriers decommissioned because "Planes don't go on water. Why are we sending airplanes into the ocean, they'll just sink!"

48

Yeah, see, you don't need to worry about planes sinking in the water if you don't take them out in the water. Melt all the carriers down and make shitty branded watches out of them to sell to dopes for way too much money.

6
WindyRebelreply
lemmy.world

With the economy as it is, we may all need to switch to Faygo.

14
blattrulesreply
lemmy.world

He STILL thinks this somehow after saying it like 18 months ago too. I don’t know how no one told him he sounds like a fucking moron after the first time he said it publicly.

19

Because he surrounds himself with sycophants. Anyone who would have pushed back is gone.

6

Someone probably did tell him. But he forgot. Because he's old, and probably has dementia.

4

He’s right though, he doesn’t know what’s going to happen…

19
AA5Breply
lemmy.world

The article has a translation

The elderly president was talking about the magnetic catapults used to launch planes from the latest Navy super carriers, the USS Gerald R. Ford class, and the electromagnetic elevators used to move weaponry to the flight deck. Both systems double the speed with which planes can be armed and launched but slowed the delivery and commissioning

If you remember the news a few years back there were all sorts of delays and problems caused by switching from hydraulics to magnetic/electrical. It’s probably a vague memory of more complexity than he can handle. A sane president would have had someone with expertise go over his speech

It was the first time so as long as all the issues have been worked out and the next one is smoother, we’re good

16
mander.xyz

During his first term, he wanted to keep using steam, then somebody explained that magnets are better and steam kinda sucks

6

I can't tell if this is true or not.

Considering that Trump has taken ignorance-based misinformation to a whole new level, it seems only fitting that "that sounds so absurd, it's plausible he said that" has and/or will become part of his legacy.

1

I honestly don’t remember what specific problems they had during development but it’s easy to believe dealing with harsh environment at sea for long periods was one of them. You can probably look them up easily enough. It’s got moving parts and high power electronics on an open deck and the boat can be at sea for months …

0

He once owned an iron magnet which got wet and then rusted? That is probably still too logical for him but it's the only kind of plausible chain of thought I can come up with.

12

I can only assume that the spirochetes in his brain are dying off, and all that's left up there is cat food.

6
lemmy.world

“You know, the new thing is magnets. So instead of using hydraulic that can be hit by lightning and it’s fine. You take a little glass of water, you drop it on magnets, I don’t know what’s going to happen,” Trump said.

“So, you know, the elevators come up in the new carriers—I think I’m going to change it, by the way—they have magnets. Every tractor has hydraulic, every excavator, every excavating machine of any kind has hydraulic. But somebody decided to use magnets.”

The 79-year-old president then stumbled over his words and failed to complete a coherent sentence before moving on and asking the watching troops whether they preferred hydraulics or magnets.

Trump then called out to a “top-ranking general” in the crowd for his opinion before continuing his tirade against the 2,000-year-old technology.

b/w

85
danekraereply
lemmy.world

The 79-year-old president then stumbled over his words and failed to complete a coherent sentence

Has he ever been able to complete a coherent sentence?

46
fonix232reply
fedia.io

About 15 years ago, yes. There were a few videos of him talking borderline eloquently about political issues, but then again back then he was supporting the Democrats.

I'm more and more suspecting that like Fetterman, he had a stroke too that put him down this path.

17
foodandartreply
lemmy.zip

Oh, he's definitely been having mini strokes, for years. That or the adderal induced lack of sleep is creating psychosis in him.

Or, and this is most likely, he's just following his own father into the maw of dementia - and that is his personal terror, if the history about his family that I've read, is correct.

11

Or, and this is most likely, he's just following his own father into the maw of dementia

Father, grandfather, and sister.

7
LillyPipreply
lemmy.ca

He’s said some incredibly stupid things, but this is next level.

The hamster powering his brain is clearly just a rotting pile of sludge now. How can anyone look at this masterclass in utter ignorance and see anything other than a senile old fool who should be in a nursing home for his own protection?

Nearly 80% of republicans think this is okay? What wouldn’t they think is okay from him? It seems they’d be fine with his actual corpse being wheeled round on a trolley by Vance & co. Astounding.

30

I had to double check to make sure I wasn't reading The Onion. These word salads are literally on the level of a parody of the orange turdsack.

8
Optionalreply
lemmy.world

Oh, no, you mean like he'd ever learn anything.

That's a nope.

3
Rekorsereply
sh.itjust.works

You should note at least that this poll is of 2000 people in Geprgia.

5
lemmy.ml

They'll just keep propping him up, telling everyone he's fine, and they will believe it

22
tpyoreply
lemmy.world

That article is unfortunately gone and I couldn't find the link on the archive sites I know

That second one was a nothing burger really, but I wonder if it's the same (the second link is from April of this year)

2

Every mainstream media outlet talking about Biden at 79: "He's so incredibly OLD!!!!!!"

Talking about Trump: (anything but his age)

45
sh.itjust.works

Since 2014 or whenever he started campaigning I've been wondering why any sane person would offer that dimwit a microphone.
Apparently there are far fewer sane people than I had hoped.
Or the insane ones somehow ended up in influential positions more often.

41
Madison420reply
lemmy.world

They don't listen to the speech, they listen to sound bites out of context while some pseudo intellectual tells them how it made the libs cry while trying to get them to purchase unregulated supplements and boner pills to "support the cause" ie. Pay them.

20

exactly. And they've made up a term for it to make him sound smarter than he really is.

They call "the weave".

As if Trump is masterfully moving from subject to subject, connecting dots, seeing the patterns.... and not, ya know, fucking rambling like a senile old person.

11
SkaveRatreply
discuss.tchncs.de

Bad example, because President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho wanted to improve things and (at least in the end) actually listened to the smartest guy around

11

The fool was always given a dunce cap (maybe gold plated made in China in this case) and placed in a corner to spout his gibberish.

I’ve been wondering why any sane person would listen to this fool and even vote for him. Do they even listen to what comes out of his mouth?

3

Stupid people in America believed some obvious bullshit claims made on a literal reality TV show.

1
slrpnk.net

He let slip he had an MRI recently, which explains why magnets are on the brain. Very interesting

27
ripcordreply
lemmy.world

As you can see from the article he seems to be obsessed with them in general.

5

This is starting to get dangerously close to some SCP-1981 shit.

(I know, I know, real life already vastly surpassed all potential of art in the realm of presidential incomprehensibility in Trump's first term.)

25
lemmy.ca

Trump, 79, Gets Confused Explaining Water to the Navy

You can save letters if you just stop there. It will work for the next 400 articles until the orange mayonnaise golem is called back by the witch that created him out of blob of smegma and tanning spray.

17

Hey now, let's leave disparaging witches to the puritanical hypocrites, eh? 🤌🏼

Satan loves us all equally. 🤘🏼❤️‍🔥

Except MAGAts. I hear he'd really rather not have them around at all.

7

/me looks around.

...

Ctrl+F O N I O N

...

Huh. Satire writers really are having a tough time right now.

17
lemmy.ca

Someone please edit the Wikipedia page for magnets to add the fact that water cancels them out.

13

Believe it or not, this has something to do with China trade policy. He’s rambled before about China controlling rare earth magnets. I believe magnets were specifically called out in the first China trade ”deal.”

Someone has clearly told this doddering old fool that China produces most of the world’s rare earth magnets, and being stupid, he drew the conclusion that magnets = China = bad.

Stop this ride, I want to get off.

12
lemmy.world

Wait until he finds out that brake fluid is hygroscopic.

11

Ooh, wow, careful with those fancy words there. That sounds something like what some nerd scientist would say.

5

Or Trump could become a real dumbass when it turns into "Trump, 79, Gets Confused Trying to Explain Navy to the Water". giggle

8
lemmy.world

This sounds like a freaking Seinfeld bit "So WHAT'S the deal with MAGNETS?"

7
  • Urge to share weird hot takes in public long after their hit NBC shows left the airwaves
  • Eaned far more than they’re worth
  • Too much interest in high schoolers
  • Unwavering support for genocide
5
lemmy.world

I think what he was trying to say is that the water was going to short-circuit the magnet.

5
ThePantserreply
sh.itjust.works

The article says magnets discovered by Chinese in 200 BC so a little over 2000 years. I am not a historian to verify though.

5

Greek legends go back about 4000. But records have Greece using them around 600 bc. China started using the compass around 200bc, with some records of magnets exist to around 400bc.

2

I always found it funny that friends and family who have been in the military have told me if I want to fly planes in the military, I should join the Navy instead of the Air Force and if I want to work on a ship to join the Coast Guard or Marines.

4
lemmy.zip

I wonder if the DOD brass thought that “..Taking America back to when it was great..” meant we’d be using 1950’s technology as well.

Hmmm.

4

Not to mention repeating the complete lie that Biden claimed he was a pilot, in the military and a truck driver.

Edit: Downvote? Show me where Biden claimed he was a pilot.

3

Only vaguely related... switching to magnets makes me think of top gun.
Officer: [in the midst of the MIG battle] Both Catapults are broken, sir. Stinger: How long will it take? Officer: It'll take ten minutes. Stinger: Bullshit ten minutes! This thing will be over in two minutes! Get on it!

1

Isn't water a highly unusual polar molecule?

Let's not pretend that water is simple to understand. Anyone whose tried to measure it in a graduated cylinder knows this.

1
lemmy.ml

Saltwater does in fact aggressively corrode neodymium magnets. About as fast as a piece of raw iron. On top of that, the saltwater can induce currents in magnetic systems that can wreak havoc. There is truth to what Trump is saying. It seems like people are assuming Trump thinks water cancels out magnetism, but I don't see that.

Report: Carrier USS Ford's Electromagnetic Systems Still Need Work New aircraft launch and recovery systems still break down too often, according to the Pentagon's testing office

https://navalaviationnews.navy.mil/Editorial-Staff-Tools/Article-Submission/Article/3022833/how-naval-aviation-is-solving-its-billion-dollar-corrosion-problem/

https://www.stanfordmagnets.com/how-to-avoid-neodymium-magnet-corrosion.html

-8
Kamireply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

However he mentioned pouring a glass of water.

Nice try though.

6
blattrulesreply
lemmy.world

It could be because he said it like this:

“You know, the new thing is magnets. So instead of using hydraulic that can be hit by lightning and it’s fine. You take a little glass of water, you drop it on magnets, I don’t know what’s going to happen.”

3
Ferrousreply
lemmy.ml

Which is 100 percent correct... you can drop a single drop of tap water onto a magent, and it will corrode. This is nothing new to aquarium enthusiasts.

Did he say it like a dumbass? Yes. Is he a dumbass? Yes. But there is truth to what he's saying. Criticisms of the man should be strategic and pointed, otherwise you risk discrediting yourself to right wingers.

-5
pawb.social

You're sane-washing a madman. It's like when he suggested piping UV light into your veins to cure COVID... Yes, purifying blood using UV is a real area of research, but his take away is nonsense. You have to squint, change half the concept, and then ignore all practical considerations to make that make sense

Pay attention to what he's actually suggesting - replacing our extremely advanced magnetic launch system with hydronics. They would have way more parts, fail more catastrophically, and would not be able to launch nearly as much weight

This is not a serious option... It's a misunderstanding of something thrown out in a brainstorm

6
Ferrousreply
lemmy.ml

They would have way more parts, fail more catastrophically

This remains to be seen. In fact, the opposite is proving true.

https://maritime-executive.com/article/report-carrier-uss-ford-s-electromagnetic-systems-still-need-work

USS Ford's launch and recovery gear are electromagnetically actuated, a departure from the steam-operated Nimitz-class carriers. The new designs were developed and installed because they promised longer intervals between maintenance and higher sortie generation rates. Though the Navy remains upbeat about Ford's capabilities, these gains have proven elusive. "The reliability of CVN 78 catapults, arresting gear, and jet blast deflectors (JBDs) continues to have an adverse effect on sortie generation and flight operations efficiency," noted DOT&E in an annual report released in mid-January. "The ongoing reliability problems with these critical subsystems remains the primary risk to the successful completion of CVN 78 [initial operational testing and evaluation]."

The carrier's Advanced Arresting Gear (AAG) has similar challenges. The AAG is supposed to cycle 16,500 times between failures, but in recent testing it has broken down after roughly 450 cycles.

Belowdecks, the Ford's Advanced Weapons Elevator (AWE) elevator system remains a source of trouble. During a weapons onload in September, the lower stage elevators performed more quickly than those on a Nimitz-class carrier, DOT&E said; however, 109 elevator failures were reported out of about 20,000 elevator dispatches. "AWE system reliability will be critical as the Navy develops standard procedures for moving ordnance from magazines to the flight deck," noted DOT&E.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/craighooper/2022/10/14/in-a-first-deployment-test-uss-ford-fails-to-beat-nimitz-class-benchmarks/

In a first ordnance-handling test, the advanced weapons elevators on the USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78), America’s new, $13.3 billion supercarrier, offered little to no meaningful improvement over the legacy elevator systems aboard America’s venerable $5 billion Nimitz class carriers.

Crew claimed they “were able to run ammo downstairs in the magazines much quicker because we were able to put extra weight on the elevator, able to run it down quicker, which means you have to run those cycles a lot less.” That sounds great, but unbiased analysis of the Ford’s performance during the carrier’s initial two-and-a-half day ammunition onload cycle suggests the Navy has yet to take full advantage of Ford’s eleven faster and stronger elevators. Put bluntly, all the high-tech electromagnetic elevators aboard the USS Ford failed to translate into a faster ordnance onload cycle. It calls a primary pillar of the Ford’s business case—that new ammunition handling techniques would yield vast performance benefits and make the ship less vulnerable—into question.

-1
pawb.social

Those articles are from 2022, when they were still shaking things out in real world usage. Since then the bugs have been slowly but consistently ironed out. It happens every time with defense development these days.

They're looking to expand use of the system, because it is just all around better. There's fewer parts, it's faster, smaller, and lighter. That means smaller aircraft carriers

This is a non issue, Trump just doesn't like "electric". And yeah, I'm sure he heard about problems in development and latched onto that in his first term, but really it's about rare earth magnets from China... Which these systems use, along with just about everything else these days

Not to mention, these systems are smaller and lighter ... is it even possible to retrofit a steam launch system on the all electric carriers built around this?

1
Ferrousreply
lemmy.ml

Since then the bugs have been slowly but consistently ironed out.

This just came straight out your ass. Where can you find a source for this? Show me anything that corroborates. Yall are just digging in now thay you know youre wrong. Its obvious that you are completely oblivious to the throws of this recent carrier class and the associated new technologies - which have been consistently problematic for years now.

2025:

https://www.businessinsider.com/us-navy-still-struggling-with-elevators-on-ford-aircraft-carriers-2025-4

2025:

https://nationalsecurityjournal.org/the-new-ford-class-aircraft-carriers-have-a-warning-for-the-u-s-navy/

2025:

https://www.energy-reporters.com/news/they-spent-13-billion-on-a-mistake-uss-gerald-fords-electromagnetic-catapults-keep-failing-and-navy-cant-fix-them/?hl=en-US#%3A%7E%3Atext=A+key+feature+of+this%2Cby+reducing+stress+on+aircraft.

1

If you actually read those articles you just linked, you'll find the titles are click bait. The program has massive cost overruns, just like the F35. And similarly, it's had issues, but the F35 is an incredibly advanced aircraft now

But the navy expects to hit the promised performance metrics by 2030. They're moving forward with the program, even considering expanding it into ground based systems

The navy can indeed fix their electronic catapults, I don't know if that last one is AI or what, but the entire article is a huge puff piece about the advantages of the ship

🚢 The USS Gerald R. Ford is the world’s largest and most technologically advanced aircraft carrier, powered by nuclear reactors.

💡 Featuring the groundbreaking Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS), it enhances sortie rates and minimizes airframe stress.
🌍 As a key element of U.S. naval strategy, it plays a significant role in global power projection and deterrence efforts.
🛠 Despite facing construction challenges and budget overruns, it remains adaptable to future technologies like advanced drones.

And another piece of the business insider article

The inclusion of the elevators and EMALS was paired with overall ship layout changes as well.

This relates to my other point... Is it even possible to retrofit a steam system on the Ford and Kennedy?

President Donald Trump has previously been critical of both the catapults and the weapons elevators on the Ford, expressing concern about the use of magnets in the advanced technology.

The Navy officials who testified before Congress Tuesday said the "Navy and shipbuilder HII-NNS are hyper-focused on a CVN 79 delivery plan that results in the fastest path to a combat ready CVN, crew, and air wing."

So yeah. There's been problems, the budget is out of control, but the tech is only improving

1
blattrulesreply
lemmy.world

If only there was something that could be done to prevent the corrosion, like coating them or using them inside a sealed mechanism. It’s not trumps job to tell engineers who are infinitely more intelligent than him how to do their job.

3

Giving rare earth magnets a waterproof coating is nothing new. They are still extremely susceptible to corrosion, especially in seawater applications.

-3

Salt water corrodes nearly everything. It's the salt.

Why would you give this man the benefit of the doubt at this point?

1
leadorereply
lemmy.world

It doesn't really matter what scientific information has been given about magnets, we see before us what his brain turned it into.

1
Ferrousreply
lemmy.ml

It actually does matter when you have an entire thread of people decrying Trump's supposed lack of understanding of magnets - while simultaneously pushing completely incorrect ideas about magents and laying bare their own lack of understanding of magnets.

Especially annoying when you can do one single Google search and read a plethora of sources that explain in great scientific detail just how susceptible magnets are to water - especially in seawater applications.

-4
leadorereply
lemmy.world

You might read the article where that line about dropping a glass of water on a magnet and he doesn't know what will happen is just one example of a long pattern of his complaining about magnets (and sorry to disappoint you but drop a glass of water on a magnet and nothing will happen).

I suspect the whole ranting about magnets relates to the trade war with China which is by far our main source of rare earth materials including for rare earth magnets, and he seems of generalize them to all magnets. But the point is he says he's going to sign an EO that they can't use the magnetic elevators on aircraft carriers because of his mindset about magnets. Sure, I guess if the ship sank, there could be damage to the magnets in the new elevators, but that wouldn't exactly be the biggest problem at that point.

2

omg. trump said "drop a glass of water on it and I don't know what'll happen"--as if the brief amount of time a glass of water ran over the magnet would ruin it. He didn't say soak it in water or keep it wet for a long period of time. Obviously metal rusts over time if not kept dry. You're grasping at straws trying to defend trump.

3