Spyke
lemmy.radio

I do love when this happens. I could probably think of more examples if I took the time, but the first that immediately springs to mind is Buffy the Vampire Slayer pulling a rocket launcher on a vampire.

148

Well, if it's a shaped explosion round, aka HEAT, then it 'forges' a jet of molten copper upon detonation, that is what 'cuts' though armor plate. Pedantic, yes. Technically not forged by human hands, also yes.

3

I love BtVS, but bruh she just fired an AT4 at a demon inside a mall. Backblast Whedon wtf. The wall is literally right behind her.

2
lemmy.world

Wasn’t that supposed to be a big fight scene but Harrison Ford was sick? So they audibled to this?

51

Yeah, he was sick from drinking the local water, and was trying not to shit his pants from the diarrhea. He was also running an awful fever; Indy looks so sweaty in this scene because Harrison was running like a 103 fever.

19
lemmy.world

Audible is a term for changing from a designed play to a new one on the fly.

26
marcosreply
lemmy.world

If I understood that correctly, a game play, as a specific term for US Football. And gets that name by people screaming the new play.

Audible is something you can hear.

10

oh right, that would explain why so many people in this thread, including me, had no idea what they were on about.

5

Yeah, this is the first / most widely known instance of this trope that I am aware of, call it the Indiana Jones manuever maybe?

4
Manjushrireply
piefed.social

Just had the same thought. I don't think I've watched it since I was a kid and saw it in the theater. When I stumble on an old movie like this, I always like to check who was in it. It's fun to see who was in old stuff who really hit it big.

Wizards came out in February 1977. Three months before Star Wars: A New Hope came out. Mark Hamill actually voiced one of the fairies in Wizards! I'm kind of geeking out a little bit.

11

Literally a plot point in Dresden Files. MC is a wizard who lives in Chicago doing private eye work. Regularly carries a blasting rod (wand) and a revolver. One big wizard gets taken out by a sniper rifle fired by a demon. He has semi-regular backup from non magical friends who are just well armed.

A regular human mafioso who is just so good at being a conniving and ruthless piece of shit that he can hold his own with the magic folk is a recurring character. Your spells don't mean too much if four goons get the drop on you with a metal pipe when you weren't prepared.

52

What makes dresden files so good is that dresden knows this, and he abuses the hell out of that. Time and time again he gets the jump of his enemies because he thinks outside of the box like that haha.
And same for marcone, he knows that with the right bullets and tools, common items can hurt the supernatural. Its also what imo makes the supernatural in the series so real, they are extremely powerful, should be feared but all of them have a weakness. You just need to know it. And like dresden said so much, knowledge is power!

29

I like the scene when he gets accosted by some low skill mages who give the line "prepare to defend yourself, wizard" and he just pulls out his gun.

15

I mean, the dude is just efficient. He shot the girl who was basically powerless (being the target host for a godlike being is not a power). Using the right tool for the job really.

12
Zootreply
reddthat.com

What in the fuck is that pokemon one though

7
lemmy.world

That’s pretty much the plot of Mashle

Everyone is a magician, except for Mashle who just hits stuff really fucking hard. And most wizards aren’t used to getting hit by a dude who can bench press a house.

35
boonhetreply
sopuli.xyz

Fuck it, I haven't watched any anime in like a decade and a half. Where can I stream or download this with English subtitles?

Edit: That website links to Crunchyroll which I hear is controversial, but it has the episodes, so I'mma watch it

2

Especially if there exist loads of versions of the joke that were made pre-AI. Who hasn't seen the gandalf with an AK-47 meme that was made 20 years ago?

9

You fool, I expected you to expect to prepare for war!

:: dies of gunshot ::

2

Something about the big bad in the first MHA movie whipping out a gun and shooting somebody just hit hard. Like this is a world where people can whip out black holes and use their skin to create anything they want, yet a pistol made everyone stop immediately and collectively shit themselves.

13
lemmy.world

The fictional world I’m building is at an interesting point. For decades, a few people have held most of the magical power and control, thus dominating entire battlefields. But firearms have just been refined to precision, meaning a good sniper can take down one of these mages in a surprise shot in one go. No sudden “spider sense” escape buttons.

8
Katana314reply
lemmy.world

Writing, or rather written, a book, but it’s hard to find interested literary agents. So, I’m working on a complicated plan to leverage an audience for self publishing.

I suppose I’m implying such an assassination is how the book opens, but it mostly just translates to a shift in the way warfare is conducted - fewer battle lines, more war of information.

1
stinkyreply
redlemmy.com

One of my school friends was close to Sarah Maas. I hung out with her a few times, and we played online games together for years. The secret to her success was her parents' money; they poured funding into her editing and publishing, and so she became a "self-made" literary success. I have mixed feelings about her.

I'd be curious about your work if you're willing to share an excerpt? Lemmy might be a suitable test audience if you're into it

1

This is really good

I like how we can see into the character's head. We get his senses (darkness and snowflakes from his vision, blood on his hands from touch) and his memories (the priest). It makes him very human (Klyskin?). I dig it

1

Yeah they are a hilarious group. The monotone dude who let's go went to clown school.

1

I really appreciate that there's one character in Demon Hunter that has a gun. It works, and is incredibly effective... against lower-level demons. The world-ending upper-rank variety need at least a decapitation, and half the time, a secondary decapitation or dismemberment of some kind. Simply asploding demon parts with one or two shotgun slugs is not enough in that case.

As a storytelling device, it really grounds the entire power-system in both the supernatural and super-human. We get periodically reminded that a gun absolutely holds its own in raw firepower, but the situation is just a bit more of a problem than it can handle.

4
slrpnk.net

My protagonist has the ability to wield a franction (a word for a small amount in my verse) of the vitael energies of potential offspring ("poffspring") they decide not to have, so like if they date someone of the opposite sex and things are going well and they're thinking of moving in together, and then they ghost them my protag gets the power of the potential unborn babies (well some of it). They have made enemies of pretty much everyone in their hammelit (small village in my world), but have grown that much stronger with each jilted partner.

Anyway, they pulled this with the shire riff's (reeve of a shire in my lore) daughter and got shot with a pepper shot blunderbuss and exiled from town, but they are able to carry approx a handful of extra sticks using the strength from their poffspring, which they use to heat the abandoned hut they live in upwind of the hammelit's middens.

3
Axolotlreply
feddit.it

Wait, but if they think to adopt a child but not do it then they get a power?

2
grrgylereply
slrpnk.net

I think so, yes, that feels right. OK, this is powerful... I think I've got the hook for my second book

2
Axolotlreply
feddit.it

Maybe you can do that they will get a "bad power" that is more a problem than something useful because the children had that power and so that would explain why no one ever wanted to adopt him

2

Ooo yeah like a curse and at first you think it's the children's fault, but then at the halfway point you find out they're the victims. Would also provide some good tension since it's the only way for the protag to get more power after the pepper shot removed their ability to make more poffspring.

I mean I was joking in my original comment, but you could tweak it a bit and maybe obscure some of the details to make the story halfway evocative.

2

I was thinking that this was a relatively bullshit example, but the movie "The One" featuring Jet Li makes this an awesome example. On it's face the impacts of one person likely aren't even enough for one person to notice, but if you had someone with the knowledge and means to take advantage of this they could be incredibly powerful.

2

At first I thought it's about political power.

Still tracks though.

2
midwest.social

why do americans think guns are so powerful? they act like people who haven't been nuked or genocided

-5
sh.itjust.works

“If you hold a gun and I hold a gun, we can talk about the law. If you hold a knife and I hold a knife, we can talk about rules. If you come empty-handed, and I come empty-handed, we can talk about reason. But if you hold a gun and I only have a knife, then the truth lies in your hand. If you have a gun and I have nothing, then what you hold in your hands isn’t just a weapon, it's my life."

29
lemmy.ca

The Rwanda genocide wasn't carried out with guns as the primary weapon. It was machetes and fire.

It's only very rarely one-on-one like a movie gunfight.

4
sh.itjust.works

Now imagine if someone came in there with a gun. That would change things. In which direction, I couldn't say.

10
treesquidreply
lemmy.world

Sometimes they did. It's not like nobody got shot in the Rwandan genocide. Lots of people did, and when it happened, it went like it almost always does, the people with guns killed a bunch of people with impunity unless the people they were shooting at also happened to have guns.

3

I'm hearing a lot of things that are true but I'm getting confused as to why they were said. Like what does the Rwandan genocide have to do with the post other than the almost unnerving lack of firearms involved? Ik you aren't the one who brought it up but just had to ask.

1
lemmy.world

The Rwanda genocide wasn’t carried out with guns as the primary weapon. It was machetes and fire.

It was volumes of people, primarily. An oppressed underclass poisoned with fascist ideology who overwhelmed they're wealthier tribal neighbors not unlike how the French ended up butchering their aristocracy at the end of the 18th century.

Had the Tutsis been more heavily armed, they might have given as well as they took.

1

The genocide ended with the victory of the rebels led by Kagame. They were mostly Tutsis.

The armed Tutsis did indeed hit back.

2
lemmy.ml

This is only true for exactly as long as the weapons are held, though. Unless you plan on holding someone at weapons -point for life, the power eventually reverts.

3

That's why weaponizing ideas is such an insidious practice. Give a man a gun he carries around in his mind and you have a never sleeping army.

3
lemmy.zip

I think it's the 'equalizer' aspect. A knight would have to train for years to be proficient in swordplay, horse riding, and usage of a lance. Longbowman had to train from childhood. A wizard has to study magic for years.

A peasant could pick up a gun and theoretically kill any of them.

Americans in general are also more familiar with guns than swords or bows, so the "effectiveness" is more intuitive for our minds.

12
midwest.social

that's what i think is so perplexing

modern war completely negates your individuality, i mean unless you count your individually starved ass, but uhhh the world won't

maybe if you're lucky your incineration shadow on a wall will become part of an artistic photograph

there's nothing to equalize but Americans think a glock and sunglasses mean something other than your suicide or a childhood gun accident

2

It absolutely does, cogs in the meat grinder.

That said, It brings everyone down to that level.

With guns, the mightiest general can still be killed by a lucky private. In most fantasy worlds, that would be near impossible for a basic untrained person to be a threat to a skilled warrior or mage.

And you are right, in the US there are an insane amount of gun deaths from murder, suicides, and accidents. Too many of us treat them like toys or emotional support Glocks, use them to be their masculinity.

1
lemmy.ca

Is this the same America where words controlled the people who controlled the guns on 6January?

1

Yes, but also that doesn't really mean anything in relation to what's being talked about. Americans have more exposure to firearms on average I'm sure the folks of Svalbard would have a similar thing going on, same with basically any country with mandatory enlistment. Whoopty fucken doo folks can be controlled with words this observation was first made in writing in the fucking early bronze age when mammoths were still extent.

2
Triashareply
lemmy.world

The Nazis built the gas chambers because shooting crowds of women and children was giving their low end grunts PTSD, even the hardcore SS. They needed something where you didn't have to watch them die.

2

Using guns to move people into the chambers was less traumatic than lining them against the wall and shooting them.

1

I'm afraid I have to ban you. Your original comment is hateful and toxic towards a particular group of people, millions of whom are innocent. My users deserve better than to be threatened and insulted by the likes of you.

You'll be left with this:

  • many Americans campaign for gun control, meaning we want fewer guns available
  • citizens of countries other than the USA think guns are powerful
  • wishing nuking or genocide on anyone is evil

there's so much wrong with your statement that I don't have time today to scrutinize it all. I wish you the best of luck in your personal growth journey. Goodbye.

Stinky of Redlemmy

0

Why do you think nukes and genocide are such a big deal? It's like you've never been hit by a gamma ray burst before smh

1