Spyke
midwest.social

I’m assuming that will also extend to people using hate speech against racial minorities or lgbtq+ folks? Or just white people?

36
lemmy.world

No, that isn't hate speech it's religious speech which must be protected at all costs. Christianity is under attack from the evil leftists, dontyaknow?

26

This one won't be the one that gets me, it'll be the ones expressing that CK getting capped was a massive net positive for humanity.

5

Just remember the definition. "Hate speech" is saying anything they don't like.

8

I saw the post from yesterday of Trump responding to this. But I figured I would post the initial exchange.

According to Pamela, Charlie Kirk's words should have made him a target.

Also, should we assume they will be targeting the swaths of right-wingers who called for retaliatory violence? Or literally any car with a Punisher sticker, or 2A messages of violence?

/s because I know they won't be

29
lemmy.world

It was ok when she targeted people before and everyone knew it but now that she has accidentally said it out loud she will face "criticism"?

Yet others are losing their jobs and having their lives upended just for saying something totally legal online.

11
Omegareply
lemmy.world

Losing their jobs for not reacting in the right way. Yet I haven't heard of a single person calling for "retaliatory" violence fired.

8

and they still haven't fired Kirk after he said that the president should be executed

2

You reached the end

Bondi faces criticism for saying DOJ will 'target' anyone who engages in 'hate speech' | Spyke