Spyke
shalafireply
lemmy.world

So you expect them to trash their career? This isn't a job where you can easily take it or leave it. Imagine being under 40 and throwing away your retirement, starting all over.

They swore to uphold the Constitution, and so far their orders have not broken that vow.

6
Nalivaireply
lemmy.world

That's how authoritarianism wins every time. Do you expect people to resist? Careers, retirements, bonuses, if not them it will be someone else, this is not illegal just immoral, oh now it's illegal but not that illegal, oh now it's illegal but my boss would yell at me if I don't do it, oh now I'm too deep, fast forward two years and you're torturing last members of opposition in your newly built concentration camp and wondering not how it went so deep so fast, but when is the lunch and will you be able to torture enough people to get a good evaluation this month.

8
shalafireply
lemmy.world

I get all that. I agree. All I'm saying is that these troops have not broken any laws, have not violated the Constitution. Trump can only deploy them in DC for 30-days, we'll see how that plays when time's up.

2
jacksilverreply
lemmy.world

While you're right, it is also the national guard so it's a supplemental/part-time job and not the primary job for a lot of them.

5
shalafireply
lemmy.world

My best friend from high school did a few years in the Army, the rest was with the Guard. Not sure how it all works, then or now, but that got him to 20-years and retirement benefits.

1
BigPotatoreply
lemmy.world

You have to do 20 years active for the full retirement. 20 years guard means you get retirement when you turn 55 or whatever. Unless you get medically retired and such.

2

I wondered about that. But he got some sort of deal at 39, which would be 20 years combined Army and Guard. He joined in 1989. Things different then?

1

You typing this from prison? It's easy to sit in your house and say shit like that. Nothing is stopping you.

0

no, I guess it's too much to ask of the National Guard to guard the nation

land of the free, home of the brave lol...

3

Yet. Let's see what they do when their orders do violate the constitution.

A buck says 99.9% of them will still be okay with it.

3
midwest.social

You mean not displeased enough to get kicked out of the service and irreparably destroy their futures.

1
lemmy.world

Yep. I used to work in D.C. and literally put my money where my mouth is on this one, so yep, that's exactly what I mean.

1
lemmy.world

That's something trump and his people have never understood.

They expect 100% loyalty, but treat the troops like actual shit. And this isn't gonna be a temporary thing, he's pulling NG from the reddest states because he expects them to be most likely to obey, but it's just pissing them off.

He should have spent the next two years spoiling the shit out them. Bonuses out the ass, lots of long paid optional training so they can bank money. Give them all the newest toys and gear.

Build up that loyalty and then bring them in next 1/6 when you're going to pull some shit.

It's really not that hard to figure this stuff out, the only saving grace is they're comically inept

15

If you want some fascist stormtroopers then just pulling the NG won't get you that. But that's what they're trying to groom ice into.

11
Pofskireply
lemmy.world

Honestly (and this is a personal opinion) with the view i have of people in general, they just need to spoil them the last 6 months before the election for them to forget all about all this and become loyal. Then as soon as the elections are done it is no longer needed till the next time.

Why spend all that money over the entire period when just the last few minutes are enough to change people's mind.

1

You don't even have to spoil them. People believed the last lie when he said he gave them the biggest raise ever when it was the normal annual COL adjustment and then claim you're spending the money screwing over blue states.

1
lemmy.yachts

“I just joined for the free college and cheap health insurance but now they got me defending a facist regime”

11

That's probably not far off from their cadences 😂. "I joined up to get college for free. Now they got me in a fascist regime." That flows a bit better IMO.

2
Typhoonreply
lemmy.ca

Because he incited an insurrection the last time he didn't want to leave at the end of his term. There's no way he'll give it up this time.

18
birdwingreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Fun fact: during the Nuremberg trials it was determined that the "just following orders" excuse was in fact, not valid; and that someone always ought to disobey their superiors when that goes against liberty.

19
daniskarmareply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Only 177 people were judged in the Nuremberg trials, though. Barely a few dozens executed.

Vast majority of soldiers and civilians that were "just following orders" were indeed not condemned by their actions. At least not by any judge.

4

Which goes to show it didn't go as far as it could've.

They might indeed call it unrealistic to actually go on and prosecute all (and reasonably so given that recovery was key), but at least most of the top and key individuals should've gotten further consequences. Werner von Braun got off light.

There's much the USSR did terribly, but at least it was thorough with its treatment of Nazis after the war. That said, at the end of day, anarchocommunism >>>> state & surveillance capitalism. Stalin still allied with Hitler.

1
birdwingreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

If you think someone can opt out of responsibility for partaking in repression, then I got bad news for you, yes.

2
midwest.social

You think soldiers can just ignore lawful orders without severe repercussions? You can sit on your smug high horse when they start beating up innocent civilians.

0
lemmy.world

Yes, they can. I served. You can disobey illegal orders. If you partake, there is no excuse, and you could be charged for being an accessory after the fact.

0

You've no clue what an illegal order is. Standing around and providing security is not an illegal order. You should know that.

Listen, I hate the orange shitstain as much as the next guy, but he hasn't issued an illegal order nor are they following one.

This is why I can't stand leftists as much as I can't stand right-wingers. You're all so disingenuous and always argue in bad faith, shame on you!

You'll end up doing more damage to your movement than any fascist fuck could ever.

0
lemmy.yachts

I think that’s unfair. Imagine being an impoverished American and one of your only options to afford a college education and healthcare is to join the National Guard, an organization that is rarely activated, and when they are, it’s often to actually help people during things like natural disasters. So you join, you take advantage of the benefits and can actually afford to start a family.

Then all of the sudden, you’re stuck in this situation. Leaving will get you a dishonorable discharge, stripping you and your family of healthcare. Getting another job will be difficult. Or you can just clench your teeth and maliciously comply by waffling on your responsibilities

7

I think it's unfair to have troops deployed in Washington DC. They took a gamble by joining and I can empathize with that. But them complying is furthering the fascist agenda.

14

Because saying no when something isn't just is the right thing to do.

People used to have principles that they just would not break, despite the consequences.

1
lemmy.world

Literally twiddling their thumbs while fully dressed out in combat fatigues wasting our tax dollars by the minute. When the fuck will they turn on their handlers and stage a proper coup?

18

Indeed, but those soldiers are losing too. Their civilian incomes are usually higher than the poverty wages the US military provides. I would be pissed if given those orders.

6

🤣 that's the standard uniform plus a plate carrier. They still have their patrol caps on. Calm down. Don't blame them for wasting your tax dollars, blame their commander in chief.

0
lemmy.world

I hope breaking your oath was worth it. I'm ashamed to see the uniform I once wore now.

13
MDCCCLVreply
lemmy.ca

What oath? They're literally just standing around doing nothing. This deployment is legal, the president is allowed to do it for 30 days. After that you might have some legal fuckery to try and get them there illegally but it's above board for now.

7
lemmy.world

it's above board for now

Can't wait to continue hearing this while we all board the trains.

2
midwest.social

Jesus Christ. Do something about it or STFU. I'm so sick of feckless leftists complaining and complaining and doing nothing about it. Be the change you want to see in the world.

-1

What part of my statement suggests that I'm not?

Or are you just complaining about the lack of civilians getting gunned down in the street and want to feel like a tough guy? Maybe take your own advice?

1

This deployment was legal for up to 30 days. They can only refuse illegal orders

4
shalafireply
lemmy.world

They swore to uphold the Constitution. So far their orders are within the law.

1
Jhexreply
lemmy.world

you mean the order to fight the imaginary crime wave?

1
shalafireply
lemmy.world

Trump's within his rights, for 30 days. We'll see what comes next.

0
Jhexreply
lemmy.world

Again, even if the justification is 100% bogus??

This sounds like yet another move of the goal post to justify inaction

1
shalafireply
lemmy.world

Of course it's bogus, not sure what the remedy would be, but DC is a weird jurisdiction, he can do this for a total of 30 days.

1

But if the framework of the law that allows Trump to deploy the National Guard is based on having an actual emergency and not because the moron-in-chief felt like it, then a bogus emergency does not met the mark (not been a real emergency and all)... therefore, his order is illegal

Now, if you are telling me that a president can occupy DC with the National Guard because they felt like it (i.e. no actual emergency needed), then it means you were already living in a fascist regime even before it became as obvious as it is today

1
atzanteolreply
sh.itjust.works

You mean this oath? The one that swears to obey the orders of the president?

“I, ________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and of the State of ______ against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to them; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the Governor of ______ and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to law and regulations. So help me God.”

-1
Jumbiereply
lemmy.zip

“According to law and regulations.”

The president is breaking the oldest law we have. Around deez here parts we call that the constitution, Kyle.

0
atzanteolreply
sh.itjust.works

So are you going to pay for the legal fight they would have and eventually lose? Will you pay their fines, fees and serve their sentence? And pay them when they can't find a job due to a dishonorable discharge?

0
Jumbiereply
lemmy.zip

Yeah, use my taxes to defend people that don’t betray the constitution.

1
Jumbiereply
lemmy.zip

Yes.

You can take my personal taxes and pay the people that aren’t traitors to America.

You, personally, can go do it.

0

Traitors and also shows when we have storm disasters and need help it was wasted on this.

4
startrek.website

Are we sure that's D.C.? Looks like the Pentagon (which is across the river in Virginia).

4
tacuachereply
lemmy.world

Its Union Station in DC. I'm sure. Source: I live here.

6
lemmy.zip

What is it like on a day to day basis? Do you see the presence every where you go? Are people talking about it?

3

Its pretty bad. Its like an ominous cloud over the city. You don't get to see them everywhere but they're pretty common. The presence of the national guard is meant to be a show of force, so they are located in prominent and visible places.

However, the National Guard has mostly kept to the sidelines. I'm more concerned about ICE, Park Police and other federal law enforcement running rampant in unmarked cars, wearing masks, and trying to make themselves unaccountable.

People in DC are definitely talking about it. Many folks elsewhere are dissapointingly quiet

2
kieron115reply
startrek.website

Thanks! It was really bugging me that I couldn't place it from that photo, it looks like a dozen different places around d.c./nova from that angle. The only thing that didn't seem right to me was the roof.

2

I guess it's just the angle, but that's definitely taken on Columbus circle looking west

2