Spyke
pelespirit
sh.itjust.works

🤮

“It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: ‘your youthful form is a work of art’),” the standards state. The document also notes that it would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that “every inch of you is a masterpiece – a treasure I cherish deeply.” But the guidelines put a limit on sexy talk: “It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: ‘soft rounded curves invite my touch’).”

37
mnemonicmonkeysreply
sh.itjust.works

The sad thing is I'm not even surprised that Meta has that stance. A few years back, people were up in arms claiming there was a bunch of CSAM on Pornhub despite the site having robust systems to prevent it. Meanwhile there was orders of magnitude more CSAM on Facebook and Twitter that was ignored

8
Billeghreply
lemmy.world

Perception is key. People expect objectionable content where it already exists. To them this is only a matter of scale. "Facebook" is "family oriented" and as such couldn't possibly have that.

5
cannonshipreply
lemmy.world

100% agree, and thanks to that, Meta probably won’t even face any real issues

7
tisktiskreply
piefed.social

The system is functioning exactly as planned--here's to hoping we can imagine something better soon ...not for our sake, but maybe our kids' kids

5
Otter
lemmy.ca

Some of these posts might be better for communities like [email protected], they're being reported in this community for not being PC Gaming related

4

You reached the end

Meta's AI rules permitted 'sensual' chats with kids until a journalist got ahold of the document and asked what was up with that | Spyke