Spyke
mildlyinfuriating·Mildly InfuriatingbyTarogar

This default wallpaper.

I recently noticed that the default background for Ubuntu 23.04 "Lunar Lobster" has a purple star missing and now that i noticed it, i can't unsee it. The one towards the bottom right is barely visible so that passes.

View original on feddit.de
lemmy.world

You think that's annoying, this is what the Ancient Greeks decided was a scorpion in the sky.

75

Edit: So apparently what i first wrote up can be summarized as "Asterisms are more relevant and sensible than constellations"..

::: spoiler original comment Especially nowadays with light pollution it's easy to tell which constellations make sense, the top ones in the northern sky IMO being: Cassiopeia, Ursa Major, Orion, Cygnus (really just the middle 4 stars), and Ursa Minor but mostly because that's got Polaris in it and it's the most important star.

Also fun anecdote: When i was a kid and didn't know any constellations other than orion, cassiopeia, and ursa major; i independently recognized the middle 4 stars of cygnus and called it the Pilot because it looks like the front view of a jet fighter, so how's THAT for being a sensible constellation! :::

4

Sure, but it’s still just some dudes playing join-the-dots in the sky. None of it means anything.

0

That's way more of a scorpion than some other constellations are their thing

23

I've heard that not having access to actual dark skies free of light pollution makes it a lot harder to see/understand how people could see figures in constellations, and that extremely faint light from other stars, nebulas, etc adds to the experience. Allegedly it makes Orion's belt easier to see. I've never had access to a sky dark enough to test it in person, though.

12

Uh that one is a rare case of constellation actually look like what it's supposed to be. It's pretty easy to see the scorpion tail imo. Doesn't have all the legs obviously but still close enough to consider it as one.

11
m-p{3}reply
lemmy.ca

It's actually really faint, but it's there.

16
lemmy.ca

If only there was some way to change it...

16

I do not have to suffer with such design flaw. I use Arch with the glitchy mess known as Hyprland.

12
Sharpreply
lemmy.world

debian 12 is so nice, been using it recently and i love it, just gotta find the time to convert my servers from ubuntu to debian when i get the chance

1
dukkreply
programming.dev

As OP stated, it’s still there, just barely visible. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

9

That's not great, at least it's not an LTS release though so it might not be an issue for too long once they come out with the distro upgrade.

Also I'm thankful the immune to this issue being on Pop which has very nice default wallpapers, though I don't actually use the default wallpapers.

3
ludreply
lemm.ee

Yes, they are.

There aren't literal lines in space of course, but the concept is absolutely real.

5

Also like, people tend to draw roughly the same lines, at least for asterisms.

I can't imagine many people, regardless of culture, would look at the northern cross or the big dipper and not draw almost exactly the same lines as everyone else.

2
woelkchenreply
lemmy.world

Wallpapers?

Most Ubuntu forks are about changing the wallpaper and other cosmetics.

-2
ludreply
lemm.ee

No, they are about the DE not being Gnome.

1
sndmnreply
lemmy.ca

Your post is mildly infuriating because it's sofa king shit.

1