Spyke
sh.itjust.works

Considering the image at least as uploaded here is 960x660 and assuming the top panel is about 1/4 the height that means each picture is about 768x330 or 253,440 pixels which is way less than the claimed differences. But if you convert it into bytes at 160kb it would be approximately 1,338,163 per side and if you convert it into raw 1s and 0s that gives a much more believable 4,282,122 bits meaning there's about 550,000 bits that are the same which I would think would be the real challenge of finding.

....and now I'm late for work

24

I think you could do it with a bitwise xor. Any pixel that is not zero should be different.

7

Each image is 480 x 480, I just put it in paint and trimmed accordingly. 230,400 pixels, so you were pretty close.

1
lemm.ee

I have a great trick for these. Basically you do the cross eye thing you do with magic eye stereogram images, and the differences just pop up.

12
lugalreply
sopuli.xyz

Most houses can't jump at all so I wouldn't be too sure about that

4
lugalreply
sopuli.xyz

I don't believe in mystical creatures like unicorns, giraffes and groundhogs!

2
lemmy.world

Start today!!! Today's a great day to tell all your friends and family absurd things with zero repercussions. (As long as you say the magic phrase at the end)

2

It's already past midnight where I live... and I live so close to the date line that it's Thursday already.

::: spoiler source

:::

1

There's dew on the grass on the pic to the right. There's not as much dew on the left.

4
sopuli.xyz

Comparing them pixel by pixel, I found a lot more 4M differences.

3

image comparison selected for all pixels different. Maybe even in a 4 bit palette.

4

Well, the sun in the right hand picture is coming from a different direction. It hasn't been raining in the left picture? I dunno, Jeez this is harder than one of those Capturs

3

One's the apex king of the jungle, the other is the king of the apex jumble.

2

You reached the end