Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemm.ee

14 replies

atro_city
fedia.io

Serious question: what does Russia have to run out of to lose the war besides people?

28
tjoareply
feddit.org

Yea if we would close the Baltic sea to block the shadow fleet of Russian oil tankers the war would be over quickly. The thing is if we do that we need to physically block them which would be considered a direct aggression. Russia would send war ships too and whoops, WW3.

13
Tar_Alcaranreply
sh.itjust.works

Wars end in negotiations, or when one side runs out of people or land, or when the population decides they'd rather fight someone else (like their leaders). Everything else is just either a means to get one of those, or make one of those more effective.

Tanks are a thing to make people better, money is a thing you use to buy people, defenses are a thing to make land better, etc etc.

10
atro_cityreply
fedia.io

Kinda doubt that matters. It would take a revolution not just some arbitrary number provided by the Kremlin to topple him.

7
Ex Nummisreply
lemmy.world

As long as they have warm bodies to throw at the problem, they'll use fucking bikes if they have to. Only solution is for UA to keep the grinder on at max setting.

16
Cyrus Draegurreply
lemm.ee

i'm sure they'll find some way to exploit cold bodies toward these purposes as well somehow.

10
Tar_Alcaranreply
sh.itjust.works

Or, they'll just use the ancient russia tactic of "nothing". As in "Here's nothing, go attack!"

3

You reached the end

Russia has depleted its tank stocks: the industry is not covering combat losses | Spyke