Spyke
anomnomreply
sh.itjust.works

The assholes are trying to retake Denali from the indigenous people after we finally gave it back.

3

Yeah, it was named Mount McKinley during that presidents candidacy, even though he never saw the mountain.

Then the during President Obama’s second term, they renamed it to the most popular/common name the indigenous peoples used, Denali

Now it’s already back to Mt. McKinkey, because Trump has a hard-on for both robber barons like McKinley, and undoing Obama’s work.

4
Optionalreply
lemmy.world

Pfft. Lousy historians and their stupid . . research.

26

Never heard of this goddess before but im glad i did. She's got some really awesome depictions!

66
IndiBronyreply
lemmy.world

Yep... She's got some great 'depictions' 👉😏👉

Always wanted a woman with a snake moustache!

23

When I lived in Panama City Beach a lot of people called it The Emerald Coast. I'm not the best with colors but if someone asked me the difference between Jade and Emerald I wouldn't know

3
lemm.ee

I like that we call it Denali nowadays instead of Mount McKinley. I'm all for this.

Now if I could just get South Dakota to issue me a new license plate without those faces carved into the mountain...

21

At this point, I don't know if America can heal with Mt Rushmore still there. I'm not saying we would blow it up, but I do think it might be good if it was blown up.

5
lemmy.ca

Like, just the most recent indigenous names, or from one of them before that? It seems arbitrary to fixate on just one civilization just to avoid fixating on exactly one other.

8

I've said for decades that in order to cope with an insane world, people take up unjustifiable positions. Some people turn to God, others believe in causes, or whatever.

Mine is that Wales isn't real and your language is a psyop. I'm sorry.

15
sopuli.xyz

Somebody teach me the basic pronounciation, so I can make a slightly less fool of myself when trying to say it, and I'm on board with that.

39
lemmy.world

I'm all for finding a middle ground, which is why I will call it the Gulf of Canada, USA, and Mexico. Or Gulf of C.U.M. for short.

36
lemmy.ca

I'll do this starting NOW, if someone will just post a pronunciation guide! Please?

27
sik0fewlreply
lemmy.ca

Best I can do is this: chal-chew-KLEE-kway

With some help from Forvo. The [t͡ɬ] sounds like KL to my Canadian ears and not TL (which doesn't happen at the start of syllable in English anyway).

Edit: apparently that's just rhe the deity... Not sure what to do with the last few letters. "eh-kattle"?

4

My gal spelt out “Chalchiuhtlicueyecati” but abbreviated “associated with.”

20
lemmy.world

Given how we found that out, I would think the god that would have domain over us would be a Japanese god

4

If we want to rename things (Mexico was a LOT larger in the olden times) why don't we call it "Gulf of the Americas?"

Oh because it doesn't support imperial single minded nationalism and isn't USA centered

14

America is a continent, not a country. "Americas" is as correct as "Europes". But certainly those who decided to call it gulf of america are not aware of that.

1
Salamanderreply
mander.xyz

EDIT: As indepndnt mentioned in a comment below, the OP was posted on February 14, which pre-dates the wikipedia edits. So, my conclusions below about the timeline are not valid.

Hah, sure, let's investigate 🕵️‍♂️

The term 'Chalchiuhtlicueyecatl' was added as a potential Aztec name to the English wikipedia page on February 15, 2025, by user 'Mxn'.

The description of the edit is the following:

Frum says the Aztecs had no specific name for the gulf, which is plausible in a practical sense, but Fernández gives a specific religious name and is more of a reliable source on this topic

If we investigate a bit further, we can see that the term Chalchiuhtlicueyecatl is described to be a name for the 'Gulf of Mexico' in the spanish Wikipedia: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chalchiuhtlicueyecatl

This page was updated to include the description of Chalchiuhtlicueyecatl as the 'Gulf of Mexico' in September 16, 2018. I don't have access to the citation so I don't know if the citation specifies if this term is still known/used.

If you check the history you will find that the same 'Mxn' fixed a typo in this page on February 15, 2025.

So, from this sequence of events it is highly likely that the term 'Chalchiuhtlicueyecatl' was included into the Gulf of Mexico wiki page as a result of the user Mxn performing an active search for Aztec names for the Gulf of Mexico, and finding this connection between the term an the gulf by searching on Wikipedia. This information did not come from recent news about the term being used by natives.

I can find no evidence of native people referring to the gulf of Mexico as 'Chalchiuhtlicueyecatl' more frequently or at all. I can find no mention of this becoming viral in Mexico.

I find it highly unlikely that:

  • User Mxn added an obscure Aztec term to the Wiki page two weeks ago

AND

  • This same obscure Aztec term coincidentally began being used by Mexican natives, and this trend became popular enough to be noticed by foreign media but not by Mexican media

More likely....

  • Mxn actively looked for a term and updated the English wiki
  • Someone read the English wiki, thought this would be a nice story, made the meme

And this concludes my little investigation 🧐

41
Salamanderreply
mander.xyz

Yes, but that version is in German. That website also has one in English: https://annas-archive.org/slow_download/24154814bfe1e676d79509c3db1f74a4/0/0

Let's see...

Woah, interesting. The author is José López Portillo. I thought he shared the name with a former Mexican president, but, nope, the author is a former Mexican president.

The title of the English version is a bit different, but the text appears to be the same. It is a novel, and I can find no mention of the gulf of Mexico or of Chalchiuhtlicueyecatl in this book. To me it looks like a mistake in the citation.

The claim appears to come from this text (citation 1): https://www.scribd.com/document/703207646/Dioses-prehispanicos-de-Mexico-mitos-y-deidades-del-panteon-Fernandez-Adela-1992-Mexico-D-F-Panorama-Editorial-9789683803061-cbee5

Unfortunately, that book does not contain references nor is it stated where this claim comes from.

19
indepndntreply
lemmy.world

The post in the screen shot is dated February 14, 2025 though?

4
Salamanderreply
mander.xyz

How did I miss that?!

My timeline is incorrect then. Since the post from sassymetischick.bsky predates the wiki edit, it is more likely that the wiki edit was made in response to this meme, and not the other way around. This pretty invalidates what I said above...

I still can't find any evidence of this being an actual trend, but I no longer have a good guess about the origin.

4

I think the difference in time is too big. Also, in the talk page's archive it is stated that the wikipedia was updated because of this meme, and not the other way around. This is from the talk page:

2

Where and when was this decided by the Indigenous people of North America?

I'm interested to learn more about this. I've never heard this name when I studied the history of North America,

7

No because it’s not a homogeneous people so it would have many different names/this wouldn’t be coordinated across NA

3

Not for the same reasons, but "also no, sorry. Still going with Gulf of Mexico."

I can meet you halfway and pronounce Mexico correctly, but that is beyond my abilities and I'm not ashamed to admit it lol.

1
lemmy.world

You are doing it the wong way. The wight way to do it is to acknowledge the victory of the colonizers. Take Denali for example.

-1
lemm.ee

I'm not up to speed on this I guess. I thought bringing back the name Denali was a good thing. Is there some more to the story that I'm missing?

6

This same order gets rid of Denali and puts back Mt McKinley.

Edit: I'm assuming from the negative voting that you were not the only one to not hear this part of the news.

1