Basically, every search engine has incorporated LLMs and are shoving them down your throat. If we are talking about tools that I would find useful I'd rather have a reverse image search.
Edit: damn, that down vote hurt. Must be an llm developer, I guess.
Edit: damn, that down vote hurt. Must be an llm developer, I guess.
If you are accusing me, I would like to clarify that, as of writing this, I have not downvoted your comment ^[1]^.
::: spoiler References
Type: Post. Title: "I could do more with native reverse image searches then I currently do with LLM AI.". Author: @[email protected]. Publisher: sh.itjust.works. Lemmy. Published: 2025-02-28T04:46:11Z. Accessed: 2025-02-28T06:14Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33553357/16973103.
The score of @[email protected]'s comment shows it to have 2 downvotes (confirming that it has indeed been downvoted by someone), yet the downvote icon is not highlighted. Given that this comment is posted from @[email protected]'s account (@Kalcifer is shown to be logged in in the top right), It would be highlighted if @Kalcifer had downvoted it.
:::
Basically, every search engine has incorporated LLMs and are shoving them down your throat. If we are talking about tools that I would find useful I’d rather have a reverse image search. […]
So, for clarity, are you saying that a reverse image search tool is more useful to you than AI integration, yet search engines are pushing for AI integration rather than reverse image search tools, and they may not have reverse image search tools at all?
I had no idea an llm could even accurately display sources. I guess I'll try again but as far as I know once they have their training material they are seldom retrained. Seldom as in not real time.
They're very useful, but just for certain things. The problem is that every corpo idiot out there thinks they're useful for everything, which they're most certainly not.
My use cases thus far have been pretty minimal. Stuff like OCR extraction of tables from images (which were possible before LLM's), very occasional reformatting of lists and stuff, some of the built in summarization features which provide tiny value. I've never actually used them to write something for me. The one time I considered it I found something better already written.
Could you elaborate? I don't understand what you mean.
Basically, every search engine has incorporated LLMs and are shoving them down your throat. If we are talking about tools that I would find useful I'd rather have a reverse image search.
Edit: damn, that down vote hurt. Must be an llm developer, I guess.
If you are accusing me, I would like to clarify that, as of writing this, I have not downvoted your comment ^[1]^.
::: spoiler References
No. Just in general. My comment was pretty non offensive and I was responding to a person asking for clarification.
So, for clarity, are you saying that a reverse image search tool is more useful to you than AI integration, yet search engines are pushing for AI integration rather than reverse image search tools, and they may not have reverse image search tools at all?
You got it, my dude.
You are comparing apples and oranges. That’s probably why.
What search engine do you use that has LLM integration but doesn't already have reverse image search?
I had no idea an llm could even accurately display sources. I guess I'll try again but as far as I know once they have their training material they are seldom retrained. Seldom as in not real time.
Why respond to a question if you’re just going to go off on a tangent without answering it?
I thought they were saying all llms have reverse image search integration.
Useful if you understand how they work and what they are good at
They're very useful, but just for certain things. The problem is that every corpo idiot out there thinks they're useful for everything, which they're most certainly not.
They're ok, just pretty limited in what they can do. Doesn't help i also have to fact check them.
My use cases thus far have been pretty minimal. Stuff like OCR extraction of tables from images (which were possible before LLM's), very occasional reformatting of lists and stuff, some of the built in summarization features which provide tiny value. I've never actually used them to write something for me. The one time I considered it I found something better already written.
Bings image search is still its most useful feature.
But at least you can use LLM AI for the simple price of checks notes environmental catastrophe