Spyke
lemm.ee

I’ve literally seen "but Ukraine has Nazis” before.

Edit. Thanks everyone. I don’t need an explanation. I’m just saying that if I cared to, I could pull those receipts.

76
lemmy.zip

It probably is true. I'm sure there is at least on Nazi in the entirety of Ukraine.

Does that justify invasion? No, not really

38

If you can identify them, it justifies flying over there to punch them in the face. I'm sure Indiana Jones can find some ancient relic there to justify the trip.

1
Hubireply
feddit.org

second-off Azov Brigade have confirmed neo-Nazis in their ranks

That goes for pretty much every single military in the world unfortunately. It's not really worth singling them out when there are Russians running around with black sun symbols and SS-Skulls at the same time.

Besides, Ukraine has done a huge amount of work to clear up these elements and pretty much none of the founding members of Azov remain in active service. The entire brigade has been almost fully replaced after Mariupol.

50
sh.itjust.works

The old issue with Azov had a lot to do with them receiving weapons and training from U.S. military prior to the full russian invasion in 2022. The backtracking and legitmization of the battalion in response is typically what people are most critical of. Seems silly how those optics used to be a concern.

2

I think a lot of people have no idea where the Azov group came from before the war.

2
db0reply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

So does Russia though. So does Israel and I'm pretty sure Hamas also has a ton of hardcore reactionaries. I never understood what that argument is meant to achieve except spread disinfo

37

Yet they're far from a majority. As long as the populace is sufficiently educated and the rule of law is observed, the Nazis should be largely kept at bay.

3
Geoblokereply
lemm.ee

Can't help but feel the creation of a hard right organisation is a natural out come of an invasion of your territory

12
lemmy.world

It's also akin to an invasion of the Bible belt in the US. There were nazis there, that doesn't mean they deserve to be invaded.

7

The best propaganda uses elements of truth or even wholly true premises. It’s the conclusion that’s wrong (“therefore we should X”).

6

Not a good example. "Defending X" is a much stronger requirement than just "pointing out that a specific argument against X is invalid"; the latter is done by everyone who likes seeing good arguments rather than bad arguments, and isn't a sign of liking X.

(The most pro-russian (as in, supporting the russian-ukraine war) stuff I've seen was various memes from lemmy.ml and lemmygrad that ended up in popular. I'm having trouble finding a better example than that; in particular, because Lemmy's search is bad and doesn't seem to allow for searching recent comments from a specific instance, and also refuses to give me more than a few pages of results.)

3
lemmy.ca

Classic sealion. No matter how much evidence you provide to one of them, they'll find any reason to invalidate or ignore it and continue prodding.

38

Their favorite words used to "debunk" anything you say;

Propaganda, conspiracy, projection.

Anything you say will be one of the three. And everything they say is the real truth.

It's like playing chess with a pigeon. They're just gonna shit on the board, fly away and say they won.

5
programming.dev

Have they been provided any evidence?

The only reply to that comment is someone saying they will give them a link tomorrow

2

No, because it's not worth the effort of doing so. Sealions like that person only seek to waste your time and aren't there for any actual discussion. You can provide as much evidence as you want, but they'll ignore or attack it and demand more.

4
sh.itjust.works

NATO is a defensive alliance. It poses no threat to anyone unless they attack a NATO country. It's like a porcupine, just leave it alone and everyone is happy.

Russia could probably join as WL well if they wanted. Ideally, all countries join, which would probably eliminate war entirely.

5

Fair. But it hopefully dramatically reduce it, though I worry terrorism would increase since that's the only realistic way to get a point across without official military force.

3
lemmy.ca

Pretty braindead position to take when Yog is posting pro-Russia propaganda memes straight to the front page of memes.ml on the regular.

30
lemm.ee

Ahhh, yogthos.... he's definitely my least favorite 6-figure earning IT dipshit living in Toronto.

I wonder why he won't move to russia?

12
Atomicreply
sh.itjust.works

Or so he claims.

The dude posts and comments like it's his full time job.

11
TheFririshreply
jlai.lu

Yeah gee I wonder why? I hear Russia is great these days!

5

It's not that his online persona is completely fake and he doesn't have the courage to fight the good fight or whatever else it may be.

Morally compromised inhalant abuser.

5
lemmy.world

Here ya go, Scruff. By the way, one of the admins there will refuse to answer if they are asked if they support Russia.

18

You’re all good! It was a longshot of a point to make. It’s a bit hard to land those.

6
lemmy.world

Yes, really because the claim is the totality of the instance is doing this (regardless of the truth).

6

to be honest it takes a bit of time just to find any mention of russia related topics at all (and then the first one is just a news article with zero comments)

1

These cretins can't have an honest discussion if their lives depended on it.

.ml is truly just a self help forum for inhalant abusers.

11

"Nothing changes in the middle east, they're both just equally genocidal candidates."

Meanwhile:
Trump: "I think we should just clear out Palestine, force all of them into Egypt and Jordan. Btw did you know those 2000 lbs bombs Israel bought were halted and just sitting in storage? I made sure those got sent out ASAP."

8
programming.dev

For a long while, i havent seen anyone defend Russia on lemmy.

Even if it exists and its easy to find if you have seen it before, that doesnt mean every single person knows about it

Seeing anti-NATO posts and thinking thats what people are referring to when they are saying there are pro-russian posts isnt that unlikely of a scenario

1
TheFririshreply
jlai.lu

With all due respect it's a .ml account that is 1 year and 4 months old as of writting.

Judging by their post history they spend most of their time in political and news on .world now from time to time you will 100% see someone defending Russia there.

just the instance they are on is riddled with tankies it would be highly unlikely.

The comment was made in bad faith or they have a serious case of selective vision. I would bet on the former.

10

This makes the chance that they havent seen any comment or post supporting Russia a lot less likely

But wouldnt it be easier to link to someone defending Russia and then judging by their reply than searching trough their post history?

3

All you have to do is browse .ml

You know you're at the right place when you start seeing stuff like "occupied korea".

I've seen plenty of people not only defending Russias invasion but justifying it as the right thing to do with claims that they are "de-nazifying" Ukraine.

5