Spyke
lemmy.world

Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? 'No!' says the man in Washington, 'It belongs to the poor.' 'No!' says the man in the Vatican, 'It belongs to God.' 'No!' says the man in Moscow, 'It belongs to everyone.' I rejected those answers; instead, I chose something different. I chose the impossible. I chose... Rapture, a city where the artist would not fear the censor, where the scientist would not be bound by petty morality, Where the great would not be constrained by the small! And with the sweat of your brow, Rapture can become your city as well.

223
fedia.io

“Unless that man is an actual laborer, haha, fuck those plebs”

76
lemmy.world

I'm having mixed feelings. Are we going here or not? On one hand no censoring... On the other hand... No censoring. Also doom, but there's also doom here too.

10
Eldritchreply
lemmy.world

Perhaps. But I think I may have figured out their logic....... no bears under water. So they won't have to worry about bear attack while drowning from lack of maintenance

32

Yeah, they wouldn't need to worry about bears, but I doubt the panic would allow them the time to contemplate the phrase, "No single drop thinks it's to blame for the flood" very much.

5

i doubt they'd have time to drown tbh, at depth a small leak is likely to cause immediate and sudden implosion, instantly crushing anyone inside. not sure how that would play out in a larger non-circular space though like rapture.

1
catloafreply
lemm.ee

Grafton, not Keene. Keene did have some free staters, but the cryptocurrency sovereign citizen pedophile kind.

11

Oh yeah! Grafton. Got those two mixed up lmao. They cut the towns taxes to zero and couldn't pay the garbage pickup. That brought the bears who proceeded to rule the town.

14
sh.itjust.works

Because of its narcotic effect at high pressure, nitrogen shouldn’t be breathed by humans at depths below about 60 meters. So, at 200 meters, the breathing mix in the habitat will be 2 percent oxygen and 98 percent helium. But because of its very high thermal conductivity, “we need to heat helium to 31–32 °C to get a normal 21–22 °C internal temperature environment,”

😮

100
DreamButtreply
lemmy.world

So everyone is gonna sound like mice when they get crushed under the weight of the ocean?

41
NaibofTabrreply
infosec.pub

Hmm... maybe not? The low density of helium at 1 atm is what causes the amplification of higher frequencies in the voicebox, but in a pressurized container the gas would be higher density so it might offset the effect... I think?

29

Love the horribly confused operator trying to fix problems with her equipment before putting the call through to the president.

6

Apparently when doing saturation diving like that you can't even understand what the other person says, between the helium and the pressure the voice is too distorted to be intelligible.

You can communicate with a computer that transforms your voice to be intelligible but it is really not a pleasant conversation so you can stay there for weeks without having a conversation except for the bare minimum.

5

What they mean is they will need to use the amount of energy that you would normally put into air to get it to 31° C, but the helium will only get to 21° C. At no point will the helium actually be 31° C.

19

If you're lookin for me,
You'd better check under the sea,
Cause that is where you'll find me,
Underneath the seaaaaaa lab,
Underneath the water,
Seaaaaa lab....

4

Will it be filled to the brim with billionaires so it can also malfunction and we are on time for the annual billionaire sacrifice to the sea gods?

59
MintyFreshreply
lemmy.world

Lol, that show is among the stupidest things I've ever loved.

25

It's not a toy. It makes real cupcakes... with a 40 watt bulb... and there's icing packets. But the secret ingredient is love... Damn it.

9

Sparks: … would you ever put your brain in a robot body?

Murphy: Why? I like my body. Ha, I love my body.

9
lemmy.world

Read headline, music immediately started in my head, "if you're looking for me..."

7
lemmy.world

Well, it's just scientists, so Sealab 2021.

Eventually, the techbros will make a cheaper version and add the pod to the end though.

43
Pup Birureply
aussie.zone

as long as they don’t use a logitech controller i’m sure it’ll be fine

12
lemmy.world

The logitech controller was fine, although it was questionable to be using a bluetooth one.

17
Saik0reply
lemmy.saik0.com

I now wonder if part of the reason that all happened is because the controller battery died, so they couldn't ascend.

0
pawb.social

Nah, the shell cracked, pretty much instant death. Dodgy tech works until it doesn't, only the first critical failure matters

6
Saik0reply
lemmy.saik0.com

Well duh? I've read the reports. I mean that maybe they went too deep because the controller died. Eg, dude holds button that tells controllers to go deeper. Controller dies... Sub just takes last input and keeps going deeper until it hits the catastrophic depth.

Guy was an idiot for sure, I just wonder if the controller played ANY role at all.

1

It seems unlikely... The vessel wasn't up to the challenge of anywhere near that depth, and they intended to go that deep from the get go.

I mean, it could be, but Bluetooth shouldn't work like that - it's a digital signal with a bunch of failure modes in the spec. You'd have to code it particularly stupidly to have that kind of problem - it's a very time-synched protocol, even a sudden disconnect with no disconnect signal is something a coder would have to confront explicitly if they were using off the shelf components

I'm not one to bet against bad code, but the decompression seemed to be pretty much instant and within the planned trip, it just seems like it doesn't survive oscams razor

1

The plan was to go to the Titanic, which is on the bottom of the sea. Controller malfunction or not, the hull was the issue.

1
lemmy.world

And in 2026, deep divers will be searching for datapads to find out what went wrong.

37

Add in "But harvesting it angered the psychic primordial shark that we worship as a god." And you've got the rough plot for the water planet from Kotor 1.

3

Maybe the pact holds longer in those silos 😆

5

Sure when in air. Not so much for underwater or really anywhere where they have to deal with a pressure differential, either positive or negative, where large flat sides are detrimental.

16

The hexagon is only stronger than a circle if you're gridding it.

EDIT (stronger for the TOTAL material used)

13

Nah if you only build a 2D structure, you won't have to worry about the water pressure because your structure will likely not be able to interact with 3D matter. It's genius engineering IMHO.

19
reddthat.com

If your looking for me
You better check under the sea
Cause that is where you'll find me
Underneath the
Sealab, Underneath the water
Sealab, At the bottom of the sea.

About 4 years late, but whatever.

31
Naraukoreply
lemmy.world

Why do I apparently have the entire theme song still in my brain meats? I only thought the show was ok during its original Adult Swim run, and it wasn't even a brain wormie theme. I apparently need to go back and watch it again to see what's up.

9
lemmy.world

I am probably a minority, but I think it's the funniest of the early Adult Swim originals.

6

Well I am going to put it to the test and see if it's available anywhere to binge watch. I remember it being perfectly fine and enjoyable, but never one I was intentionally waiting to watch. Time to find out if it holds up or even gets better with age.

2
lemmy.one

Very interesting to read, but sounds so astronomically expensive and reliant on zero mistakes in every single aspect of manufacturing every single thing going into the pods, that no one will sustain paying for this shit beyond angel investors.

31
lemmy.one

Yep I own a hardcover of it; fucking fantastic book, and excellent film adaptation.

11

Ooh. Dunno about the adaptation side of things. I will say that I read the damned thing all in one night. Had to stay home from classes after doing so. Good book, to say the least.

9
treadfulreply
lemmy.zip

Many people said the same things about the ISS, I'm sure.

3

Sure, but space habitats are far far more useful than underwater ones

There is definitively no shortage of challenges in orbit

9

high pressures are scary as shit.

apart from that, there's no sunlight down there. it's basically like living in antarctica.

27
lemmy.world

The episode where he tells Jonathan Brandis about condoms remains to this day the cringiest thing I have ever seen on a TV show. By far.

2
lemmy.world

If anything goes slightly wrong I die instantly you say? I need to sign up NOW

22

Yeah, wouldn't mind that for the next 4 years or so, possibly longer.

6
fedia.io

Space is hard to get to, no gravity, and there's radiation.

Underwater has high pressure, corrosion, and no natural lighting.

When you get an air leak in space, you find the hole and patch it. When you get a leak underwater, you don't have to worry about it at all because it takes care of things in microseconds.

20

Just like with space you can build in redundancies though. You don't have to be all Titan about it.

6
lemmy.world

Wasn't that mostly due to mismanagement rather than any technological hurdle?

2
lemmy.world

Kinda both. It was a useful experiment, but bacterial contamination doomed the thing from day one.

4

I've been playing lots of Oxygen not Included, so... Yeah good luck, what could go wrong?

15

I have an idea. Let's stick all of the world's billionaires into a submarine and see if lightning strikes twice.

15

This is for the oil and gas industry.

Ain't nobody paying for an underwater habitat for researchers when all researchers do at depth is take photos and samples, which can be done by an ROV.

Oil and Gas OTOH need deep see divers to do welding and other maintenance all the time.

14

Ocean is tough. Tougher than floating cities. Which are more realistic as real habitable environment.

I vote for Stanford torus stations in various L points.

Or, naturally, Mars.

Before that, of course, there are plenty of locations on Earth hard to live in, but not as hard as underwater domes. They should try that.

12
cyd
lemmy.world

The trouble with all these schemes is that it's totally contrary to poweful real world trends. The surface of the Earth has an overwhelming abundance of rural land that is incredibly hospitable to life. And these places are depopulating because people prefer living in cities. How are you gonna get people to move to the bottom of the sea, or Mars, if they don't even want to move to West Virginia?

11

The trouble with these commenters is that they don't read the articles. This one isn't at all about getting people to move underwater, it's very specifically about habitats for ocean researchers to live in, rather than spending enormous amounts of time decompressing after relatively short dives.

56

People don't really want to live in the cities they just want to live where they can get a job. Largely rural communities don't really have an overabundance of employment opportunities, tend to have crap internet, and most of the properties are already owned by rich people who want a second home, so house prices are completely insane.

11

West Virginia is the very opposite of barren, just poverty stricken. Nevada would be a better example.

1
lemm.ee

A friend of mine has just broken the record of 100 days living under water. He is aiming for 120 days.

8

i legit thought this was some wacky futurist article from 10 years ago that someone posted for fun

7

Ocean horizons 2.0 I hope.

Elon is probably the only superhero who could actually go there an show them all! Definitely not just any rich guy could do it.

7
lemmy.world

Why would anybody chose to live confined underwater?

Why would anyone choose to live confined in space? Idk, but the ISS still exists.

2
feddit.uk

If only they explained their reasoning somewhere... all these headlines are so inconsiderate.

13
feddit.uk

What part of the opening rationale was incomprehensible?

“With current diving at 150 to 200 meters, you can only get 10 minutes of work completed, followed by 6 hours of decompression. With our underwater habitats we’ll be able to do seven years’ worth of work in 30 days with shorter decompression time. More than 90 percent of the ocean’s biodiversity lives within 200 meters’ depth and at the shorelines, and we only know about 20 percent of it.”

9

Humans are the ones tooling and retooling these units for specific purposes, which can be done far more efficiently in situ in an underwater habitation. Along with any other human activities that will be occurring, such as immediate study in a dedicated lab facility.

6