Spyke
infosec.pub

And looks objectively terrible compared to basically ANY major motion picture released this year (perhaps just short of the great film but terribly-lit “Rob Peace”).

I was flabbergasted that such horrifically flat lighting and incredibly dismal/uninspired camera work didn’t trigger any reshoots (particularly with the $150 million budget they had and, as a consequence, the equipment they had at their disposal.)

16
demesisxreply
infosec.pub

They could have shot it on a potato and most people wouldn’t have noticed.

I’m probably not most people since I do this professionally.

17

fair enough, im not saying it doesnt look like shit, just that people who like wicked ate it right up. I didnt see it because I am straight

3
USSMojavereply
startrek.website

Maybe your theater didn't illuminate it correctly? I saw it twice, both IMAX and non-IMAX and it looked incredible both times

4

There are articles with the cinematographer about how they deliberately made everything grey.

3
lemmy.world

Anytime I hear anything about this movie I remember the hissy fit the lead actress made over the fan edit of the poster. “How dare they erase my face! Racism!”

13
lemm.ee

Grease (1978): $328 million

Wicked (2024): $634.3 million

Unadjusted for inflation, of course.

13

When talking about box office grosses, Hollywood never adjusts for inflation unless specified otherwise.

15
lemmy.zip

The amount of marketing for this movie makes me not want to watch it. Tbh I was never going to watch it in a theatre anyway. Would you guys recommend it to a non Disney fan? I've been watching all major 2024 releases digitally, so I was wondering.

3
lemmy.world

We have TONS of examples of "inexperienced, low-budget" male DPs shooting blockbusters. Sometimes they look great, sometimes they look terrible. Women deserve those opportunities too. That's how they become experienced.

2

interesting case you stumbled upon here 😭 they disappear from comments for ten months then return to exclusively trash on Alice Brooks, stating without evidence that she is a meritless recipient of DEI benefit. all their recent comments (that don’t get banned straight away) have no less than 8 immediate upvotes with their interlocutors often getting mirror downvote treatment—which just screams vote abuse to me*. very unique character here.

*this is speculation and i could be wrong

2

You reached the end