Spyke
sh.itjust.works

Not sure if they’re aware, but the Balmer Peak occurs at a fairly specific BAC/intoxication level, and output quality drops off significantly after that point.

6

I'm pretty certain it also depends on the type of alcohol being drunk. If you're sipping expensive whiskey you start to decide that 8 GB of RAM is a lot.

6

Funny thing is, I was thinking about writing my own text editor that is not a web application running in chromium, and wanted to name it "Blackjack".

1
technocritreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

And vodka too! Remember russians are whores and drunks!!! Amirite?!??!! lolollolloolo!! \s

-15
AbidanYrereply
lemmy.world

Olde Fortran Malt Liquor would be a better fit for my joke. It's ok that you didn't get it.

6

I don't know why you're trying to imply the "blackjack and hookers" Futurama joke that we see all the time in response to stories like this is some kind of xenophobic statement.

Trying that hard to be offended all the time must be exhausting.

2

Seems like a good fit for the Linux community really. They're not exactly known for being buttoned down.

1
fedia.io

North Korea did this already. I expect that Russia's effort will be as good if not better. Bonus comedy points if they use NK's effort as a starting point.

But I wouldn't try to use it if my Internet location was outside Russia. Or maybe even if it wasn't.

Also: something something falling out something something Windows.

43

In before you're going to need a telemetry spoofer in order not to attract attention. On the other hand, it takes an extraordinary amount of government paranoia before they start going after random citizens.

3
lemmy.fish

I imagine Russia will do far better because they are not completely isolated from the rest of the world like North Korea.

4

And they have a much more literate and especially tech literate population. And way more money than NK.

3
Echo Dotreply
feddit.uk

Somebody once was showing me a modified version of Windows XP and I'm sure it was a North Korean version. But I can't find it now.

0
lemmy.world

It will work just like every other Russian knock-off thing that gets made. Very shittily, and then end up in the bin.

Aren't they still also trying to make their own Steam? 🤣

41
ChicoSuavereply
lemmy.world

It will end up like every other Russian knock-off: made by the Chinese when Russia eventually gives up

20
lemmy.world

Nah, it goes WAY back to pre-WW2. Russia basically made copying everyone else's technology a major economic driver for them for decades, and it was all based around trying to sucker poorer countries into buying their awful products.

Cameras, radios, cars, weapons. Hell they even stole NASA Space Shuttle designs and tech to build their own, which just ended up in a junkyard.

10
catloafreply
lemm.ee

And the Buran system was more impressive than the shuttle, capable of completely automated flight!

4

I don't think it was ever confirmed. They only flew the thing once, which was confirmed. Anything else claiming superior tech I'd call USSR propaganda.

3

I'm not sure whether the orbital flight counts as test or operational, but that one. The prior test flights only had automated landings.

1
Echo Dotreply
feddit.uk

So they say but since it never even went into space it's a bold claim.

1
catloafreply
lemm.ee

I'm reading that it orbited at an altitude of up to 263 km, well above the Karman line. Is that not space?

3
Echo Dotreply
feddit.uk

Well that's debatable but really the point is it never did a re-entry so we really don't know how reusable it would have been.

1

If it didn't do a reentry, how did it get down from that altitude?

0

It's just like their foxbat claims...turned out it was a flying brick.

Edit: apparently I pissed off some tankies lol

It's well known that the foxbat was heavily exaggerated in its capabilities. It's how we ended up with the f15 and it's insane capabilities. Just like now russia fighting in Ukraine, paper tiger.

1

Of course everything's made by China anyway including all the high-end stuff. The exception being computer chips.

2

The fact that the Russian government came out this fast and said they need a version with their own commits is, perhaps, telling.

40
lemmy.world

Russian government officials trying to get away from windows, eh?

28
mEEGalreply
lemmy.world

нанана иiсе оие !

шнеяе уоця аddяеss ?

9

It depends what they want to do. They can fork and take on the burden of maintaining the whole tree in which case good luck with that, linux is too much of a fire hose to enable a 3rd party to assemble something similar making different choices about what they merge. Otherwise they can maintain a re-based fork that tracks the Torvalds tree and then congratulations you've just invented a feature tree that can do contribution with extra steps.

19

A special forking operation will be underway. The new kernel will be complete in just a few days, like the inva- er... denazification of Kyi- er.. Kiev.

E: lol, fuck off to the frontline and die for mother Ruzzia, tankies

16
lemmy.world

They're just jumping the newscycle for the propaganda machine. Russian government doesn't care about tech or linux unless it can help them deliver more bombs to Ukrainian babies and you don't need to fork the kernel for that.

12
Echo Dotreply
feddit.uk

Pretty much no military in the world cares about Linux because you want an OS system that millions of people are familiar with, require no additional onboarding process, and has decades worth of documentation and trouble fixers.

Microsoft have always produced stripped down locked down versions of Windows for them so there's really no reason for them to care about any of Microsoft's BS in the communal space.

-2
lemmy.one

An air-gapped FreeBSD os is significantly more stable and more secure than a commercially available os used globally. Security is more important to militaries than the fucking end user experience.

4
Echo Dotreply
feddit.uk

A gapped anything is going to be more secure than anything connected to the network. But if any I don't see what the operating system has to do with it.

Anyway that's not really what I'm talking about, the laptops that are given out to soldiers in the field are windows laptops not Linux.

2
lemmy.one

How do you know this? Apologies, but I'm not going to believe a rando internet person's comment and take it as fact at face value.

-1
Echo Dotreply
feddit.uk

How do I know that the soldiers get Windows laptops?

Because they do? They get Windows laptops. They don't get Linux laptops.

1

Piss poor dodge of answering the simple question.

If anyone is reading this thread, unless [email protected] provides some sort of evidence, don't believe what they say, ever.

1

Wouldn't openbsd absolutely take the cake then? Freaking OS is more secure than a vault

1
lemm.ee

I mean, they can just pull the current kernel, add a few patches and say it's their kernel.

Let's be honest, cold war brought the space race, if this war brings the "year of Linux" race I'm not going to complain

4
lemmy.world

шiтн веLот аиd vоdкд аиd ноокеяs

8

Astra (used in MIC) is outdated shit, RED OS (more commercial) is cooler and wine'd in a lot of our windows-oriented apps, but both would have a hard time without international community if threatened.

That's just some figureheads shitting with their mouths. There are millions of machines still running Windows with no way to change without a pushback from users and admins, and also some Linux machines that would only suffer if we branch out.

6

Go go, crablang nijigenerate redot MotherRussiaOS!!!

Special mention to all the hateforks created due to "valid concerns over code of conducts potentially banning white men from contribution" - a friend of mine had to clean up a state project that used such a hate fork that got terribly left behind.

2

Naw they Will just toss them in the gulag and force them to code.

8