You are correct but this is mtg so effect and affect both have a different check associated with them that can apply differently to weird shit like "copy" effects. Affect here means the affected player is being modified, effect means the spell is being modified.
A "spell effect" is a type of thing in mtg. Its saying the enchantment affects the spell itself not the effect of the spell. I can't think of an example where that would make a difference but if there is an MTG player will exploit it.
The closest thing I can think of is some copy spells append wording and if it appends multiple lines of text to another spell "effect" wouldn't stop it in certain situations that "affect" would.
Don't worry, it only has ≤5 lines of text because the card is cropped. The artist credit line at the bottom of every card would mean that it indeed does have >5 lines of text. You just know how to extrapolate from incomplete data!
Five lines? Try five words.
Fix this!
Fix this!
IMG broken
all hail the saucemaster
TL;DR
Spell: fix this. Result: this is fixed.
More than five doesn't work
But can they affect me?
Sure, they just can't make you walk in motion blur, but you'll be devastated.
Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick
Some not have way.
This would be majorly broken in Yu-Gi-Oh
It's only from spells and only the player itself is immune from them. I don't think this would even see play in YGO.
TL;DR and you've activated my trap card!
Former WotC guy here... I find this hilarious.
I'm pretty sure there's a simmer card to this in Red Dragon Inn
*affect
You are correct but this is mtg so effect and affect both have a different check associated with them that can apply differently to weird shit like "copy" effects. Affect here means the affected player is being modified, effect means the spell is being modified.
The card says a spell's effects can't affect you.
A "spell effect" is a type of thing in mtg. Its saying the enchantment affects the spell itself not the effect of the spell. I can't think of an example where that would make a difference but if there is an MTG player will exploit it.
The closest thing I can think of is some copy spells append wording and if it appends multiple lines of text to another spell "effect" wouldn't stop it in certain situations that "affect" would.
one.. two.. three.. four..
Yep. Sorry, that message doesn't affect me.
lol what if you rotate your phone?
Balls of steel
Blow it out your ass
I'm all outta gum.
He came here to play cards and smoke cigars, and he's on his last cigar.
Balls of steel.
Casting this would be a challenge. With no costs and no suspend keyword, you'd be basically required to cascade into it
Plus the verbiage is all wrong, it doesn't follow the template.
Cumulative upkeep {R}
You gain protection from wordy (Something is wordy if it has four or more lines of rules text.)
Maybe sideboard for Living End?
We need more cards like this
I'm pretty sure no card can conjure me into existence, no matter how many or few lines of text they have… :P
Effective ban of all of Kaldheim.
Do keywords count as a line? If not, Fynn is still in play
You have just beaten every single Alexander Clamilton deck
Duke Nukem for the win
Wouldn't that include this card
More than 5 lines of text?
I misread that
Don't worry, it only has ≤5 lines of text because the card is cropped. The artist credit line at the bottom of every card would mean that it indeed does have >5 lines of text. You just know how to extrapolate from incomplete data!
No in all regards. If you include name, type, and flavor text, this card is 5 lines, not more than 5.