Spyke
pawb.social

Huh. Lot of people Russian' to conclusions in this thread.

Sorry.

122
lemmy.world

Always is with Phoronix comments.

You find everything there from "Gnome is satanist" all the way up to pro-genocide crap.

I really don't know what it is about the site that brings out the craziest souch.

68
lemmy.world

For half a second there, I was like "yeah, so glad Lemmy is more rational than that site".

Few comments later, folks be talking about "Ukranian Nazis"...

41
lemmy.ml

are you a CIA bot or what? since when did people start ignoring facts and just repeat state department or fed propaganda? very strange.

-13

Hoo boy, you weren't kidding. I find it amazing how quickly this went from "the kernel team is enforcing sanctions" to an an unfriendly abstract debate about the definition of liberalism. I shouldn't, really, but I still am.

20

Hahaha I saw the parent commentor of that chain notorious for getting into back and forth arguments, sometimes reasonable sometimes not, and I thought to myself, this is going to be fun. Then I recognized the username of that other .ml user as a known troll and I was like, yep now this is going to go way off the rails.

11
lemmy.world

I would wager that every country has far-right elements, including Russia.

What Russia claims though is that the Ukrainian government is full of Nazis, which I don't think is true.

3
lemmy.ml

The wager isn't whether countries have "far-right elements". The wager is which country has a government that openly venerates a man who slaughtered Jews and Poles for sport. Maybe someday you will understand what happened here.

0

The absolute disregard of having any moderation is what does that. If there was any, there wouldn't be the cases like having someone be there by their third account, after the first two got banned.

Not to mention that controversy = angry people and trolls = more clicks = more ad revenue. I don't think Michael wants to miss out on it.

4

Yeah. Why is everyone saying this is removing their contribution credits? It's just a list of active maintainers...

45

That's a fair point. I rarely read comments on news articles, but morbid curiosity overpowered my self-preservation instinct.

12
JustMarkovreply
lemmy.ml

No, it's not like Israel is attacking its neighbors. It doesn't, does it?

39
bastionreply
feddit.nl

It's not about punishing Russia, is admit preventing vulnerability to a country that has an ongoing effort to compromise infosec.

Not at all saying Israel doesn't suck balls right now.

1

a country that has an ongoing effort to compromise infosec.

Any confirmation, that these specific maintainers were compromising something?

2
Dessalinesreply
lemmy.ml

I would never. The idea that any person should be disbarred from contributing to FOSS due to the actions of their government, is incredibly exclusionary. Linus is acting as much like a toddler as daddy USA is.

16

The funny thing is the Baltoids actually believe this will be good for Linux. They genuinely have no idea what they have done.

1
lemmy.world

As a finn, I understand that there are probably legal reasons for doing this.

I just wish they would be transparent and share those reasons with us. The Linux kernel is certainly not the only free software project that is impacted, if this comes straight from EU/US sanctions. Maintainers of other projects have a lot of interest in what is happening.

Transparency is also important because if EU/US policy/sanctions are causing issues for free software projects, then that discussion needs to be public, so that there is a chance to amend the policies if necessary.

65
sudoreply
programming.dev

The legal reasons was because the Linux Foundation is based in the USA and the targeted devs worked for companies explicitly sanctioned by the USA. Linus said he knew and trusted the devs he was forced to delist.

The Linux Foundation needs to relocate to some stable neutral country like Switzerland.

7
jol
discuss.tchncs.de

Linus has never been the best communicator, but he usually speaks the truth. But this is just bonkers and wrong. Not everyone living in Russia has "ties with Russia" other than "they were born there". If this is about sanctions, he could have still just told them that. But instead he just disrespected contributors completely and then double down in it by being xenophobic.

62
Jumutareply
sh.itjust.works

It's really disappointing seeing Russian contributors being disrespected like this, the regime that rules Russia wasn't entirely their fault, and allegiance, nationality, and ethnicity are all clearly different things

Also, wouldn't a state sponsored Russian hacker pretend to be from the US or something anyway? No way they'd contribute code as a Russian, that'd just increase others' suspicion

I agree with Linus a lot too but I strongly disagree here. I hope he's just being made to say this because of government policies

37

And the most dangerous part here is the whole rethoric of "if you disagree, you are a Russian shill".

34
Aulireply
lemmy.ca

At this point it’s the Russians peoples fault.

-6

Dumbasses like you are why the Ukrainian population is paying for your mistakes

-1
Gounreply
lemmy.ml

I don't understand how sanctions can impact free software, tbh, what's free about this? This leaves a weird taste, I have to admit.

24
Vilianreply
lemmy.ca

Linux foundation is a US company, and he's a EU citizen and there's companies that those devs where employed that are under sanction , hot that hard to understand

8

Yup. If you don't want to "mysteriously fall from a window," you do what they say.

I agree 100% with Linus here

8
lemmy.ml

???
We couped Ukraine in 2014 and their CIA, the SBU is committing acts of terrorism against Russia on at least a bi-weekly basis. Also, they've killed and continue to kill tens of thousands of civilians in the independent republics, for some reason.

The idea that Russia invaded Ukraine for no reason is absolutely brain dead

-30
lemmy.world

How's that Kool aid taste? You're not even worth debating, it's clear you're a lost cause. Keep believing this, and let the rage build inside you.

3

they’ve killed and continue to kill tens of thousands of civilians in the independent republics

Even if I assume the truth of that statement, do you not care about the deaths of Ukrainian civilians?

We couped Ukraine in 2014

My understanding is that Ukraine's parliament (Rada) removed Yanukovych from his position as president. That seems fair to me. Many countries, including the US, have legal processes for removing their leaders.

1

Reason: Russian bot

Reason: bot

The only bots here are the alt accounts downvoting coolusername.

-4
lemmy.world

Dude is Finnish, from his own mouth, it's just normal racism against an aggressive imperial, like how people hate the us

Edit: like how people from lemmy.ml hate Americans, if that wasn't clear

13
ouchreply
lemmy.world

finland has pretty bad, climate-change-exploitation-fucking-over-the-third-world dealings in my country

Which country is that, and what dealings?

9
ouchreply
lemmy.world

Can you find any links where one can read about this?

If Finland is wasting tax payer money to something shady, it should be brought to the local media.

5
0x4E4Freply
sh.itjust.works

1st world countries profiting on the backs of 3rd world ones is a completely unknown concept for you I guess.

-3
ouchreply
lemmy.world

Do you find asking for specifics offensive?

5

It's a well known facts, specifics are not necessary, I could list hundreds of other cases where I can prove that. I seriously doubt Finland would be an exception from that.

-3
Aulireply

Sure nice of Russia to look after only the breeding stock. Seems some things never change.

0
hitwrightreply
lemmy.world

I'm pretty sure not just the US wants Russia sanctioned to the oblivion. All of the Europe that borders Russia wants that. Now why would it be like that?

23

It makes no sense to discuss here.They probably follow Russia's narrative of Europe being a puppet of the US.

6
danreply
upvote.au

In the article, Linus explicitly said that it's not just a US thing:

And FYI for the actual innocent bystanders who aren't troll farm accounts - the "various compliance requirements" are not just a US thing.

11

That's more like his opinion or a post facto justification. Turns out it is a US thing.

If your company is on the U.S. OFAC SDN lists, subject to an OFAC sanctions program, or owned/controlled by a company on the list, our ability to collaborate with you will be subject to restrictions, and you cannot be in the MAINTAINERS file.

So to get back, you have to basically prove that you have no relations with OFAC SDN companies.

This update is from https://lwn.net/Articles/995186/

9
lemmy.dbzer0.com

We're gonna start seeing large open source communities start to break into smaller ones because of sanctions from now aren't we?

43
GHiLAreply
sh.itjust.works

You don't need sanctions. I've seen you petty fucks fork projects over a font.

79

They'll fight over fonts meanwhile WordPress is on fire and where are the forks?

6
Vilianreply
lemmy.ca

The bad precedent was starting a war

38
Alsephinareply
lemmy.ml

Yeah I'm sure the maintainers are in talks with Putin directly

23
lemmy.ml

If/when the Russian government comes knocking on their door and tells them that they need to do x, y, and z with the kernel

CIA could do that too.

16
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Any moderator want to actually let me know why my comment was removed, or...?

Is pointing out the dangers of working in an autocratic nation against the rules?

3
lemmy.zip

He's gonna ban american and "israeli" maintainers too then, I guess?

37
lemmy.ml

Everyone who disagrees with me is a paid russian troll of course. Nobody would oppose blacklisting people based on nothing but their nationality unless they were getting paid for it.

33
hitwrightreply
lemmy.world

I guess it's difficult to otherwise explain the position you have? It's not like people face criminal charges in Russia just for speaking against it. It's easy to see how the state would want to introduce backdoors to most western systems.

It's extremely sad that a lot of good Russians get swooped in this. But even abroad their lives are in danger to fight the state.

5
ghureply
lemmy.ml

I doubt if someone wants to introduce a backdoor, they would do that with a russian mailing address. People removed were open and transparent about their nationalities which means there is even less chance them being bad actors than some random guy pretending to be American.

23

Aren't the removed commiters with direct access to the kernel? It's not like it's some rando that makes pull requests.

14
lemmy.ml

I think you’re making up a world in your head. Who are these “lots” of “good” Russians who are abroad and whose lives are in realistically danger of state assassination? Not that it has never happened, but you’re blowing things out of proportion. Probably Russia does it at a scale roughly similar to the US.

-5
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

I think you’re making up a world in your head.

My friend, they poisoned people in the UK with a fucking nerve agent. They are so brazen and open about people being killed for not doing that the Kremlin tells them.

They have purposely made a meme out of the "suspiciously fell from window" thing, because they want people to know exactly what happens and why.

12
sudoreply
programming.dev

Nerve agents compared to drone strikes look humane and civilized.

-4

We're talking about poisoning a single person not a gas cloud. Poisoning a single person vs drone striking a wedding.

1
lemmy.ml

they poisoned people in the UK with a fucking nerve agent.

Yes, they did. How often is that happening? Proportion.

-6
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

We're not talking about taking out former spies in foreign, sovereign nations you dolt. I used that as an example to show just how brazen and open they are about this stuff. Using such a dangerous method, on foreign soil, is basically unheard of.

If you actually want to talk about frequency, we should be looking at the defenestration cases...

This shit is happening so frequently that there are several wiki pages dedicated to listing them:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspicious_deaths_of_notable_Russians_in_2022

Scroll down to "see also" for a long list of related articles about the Russian government assassinating citizens and low-level bureaucrats.

Assuming you actually give a shit

EDIT: apparently Lemmy markdown doesn't like the link. For anyone who can't figure out why it's not working, or for some weird reason thinks I would make up a wiki page with a title that specific:

Suspicious deaths of notable Russians in 2022–2024

And, again, after checking out the main article, take a look at the "see also" section.

7
lemmy.ml

Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name.

In any case, the defenestrations I’ve heard of have been within Russia, not outside it.

Using such a dangerous method, on foreign soil, is basically unheard of.

Not unheard of. US drone strikes on US citizens is a no-less dangerous a method.

-4

It's almost as if the markdown on Lemmy changed the text of the link so it's not valid.

And you couldn't take the 3 second to fix it, and then actually learn something.

Well done.

You also seem confused about what we are even talking about. We are referring to software developers WITHIN RUSSIA. So the risk of defenestration is very real. Again, to repeat myself, I only brought up Russia using chemical warfare on foreign soil as an example to show how open and brazen they are.

I edited the original comment with a fixed link if you actually care

2

Very nice link that not only does not have a list of names but also fairly explicitly explains that it is not talking about Americans killing Americans.

I am not going to spend more than 30 seconds on it but here is the first list of “lots” of Russians that are believed to have been assassinated by their own government.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspicious_deaths_of_notable_Russians_in_2022%E2%80%932024

Despite your personal attacks, the trivially discoverable facts are not on your side.

I used Wikipedia since you apparently find it credible.

My favourite “suicide” of a notable Russian in the last couple of years was the one that had a suicide note signed by “illegible signature” ( what it actually said ). I guess the FSB did not totally understand the instructions.

Indeed A LOT of falling out of windows. Quite a bit of poisoning as well. These are the successful ones. How about that time they poisoned the entire Ukrainian peace team including the owner of the Chelsea Football Club?

6
Vilianreply
lemmy.ca

That's true, as he said just use your brain, Russia is under sanctions he literally said that, so Russian troll is a actually very accuracy

-13
Aatubereply
kbin.melroy.org

why the fuck are we using that word here? just read the article yourself, "auteur de war" sans nees

6
lemmy.ml

sir this is a public fora, people speak as they wish?

As you know, they do not.

9
Aatubereply
kbin.melroy.org

Freeze peach doesn't mean you can call people "fag"s. By using that word you're 1. insulting those who express their gender as they wish 2. calling us names

Also, my point is that there is precedent for laws to geopolitcally restrict open source. I agree that there is a real security issue.

5
lemmy.ml

Man, I wish he'd leave the communication to someone else. He is so, so bad at it. And this isn't the first time

The way he attacks critics puts himself in a bad light. But much more importantly, I read this and am still unsure if he has administrative/legal reason, security reasons or political reasons...

If I'd work in Russian propaganda, I'd love this so much. Hope this will not cause disruption in the community.

27

It is inherently disruptive. And "knowing" Linus, if he apologizes for the communication, it won't come soon enough.

3
kattfiskreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Yes, the sanctions against Russia, as mentioned by Linus. The change also said the maintainers "can come back in the future if sufficient documentation is provided".

My guess is that the Linux Foundation must ensure that none of the people they work with are in any way associated with any organisation, person or activity on the sanctions list. And that they preemptively removed all maintainers that might risk violating the sanctions while they work with them to establish whether they might be covered by the sanctions or not.

Regardless of what you or they think of the sanctions, they are the law, and I don't think anyone wants the Linux Foundation to have to spend their money on lawyers and fines because they had a maintainer who also worked on a research project funded by a sanctioned entity. (If that is how it works, IANAL)

68

OK, that's the first reasonable explanation I've come across. I wish Greg Linus didn't reply in that kind of "angry" tone, because for some of us it's not that obvious.

12

Yes they do. See the long-standing debate over the ban to export crypto algorithms to Iran.

34
priapusreply
sh.itjust.works

As they said in the article, they are just listening to their lawyers. I would assume those lawyers are correct.

27

Lawyers will also usually advice the safer option. Even if your actions are legal, if its boarderline enough you have to defend your actions in court, its expensive and risky.

16

Lawyers will be honest or dishonest, just depending on what's best for the person who is paying them. Their jobs are dependent on getting good outcomes for their clients, so they can most definitely be trusted if you are the one paying them.

3

Lawyer slander is so fucking stupid. Would you not want a lawyer on your side if it was your ass on the line? A lawyer's job isn't to judge wrong or right. It's to convince a judge or jury of one's innocence. A lawyer has to defend the morally fucked the same as they do the innocent. You can't have one without the other.

I know this isn't a criminal proceeding or anything of the sort but I sense that's what the comment was referring to.

0

Yes, but this action sounds as effective against Russian espionage as burning any clothes that has red blue and white in them.

11
lemmy.ml

Nobody has stated any actual reason. Based on Linus' comments, Russophobia is the likely answer.

-54
IsoKieroreply
sopuli.xyz

Phobia, by definition, is uncontrollable, irrational, and lasting fear for something. In the current geopolitics situation I'd say that it's not uncontrollable and very much not irrational. Fear, as a fellow Finn, might be a bit strong word, but it's a definetly a concern.

When I first read that I thought that the response is a bit harsh, as Russian (and Soviet Union) individuals have traditionally been a big part of open source community and their achievements on computing are pretty significant, but when you dig a bit deeper on that, a majority of Soviet era things are actually built by Ukrainians in Kyiv (obviously Ukraine as a country wasn't a thing back then).

Also, based on my very limited sight on the matter, Russians are not banned from contributing, but this is more of an statement that anyone working for the government in Russia can't be a part of kernel development team. There's of course legal reasons for that, very much including the trade bans against Russia, but also the moral part of it, which Linus seems to take a stand on.

Personally I've seen individuals at Russia to do quite amazing feats with both hardware and software, but as none of us are in a void without any external infcluence nor affect, I think that, while harsh, the "sanctions" (for a lack of better word) aren't overshooting anything, but they're instead leveling the playing field. Any Joe Anynymous could write a code which compromises the kernel as a whole, but should that Joe live in Russia, it might bring a government backed team which can hide their tracks on a quite a bit different level with their resources than any individual could ever even dream about.

So, while that decision might slow down some implementations and it might include some of the most capable of developers, the fear that one of them might corrupt the whole project isn't unreasonable and, with ongoing sanctions in place (and legal requirements that follow) the core dev team might not even have a choice on this.

In current global environment we're living in, I'd rather have a bit too careful management than one which doesn't take things seriously enough. We already have Canonical and others to break stuff way too often, we don't need malicious government to expand on that with nefarious purposes which could compromise a shit on of stuff on a very fundamental level if left unattended.

27

Fear, as a fellow Finn, might be a bit strong word, but it’s a definetly a concern.

I mean, if my country suffered through the Winter War, I'd consider that a very rational fear.

I'm sure Jews are pretty nervous around German hyper-nationalists too.

14
lemmy.ml

Phobia, by definition, is uncontrollable, irrational, and lasting fear for something. In the current geopolitics situation I'd say that it's not uncontrollable and very much not irrational.

Russophobia is the fear or hatred of Russia or people from Russia. Etymology is not semantics, as anyone should already know.

When I first read that I thought that the response is a bit harsh, as Russian (and Soviet Union) individuals have traditionally been a big part of open source community and their achievements on computing are pretty significant, but when you dig a bit deeper on that, a majority of Soviet era things are actually built by Ukrainians in Kyiv (obviously Ukraine as a country wasn't a thing back then).

This is simply false. Soviet contributions spanned a large array of ethnicitied and nationalities and Ukraine was a minority in their regard, as were all ethnicities and nationalities.

Though I don't see why your point would matter. Is Russophobia only bad if Russians have made enough contributions to your field of interest?

Also, based on my very limited sight on the matter, Russians are not banned from contributing, but this is more of an statement that anyone working for the government in Russia can't be a part of kernel development team.

To my knowledge, nothing at all has been said about working for the Russian government or: this issue. It I'd a blanket exclusion of all Russians from the maintainer list.

Personally I've seen individuals at Russia to do quite amazing feats with both hardware and software, but as none of us are in a void without any external infcluence nor affect, I think that, while harsh, the "sanctions" (for a lack of better word) aren't overshooting anything, but they're instead leveling the playing field.

Presumably you support much harsher sanctions against all Americans, Brits, Germans, French, and Israelis, then. Are you any of these things? Perhaps you should start advocating for sanctions on yourself.

Any Joe Anynymous could write a code which compromises the kernel as a whole, but should that Joe live in Russia, it might bring a government backed team which can hide their tracks on a quite a bit different level with their resources than any individual could ever even dream about.

That is in no way unique to Russia and we already have plenty of examples of US, Israeli, and other Western countries compromising systems and software. Do just a little bit of critical thinking.

-18
lemmy.world

Russophobia is the fear or hatred of Russia or people from Russia.

Ok, seems logical so far.

Linus is Finnish, maybe this is also a lesson: "Don't brutalize random neighboring countries because in the future they might be in a position to fuck you in the ass."?

I mean, the Winter War is kind of not a fond memory for them, though everybody loves some Sima Häyhä, one of the most righteous men of the 20th century.

9
lemmy.ml

Linus is Finnish, maybe this is also a lesson: "Don't brutalize random neighboring countries because in the future they might be in a position to fuck you in the ass."?

I will dispute your framing, but why does it justify collective punishment and hatred if all people from a country?

I mean, the Winter War is kind of not a fond memory for them, though everybody loves some Sima Häyhä, one of the most righteous men of the 20th century.

At the time of the Winter War, Finland had existed for about 20 years, same as the USSR. Both emerged out of the Russian Empire. The USSR sought land and space for military defense against its Northern flank near St Petersburg, which was vulnerable, as well as, ideally, ports to seal from water invasions. Finland rejected every attempt at land exchanges, which was of course their right, but the USSR also, correctly, predicted that Finland would facilitate the Nazi advance and that this land was necessary to repel their war. Faced with an existential threat, they invaded Finland and took much of the land they needed and the war unfolded there exactly as predicted, with Finland rapidly becoming Nazi collaborators and putting down most of its internal resistance. The Continuation War followed, of course. To this day, they teach false histories about this, via the usual government censorship and creation of school curricula.

Sima Häyhä was hated by many early on and received many personal death threats to his face. His rehabilitation in pop culture is more of a thing from the 70d and 80s. Finland collaborated with Nazis and built death camps and was subsequently liberated by the USSR. With fascist groups disbanded and banned and the USSR elevated to the status of primary protagonist of winning the war against the Nazis,, those who had supported the previous fascist-friendly/just plain fascist government became pretty unpopular for some time.

-12
hitwrightreply
lemmy.world

This country attacked me. Should I allow their enemies to reach them through my territory? Sure.

"USSR correctly predicted this!"

The timeline is fuwky wucky in your argument mate

-4

Ah yes, the famed "reluctant" Nazi collaborators that just had to help Nazis and build death camps to get revenge on the Russkies.

I wonder why all of these liberals here keep making excuses for Nazis and Nazi collaborators.

0
pelyareply
lemmy.world

The security issue is very likely scenario. If you're in Russia, you can go to jail at any moment on totally bogus charges. It is very easy for FSB to pressure some random kernel maintainer into adding hard to detect backdoor into their code, it will be XZ situation all over again.

31
lemmy.ml

Liberals love collective punishment and have been in a Russophobic bender for decades, with an uptick in recent years. They hate all Russians and repeat racist rhetoric from Ukrainian Nazis.

-54
lemmy.ml

Liberalism is primarily an international term. You are very confused if you think it is just about US "left" politics.

And I said that there are Ukrainian Nazis whose racism is repeated by liberals. This is a simple fact.

-21

Because liberals repeated and repeat the talking points of Ukrainian Nazis.

You seem to be under the midapprheen that they either didn't exist or went away. That would be incorrect.

-13
lemmy.world

I'm well aware that liberal is an international term.

However, it is used very differently in the US to everywhere else. In the US, liberal is used to pretty much mean "left wing" or "relating to the Democrat party".

People in the US wouldn't describe an expansion in gun rights as something the libs would want, for example.

Nor would people in the US agree that liberal people want more freedoms for businesses.

But those are parts of liberal ideology elsewhere.

And I said fuck off with your Ukraine Nazi bullshit. Stop parroting Russian propaganda, gimboid.

-5

When he says "Liberals love collective punishment..." he is not saying left wing, he is saying loudly right wing.

4

I'm well aware that liberalism is an international term.

Yet you assumed I made a US-specific reference when I did in no way do so.

However, it is used very differently in the US to everywhere else. In the US, liberal is used to pretty much mean "left wing" or "relating to the Democrat party".

Yes I know. I was not using it in that sense.

And I said fuck off with your Ukraine Nazi bullshit. Stop parroting Russian propaganda, gimboid.

It is not bullshit. There are and have been Ukrainian Mazis and liberals falling over themselves to repeat their racist and chauvinist talking points.

-1
lemmy.world

I mean, I hate most Russians, but only since they invaded Ukraine.

Russia whines endlessly about ancient wrongs against them, the Finns have a lot to remember about Russia too.

5
lemmy.ml

Presumably you also hate most Americans and Israelis, then.

Personally, I only hate those who take an active role in a major injustice and am merely frustrated with those who are passive, and I do so consistently across nationalities.

-5

I think Palestinians have a right to be angry at Israelis, even to the point of potential violence.

And yet, by and large, Palestinians, facing genocide, focus their fights on soldiers and military equipment while showing empathy towards those Israelis who aren't actively expressing racism towards them.

But yes Palestinians do have every right to resist occupation and genocide through violence.

But this was not my question. It is whether you consiste tky believe in and apply the rhetoric you are using or whether you are, note likely, swept up in the current hate-on towards all Russians.

Much in the same way I think Russians have long passed a historical threshold for which we should consider whether they are compatible with civilized society.

This reads as very racist and draws on orientalist tropes. I assume you picked them up from the upsurge in fascistic rhetoric, including from Ukrainian Nazis whose rhetoric has been amplified and anonymized/filtered through mainstream repetitiom, and have not discovered this talking point de novo.

We gave them a shot after the USSR fell, they didn't take the opportunity to clean up their act.

tf are you talking about. The fall of the USSR came with a mass expropriation if wealth and industry and social programs at the expense of tens of millions of lives. Attempts to join the imperial core were rebuffed, it was placed in permanent shock therapy territory and systematically excluded. They did exactly what Western interests wanted them to do. This is the Russia your ideology created.

So now we're going back to it, confrontation.

There was never a pause in imperialist escalation.

Only this time we're not 2-3x stronger than them, we're 10-20x. I like those odds.

I see that rather than ask yourself whether you consistently apply your logic, you are here just revealing that you are a nationalist that truly does not care and is now excited for a world war.

-1
lemmy.world

I didn't think that being murdered by Putin's thugs is specifically Homophobic, but do let us know in the comments.

Like and Subscribe.

4

It seems pretty clear that the negative implication is putin's regime abusing his authority for sexual favors (especially given all the mass rapes by russian forces in ukraine...) and not that said favors are bad because theyre gay. It's telling that they assumed it was based in homophobia, though.

5
AbidanYrereply
lemmy.world

Hmm yes, we all remember when noted liberal Mitt Romney said Russia was the biggest geopolitical threat facing the US.

3
lemmy.ml

Reporter: [REDACTED]
Reason: Ukranians aren't nazis

The ones that are, are.

Reporter: [REDACTED]
Reason: Misinformation, hate speech against UA

Only love speech for Banderites, please.

0
faltrykareply
lemmy.world

All it takes is reading the article to see why it was done. You clearly did not do that and instead inserted your own agenda.

11
lemmy.ml

I did read the article and drew the conclusion I just stated. Feel free to offer your own take.

-9
faltrykareply
lemmy.world

While he certainly wasn’t sensitive about how he said it, he did state is was sanctions related.

7
lemmy.ml

He was not clear on that at all. For all we know it could be an excuse among the several vague ones he gave or a reference to pressure from Feds.

-11
faltrykareply
lemmy.world

And FYI for the actual innocent bystanders who aren't troll farm accounts - the "various compliance requirements" are not just a US thing.

If you haven't heard of Russian sanctions yet, you should try to read the news some day. And by "news", I don't mean Russian state-sponsored spam.

8

The "various comoliance requirements" are unstated. Everything here is being left to a vague implication.

-5
lemmy.ml

For what reason do all Russians deserve to be punished and excluded as pariahs?

-1
lemmy.ml

Of course it is. It is punishing all members of a nationality for the actions if their government.

5
Bookmeatreply
lemmy.world

I didn't realize all Russians were in the Linux kernel maintainers file. Silly me.

-1

A trivial bad faith reading. Think about it for a few seconds more: what qualified their removal?

3
lemmy.ml

Of course you are. This thread is about people getting kicked off the maintainer list for simply being Russian and y'all are bleating "good, fuck Russia".

9
lemmy.world

Yes. I am saying that the Russian people who were maintaining anything in the Linux kernel commits have a very real threat of not only being compromised to do ill, but also have their identity on the commit chain being taken over by state actors.

What in the hell are you arguing for here?

-4

lmao what a load of crap.

But anyways thanks for contradicting yourself.

1
lemmy.ml

Nearly all citizens are obedient to their countries. Why single out Russians?

-3

Before you do america too

Yes this is the obvious cognitive dissonance that arises from my question. The US has invaded and bombed countries, couped countries, plunged millions into poverty and death, consistently for decades. Buy I don't see any if you saying, "Fuck America" and trying to kick all Americans out of your spaces.

The US is backing Israel's genocide to the hilt righy now. It would not happen without American support that Israel depends on. And most European countries are backseat supporters if that agenda. Where is your bleating for villification of every person from all those countries?

Decent part of america was not larping the war either.

Which war? There have been so many US-bscked wars in recent years that I have no idea which one you would be referring to.

But I am confused about the qualifier. Who had said anything about larping? This is collective punishment and chauvinism against all Russians.

It is shameful what we did in middle east for israels benefit.

Can I get a "Fuck America"?

Hopefully never again but who are we kidding...

Not just never again, it is happening right now, under Dems, with support of their candidates that is part of the admin doing genocide. Every pro-Harris post on this site is a tacit endorsement. Should we ban them?

-2
lemmy.world

Because Russia has invaded another country and is currently committing a genocide. Christ 🤦‍♀️

3

Russia is not committing a genocide. However, the US and Israel are have been invading Lebanon and Syria.

Do you support removing all Americans from the maintainer lost? Can I get a "Fuck America"?

-8
Lysergidreply
lemmy.ml

He just applied Russians’ favorite soviet era saying “those who is not with us is against us”

-2

Who did that? And that is a cartoonish an embarrassing thing for you to say I'd a soviet saying, let alone a popular one.

-5
programming.dev

I'd really like to see the criteria for delisting people, though. As Russia is not the only one waging wars, there are worse countries out there. I guess it all boils down to Linus being from Finland.

22

Yeah the kernel might end up being forked if this shit keeps going. Sanctions affecting open source software like this was not something I expected...

23

There may be worse countries, but rest of the word is not in a proxy war with them.

8
lemmy.world

An update:

If your company is on the U.S. OFAC SDN lists, subject to an OFAC sanctions program, or owned/controlled by a company on the list, our ability to collaborate with you will be subject to restrictions, and you cannot be in the MAINTAINERS file.

(direct link)

3
Mihiesreply
programming.dev

That sounds like an advice, not something official? Also why is an open source project affected by US sanctions? It's not an US open source project, or is it?

2
lemmy.world

Linux Foundation (of which Linus is an employee) is an US entity. RISC-V International foresaw this and chose to incorporate in Switzerland.

4
Mihiesreply
programming.dev

But does it mean they own Linux? They list (support I guess) a lot of projects, including RISC-V. BTW smart move from RISC-V

1

The Linux kernel (the code) is open-source. Linux Foundation (the people who write said code) is headquartered in the US. The US can decide what Linux Foundation can and cannot do, who works there, etc. They can't control who uses the code.

1

He alludes to sanctions being a factor but never clarifies on advice from his lawyers. ngl I don't like the look of it just from a transparency perspective.

17

I was expecting an adequate response, but this... I'll just say I'm very disappointed.

17
sh.itjust.works

Maybe they can contribute to RedStar instead. Is best os for great compute.

11
Fareshreply
lemmy.ml

Linux is the kernel, not the OS. RedStar uses Linux as the kernel.

4

I understand, thank you. My statement kind of assumes north korea is maintaining a fork of the kernel they patch and customize. It also implies NK is one of the few organizations that would accept russian contributions into their fork, given the somewhat limited number of linux projects operating outside of the sanctions.

4

One of the worst news I've read lately.

Why aren't Israeli maintainers removed? Oh because linux is basically owned by IBM now.

The linux kernel isn't free anymore. It's open source, but not free.

6
feddit.org

Hm i never coded a line in my life, but i always wondered so honest question to the experts here: is it realistic that someone codes security back doors so hidden in other bad or wrong documented code, that nobody recognizes it in OSS community? I mean code is getting more complicated and specialized, dont you need more and more human resources (more than one person and hopefully not all with a bad intention) to check over that code? If im correct you shouldnt let more code into your software than the community is able to check an validate several times... Doesnt mean it has to be russians that need to be excluded idk

3

Yes, not only is it realistic, it has actually happened. It's easier to write code than understand it. Even when reviewing code, you miss more or less obvious issues. Not to mention intentional vulnerabilities that can be sneaked in over multiple commits and time span long enough to make reviewers forget the larger context.

20

There will be a million security issues across all OSS. Some of it will be intentional; if so definitely don’t expect it to be a “findable” back door. It will be a set of vulnerabilities across several projects, that when combined allow the perpetrators privilege-escalations or a known path through a security system. Removing “Russians” from contribution doesn’t actually stop that, everyone can use a VPN and work as an American or whatever, but it does send a signal.

6

This might not be super useful if you don't write code but I always found the contest submissions fun to read and try to figure out for the https://www.underhanded-c.org/ contest.

They break down and explain the runner up and finalist for each year and how the attack works. It's usually something very subtle that most people wouldn't catch.

3
lemmy.zip

I understand where this comes from, he is finnish but this is pretty unprofessional.

-1
lemmy.ml

"Have we become so fearful? Have we become so cowardly That we must extinguish a man because he carries the blood of a current enemy?"

  • Picard, Star Trek TNG
-5
gnuhautreply
lemmy.ml

How does this prevent the Russians from accessing sensitive technology? Oh it doesn't! It just excludes them from contributing to Linux, not from using it.

Accusing others from "arguing in bad faith" are we?

1

Lemmy was built by communists. you would be better served by going back to Reddit.

9
lemmy.ml

Scratched liberals abound. It takes very liyyl3 for them to be racist and chauvinist.

-43
lemmy.ml

It means supporters of the dominant ideology if capitalism, just like it has always meant.

-15
lemmy.world

Not at all true. If you're referencing US ideologies of Capitalism, holy shit are you wrong and read the wrong Wikipedia.

In fact, the Democrats since the 60's have run campaigns WAY against the threat of late-stage Capitalism. Republicans are the pro-capitalist party in the sense they want to privatize everything and help their friends, and also "deregulate" anything and everything.

These are anti-capitalist ideas.

Come on back with some more Wiki links, good buddy.

8

In fact, the Democrats since the 60's have run campaigns WAY against the threat of late-stage Capitalism.

Bruh what world are you living in lmao. Obama reached to bankers uncaringly tanking the global economy by giving them money to do with as they wished (and, as always, they wished to give themselves a bonus).

7
Aatubereply
kbin.melroy.org

Dubliette is referring to the thought-terminating cliché that every major US party doesn't want to abolish capitalism (the economic system centered around capital, private ownership, etc.), ergo we're all liberals.

3

A thought-terminating cliché (also known as a semantic stop-sign, a thought-stopper, bumper sticker logic, or cliché thinking) is a form of loaded language, often passing as folk wisdom, intended to end an argument and quell cognitive dissonance.[1][2] Its function is to stop an argument from proceeding further, ending the debate with a cliché rather than a point. Some such clichés are not inherently terminating. They only become so when used to intentionally dismiss dissent or justify fallacious logic.[3]

4

Not at all true. If you're referencing US ideologies of Capitalism, holy shit are you wrong and read the wrong Wikipedia.

I am quite correct, though I am referring to liberalism in the general internationa sense. This is what liberalism always has been. You must understand it as what it is and has done, not what it tells you it is meant to be. As Stafford Beer said, it makes no sense to think that the purpose of something is what it consistently fails to do. The liberalism of the enlightenment had in its right hand brutal, racist colonial exploitation and in its left a ruthless industrial revolution chaining the people to factories and removing them from all commond and property. It is a product of capitalism itself.

In fact, the Democrats since the 60's have run campaigns WAY against the threat of late-stage Capitalism.

The Democrats are a capitalist party and always have been. They do not work against capitalism at all, they support it and protect it. There is really such thing as late-stage capitalism, it is just capitalism developing over time, retaining most of its qualities but taking on new angles. Buy if it does mean anything, it means neoliberalism wrought by financialization, and that is Democrats' main political base. It's their main thing, especially as an export.

Republicans are the pro-capitalist party in the sense they want to privatize everything and help their friends

Democrats also do this they just tell you it is efficiency and "public-private partnerships" and "a generous endowment to a public institution" (that they can now defund). The charter school movement is largely Democrats, for example. They simply have different factions on their chopping block, different groups to pander to.

These are anti-capitalist ideas.

What ideas are anti-capitalist? I didn't see any.

Come on back with some more Wiki links, good buddy.

No thanks. Read the political philosophers of the enlightenment, colonialism, industrialization and proletarianizatikn, the liberal revolutions in Europe, and who emerged to identify themselves as anti-liberal once those revolutions established their ideologies as mainstream, namely monarchists, fascists, socialists, and anarchists. You cannot gain a political education through Wikipedia, it is a Cliffs Notes approach to social topics often written by often incorrect or heavily propagandized (or propagandist!) People, including literal Nazi apologists.

-1