Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on infosec.pub

22 replies

Gigasserreply
lemmy.world

Shit, why not here? Can even make a whole goddamn community for him on one of the instances.

10
lemmy.world

Meh. It’s zuck’s private platform and Zuck hasn’t been running around yelling “absolute free speech!” like some of the other billionaire megalomaniacs have.

24
feddit.nl

He is a major shareholder of a publicly traded company. Opportunistic censorship makes the company look bad because it reveals abuse of power, which reflects poorly on the company as a whole.

24
Arbiterreply
lemmy.world

if he wants a private platform he shouldn’t open it to the public

20
where_am_ireply
sh.itjust.works

Yeah, if my restaurant is open to the public, I can't deny entry to the guy who doxxes me every day. Makes sense to me! We know the results owner is an asshole, so we'll just allow it. We on lemmy never cared about law and order in the first place, we know who's good and who's bad, and based on that we rule on everything.

1
atro_cityreply
fedia.io

TIL opening up to the public means relinquishing ownership.

-3

I’m a sense it does, the people who use the platform is what makes or breaks it. Without the people, what does Elon or Zuck have? An empty website?

2

If you subscribe to science and cognitive development an adult is ~25. If you're into child soldiery as a morality standard, your results may vary.

14

You reached the end