Spyke
sh.itjust.works

I don’t like how this article hyperbolizes the amount of booing. Compare the moments of booing to the very end with the mix of cheers/jeers where that sounds like the entire audience giving a reaction.

Yes it’s important that jorkin depeanus vance got booed but misrepresenting the level of heckling from the crowd isn’t journalism that respects its readers.

283

Thanks for taking that hit for the team. No way I was going to watch that but I was certainly skeptical of the claim.

65

I'm very sorry about this. But every time I read "jorkin depeanus" a picture of the Swedish chef pops into my head

49
lemmy.nz

jorkin depeanus vance

Upvoted just for this.

Well, also for excellent critique of the journalistic integrity.

45
lemmy.sdf.org

wait... are we sure its not Jerkin Dick Vance? Oh shit thats what Jorkin means.... jfk I am an idiot

10
lemm.ee

Walking out on to speak to a bunch of Boston firefighters with some weird ass jingoist country bullshit playing: immediate boo

You're JD "Couchfucker" Vance: immediate boo

Your boss a few days before took a shit on the national gravesite of war dead by politicizing the ultimate sacrifice they made: immediate boo.

What a weird group of assholes.

160
lemmy.world

The appropriate intro music when speaking to ANY crowd in Boston is "Shippin' Up to Boston" by the Dropkick Murphys

45

They should have just done that!

Oooooh, sorry. You're way too weird, and they won't let you.

7
Aurenkinreply
sh.itjust.works

Yeah it doesn't really does it. To be fair though he did lose his leg so that probably makes it a bit tougher to stay coherent.

2
Kalystareply
lemm.ee

No way in hell they’ll let a political party use their music. Especially not Vance’s party

5
andros_rexreply
lemmy.world

It’s not like that’s stopped them from using licensed music before…

4

Fuckin savage caption writing.
[clapping] would have been sufficient but they really wanted to let the hearing impaired feel the awkwardness of the moment.

48
lemmy.world

I'm a union worker and I'm dismayed at the amount of my union brothers who vote for pieces of shit like this. Who buy into their bullshit and actually think that conservatives will help them. Talk about voting against your own interests. If you're in a union, voting for conservatives is just stupid

123
lemmy.world

Union worker myself. I am also baffled by the strong conservative undercurrent in my fellows' views. Don't know how they sustain it.

50
Bakkodareply
sh.itjust.works

Bigotry, selfishness, severe lack of intelligence and or basic reasoning skills. I can keep going.

37
Revonultreply
lemmy.world

A big part of it is the view that the left "gives money away". Union jobs are typically labor with long hous and their view is that "I work hard for the money I eared and my taxes go to the lazy".

I think that's bullshit obviously, but that is a pretty common sentiment from my experience.

28
lemmy.world

Now that you say that, yeah, I do hear that kinda shit from my older and, ironically, youngest coworkers. I've given up arguing with them.

14

Please keep arguing with them

If Trump wins i will need to flee the country for my family’s safety. And i would rather not.

15

It's a really hard mindset to break because at it's surface it make sense. Especially when you focus on fringe cases.

Like I am sure there are people who abuse the system, but it's not a good life, they don't make that much off of it. No one is living large off welfare. The "welfare queen" stereotype had been by and large disproven, but has left a lasting effect on people's opinion.

Personally I rather have a few $ slip through and make sure kids arn't starving.

11
Kalystareply
lemm.ee

They work long hours but also live in a society. So do they not like roads to drive on? Or having a military? Or public schools? Or libraries? You know. Stuff that benefits them?

9

You give them way too much credit. They look for negativity and outrage and persecution in everything, not reason and investment and public benefit. To them the biggest danger to the American economy is liberals taking the money from the working folk and giving it to the welfare queens to cover their Lexus leases or whatever.

What’s that you say? The government is taking the middle class’s money to subsidize wealthy people not paying taxes? Why are you so JeaLoUS? Why do you want to PuNiSh SuCcEsS rather than rewarding it, comrade? Now stop trying to give free food to growing children who didn’t earn it you monster!

11

Not the part they are upset with. This particular example it's with welfare. Seeing it as people getting money for not working.

A lot of people also don't understand the benefits taxes provide as you described but not what I am talking about.

11
lemmy.world

That's another reason US tax system baffles me. Why does it make it so that workers have to pay taxes this way. In my country, salary have very small tax and it's cut before the money comes into your account at all. So whatever money you egt is yours, there is no feeling of paying taxes at all. While employers will pay taxes and the taxes on profit is a lot more than tax on salary.

I personally think there's not much point of tax on the salary, they'll be spending it on other things, and whoever makes profit on that will pay the taxes on their profit. e.g. you get salary no tax, you buy clothes, vehicle, prepared food, etc. and those companies get your money, and they pay tax on profit, and then have expenses which is money that goes to other companies/people who again pay tax on profit, and their expenses goes somewhere else. All in the money is only taxed once, when there is profit. Unlike in every transaction.

3

I have been thinking about this as well. I am sure there is some probelm with a spending side tax rather than income. Probably subversion of the tax. Undertable deals, street vendors, etc. With income they make the company track and get their cut before you are able to subvert anything.

Also our economy is very credit based with the use of credit cards. If taxes were all collected at point of sale there might be probelms with defaulting and who gets the money if people don't pay.

I am not an economist. I am sure someone has thought of it already.

2
lemmy.world

If I may propose a counterpoint: all that, in some cases, sure, but certainly also other cases where they started out under the umbrella of the right's airtight propaganda screen and simply never bothered to get a second opinion, reinforced by the cult-like indoctrination claiming that everybody else is lying anyway.

Propaganda works and it takes an active effort, an effort that is severely discouraged by the existing propaganda environment, to seek out a reality check.

However, while such cases may exist, it is getting harder and harder as time goes on to justify sticking to the FOX propaganda bubble at this point.

11

You are completely right. There's an entire ecosystem of right wing propaganda channels out there but most people get their news from their friends. It's the key phenomenon behind influencer culture. And that's how most of the damage is done.

If someone has one friend who is considered knowledgeable on current affairs and that one friend watches Fox, chances are that none of his associates will have an accurate understanding of any given topic. And that's by design. The kind of tripe spread on fox news is inflammatory and salacious. The sort of noxious trash you'd share with friends in private conversation.

I realize this is what TikTok and facebook maximize: The friend effect. People learn from their friends. The kind of lies spread by right wing networks is magnified by social media and Russian bot farms.

5
warbondreply
lemmy.world

God, imagine if Biden had backed the railroad unions... Ahh, what might have been.

32
lemmy.world

The stupidity of that decision still amazes me to this day. "Railroad safety and efficacy during the shipping crisis? No! Let the monopolistic railroads regulate themselves, fuck their workers!"

31

Canada's gov't just did the same thing last week. I swear to god if any one of them sends out Labour Day emails or tweets they'll be roasted within an inch of their political lives.

8
ttrpg.network

He did. After blocking the strikes his administration stepped in to negotiate for the unions and got them most of what they wanted.

8
warbondreply
lemmy.world

I guess I meant fully backed? I'm referring to the thing Biden didn't do when he had the chance, to prove how pro-union he is.

0

Thing that he didn't do was fully back the union in the way that I meant. No schedule changes, no predictability, no sick days. No alarm at what is apparently a nationally vital resource being run poorly by people whose sole motivation is shareholder profits.

The concessions they got were paltry in comparison and it's honestly fucking shameful that we treat people this way.

0
lemmy.world

I’m dismayed at the amount of my union brothers who vote for pieces of shit like this.

There was a period in the 90s when Democrats took the DLC Neoliberal turn, basically abandoned the labor movement, and made it very easy for Republicans to run as White Nationalist labor-ish sounding candidates.

But ten years ago, you'd get some Joe the Plumber asshole whining about how he can't afford to drive to work because gasoline taxes are too expensive.

Now you've got this Yaley prick telling Boston Firefighters they are the Sad Virgins rather than the Woke Chads, because they don't hate migrants enough.

Karl Rove is rolling in his pile of rent boys right now.

5

I think it's important to note that if you only read headlines here, you might think there was overwhelming disapproval from the firefighters union. If you get your news from right wing rags, you don't hear the boos, you only hear the cheers. I'd say it was pretty mixed listening to the video, in fact more cheers than jeers. Of course that's all meaningless as we have been digitally editing crowd reactions for years now and news agencies cherry pick what they want you to hear.

The point is, go out and vote. Don't you dare think this race is in the bag, it is a hell of a lot closer than articles like this would make you believe and the actual hatred for the right is WAY less than you might imagine.

100
NOT_RICKreply
lemmy.world

One of Trenton NJ’s specialty pies is a mustard pizza. You won’t believe me but they’re actually good.

14
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Have you ever been to NJ? Literally the entire state is lousy with incredible local pizza joints. If you live in the state and order from a pizza chain, there is something wrong with you mentally.

And yeah, there is a type of tomato pie that is specific to Trenton, and it is known for it around the rest of the state (and PA, and perhaps NY). Google "Trenton Tomato Pie."

Trenton is a shit city (NJ should do better for their capital city), but people often forget that it has an insanely rich history that goes back to the Revolutionary War. It's more recent history (early 1900s) includes a ton of Italian immigrants.

That said, I love mustard and I love pizza, but they don't go together. That's a travesty.

4
NOT_RICKreply
lemmy.world

The Golden Gate Bridge is held up by Trenton steel. The city definitely isn’t what it used to be but the food is still great

5

Yeah it's a bummer. I don't know if it's a corruption problem, or what, but it's unfortunate that NJ can't/hasn't/won't fix the city up. It's still their state capital.

2

It doesn't sound good at all but I would absolutely try it. It just sounds too interesting.

5

I've tried it on pepperoni pizza as that was the only way it made any sense whatsoever in my brain.

It wasn't gross or anything, it tasted exactly how I expected. Not for me.

1

Bottoms up in Richmond VA has one called the State Fair: Spicy brown mustard, sausage, caramelized onions and roasted red peppers.

Years ago when I had it I remember it being surprisingly good.

3
lemmy.world

“Semper Fi guys,” Vance said, seeming to signpost his background as a Marine to get the hecklers to stop.

"Isn't this a magic incantation that I can invoke anytime to clear me of ill will?"

45

Bitch you spent 6 months in as a reporter; my dad killed people in a war. You are not the same kinds of Marines.

12
lemmy.world

J.D. Vance might be on a generational run for the worst VP pick of all time.

42
andros_rexreply
lemmy.world

Remember when being unable to spell “potato” was enough to derail a political career?

44

This was the weirdest thing. That dude had energy, and it tanked his run. One time he did a weird thing and it ruined his chances, now we're counting the weird things people do daily and it has no effect.

1
lemmy.ml

Lay off Vance, everyone! The risk of actually showing how stupid and robotic this guy is is that he might get replaced on the VP candidate slot. He's a terrible choice that's driving people away, but if he gets replaced literally a bowl of soup would be a better choice.

40
lemmy.world

Nah I think a replacement does worse. Not because the replacement would be worse, but it shows insane weakness/ stupidity/ inability to have a coherent strategy on the part of a Trump campaign. It shows that these guys don't know what it takes to win an election; and giving your vote to a team that doesn't know how to win an election is a wasted vote. Its the same as why Biden was struggling; losing charges compound interest because viability is a key component of whether or not people vote for you. If you aren't perceived as viable because of your polling, it bites double.

45
lemmy.sdf.org

This is my feeling as well. For Trump to replace Vance means Trump admitting he made a bad call. He makes horrible calls constantly, but I don't see him admitting to a single one.

12
lemmy.world

He wouldn’t admit it. He would find something to blame on Vance (probably wouldn’t be a strain) and then “You’re Fired!” and the red hats would chuckle and never miss a beat.

16
lemmy.world

I wonder if Vance then makes the talk show circuit and turns anti-Trump while hyping his new tell-all book

14

That would be funny as hell, and well frankly probably exactly what would happen.

4

It also kinda nukes all their bitching about replacing Biden.

Biden was never officially nominated. Vance was. It's a much bigger deal that shows weakness in the party.

9

...so you're suggesting some kind of "replacement theory".... Go on....those dumb dumbs would hate if the meaning of that phrase got flipped. lol

13

I had not considered the Mooch. That's a great point.

How long as Vance been on the ticket in Mooches?

1

Yes, but RFK may or may not be. And at this point trump might put the wrong RFK on his ticket and get the brain worm guy instead of the dead politician.

8

You get into the role of electors, who are supposed to submit the votes for who best represents the state's choice or something like that. This was written back when it would take weeks to get to DC, so who knows what would be there.

3
lemmynsfw.com

What I don't get as an outsider - this guy (like other equally weird persons as for example Mrs. Palin) is in a rather high political position.

How in the world are these people elected? Is it only about being in the preferred party or were their opponents even more incompetent?

4
lemmy.ca

Vance’s team is already attempting to spin his dismal reception, lauding his bravery for stepping into hostile territory.

They can spin it all they want but he wasn't in a gd firefight ffs.

35
lemmy.world

And they're firefighters. They lean conservative. Not as much as cops, but they still lean conservative. Yeah, it was a union, but so is the police union.

19
Corkyskogreply
sh.itjust.works

Proof that fire fighters lean conservative nationally? Because in my experience that's very much not true.

2
lemmy.world

I feel like I could do a better job than this guy and I am not a public speaker.

27

It really is kind of inspirational, It makes me feel better about how normal I am in comparison

12

Sadly I didn't think of it, but I'm determined to spread it around because it's so frigging brilliant.

6
mPonyreply
lemmy.world

lickspittle

I'm so glad this term is coming back into modern usage. It showed up twice in one episode of HOTD (and a few others) and I was happy to hear it.

Also, how tf has JDV been a politician for this long without the ability to be likeable and/or know his audience for a public speaking event? Holy shit.

2

If it matters, I didn't hear it recently at all, and it's not a word I use often - it's just that when I went deep into my lexicon for the best word for him, that's what I came up with. Maybe the lickspittles are the ones bringing it back.

2
sh.itjust.works

From urban dictionary:

blood boy

A young man who is a healthy specimen (no drinking, smoking, drugs, possibly vegan) and is hired by an tech billionaire to be a source of youthful, healthy blood for him, via regular transfusions.

I had to look it up, but it's wonderfully accurate. Thank you for teaching me a new term.

17

I mean, some of us haven't, but most voters have the memory span of a goldfish.

11

The cover photo they used makes it look like he haasaged 10 years in the last few weeks. Stumbling from embarassing screw up to screw up on the world stage when most people are already against you will really wreck your youthful demeanor.

Good. He deserves this shit.

6

bro the dem crowd boos in a way that it sounds like the candidates are being booed, i think we should probably just stick with the weird allegations to be honest.

1