Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

8 replies

monolaliareply
lemmy.world

I guess they just don’t want to bother with it any more?

19

Makes sense. Mono was necessary in the "old .NET" world, where runtimes were tied to Windows versions and the framework was a pure Windows framework. Mono made it possible to run old dotNET framework versions (up to 4.8) on other OSes.

Since dotNET Core and then dotNET 5 and higher, the framework itself is cross-platform so Mono is not necessary anymore, except for backwards compatibility for apps that use a now unsupported framework.

So it makes sense that Microsoft, after dropping the old dotNET Framework versions, also wants to stop supporting the cross-platform library that was only needed for those old versions.

13
lemmy.world

what do you mean modding was only possible on windows? I assume that you don't mean the skyrim approach of just downloading and unpacking, which has always worked under linux too. As do tools like mod organizer.

2
feddit.org

Creators of cheap Java copy throw away one of the most important aspects of Java and its copy.

-15

Having worked on both Java (as a student), then .NET, the later has a lot of features Java didn't have.

Ironically, as Wine (and Proton) uses Mono, MS contribution (among a lot of other projects) may have enabled Valve to make Proton what it is today.

9

Yeah but Java sucks! Case in point, look at the performance of Minecraft!

Gottem.

1

You reached the end

Microsoft hand original mono project off to WineHQ | Spyke