Spyke
usa·United States | News & PoliticsbyDessalines

Kamala Harris issues statement on the anti-genocide protesters in Washington DC.

https://xcancel.com/VP/status/1816490945501708660

text:

JULY 25, 2024

Statement by Vice President Kamala Harris

Yesterday, at Union Station in Washington, D.C. we saw despicable acts by unpatriotic protestors and dangerous hate-fueled rhetoric.

I condemn any individuals associating with the brutal terrorist organization Hamas, which has vowed to annihilate the State of Israel and kill Jews. Pro-Hamas graffiti and rhetoric is abhorrent and we must not tolerate it in our nation.

I condemn the burning of the American flag. That flag is a symbol of our highest ideals as a nation and represents the promise of America. It should never be desecrated in that way.

I support the right to peacefully protest, but let’s be clear: Antisemitism, hate and violence of any kind have no place in our nation.

View original on lemmy.ml
broton33reply
lemmy.world

It's true. Condemning burning the American flag is a just another form of covering your eyes or ears because you don't like what people are saying. We should both strive to improve our country, listen to protestors, and live up to the American ideals of freedom.

36

She cars more about US flagg being burned than Palestinians being killed.

🤡🤡🤡

24
Acernumreply
lemmy.world

Another point: Don't want it burned? Make a better looking flag

10
lemmy.world

How is calling out violence protests supporting genocide?

She's not pushing down Palestine or pushing Israel up.

-5

I am as confused as you are by this comment section. She's also given statements that are anti-genocide as well. You can be opposed to multiple shitty things.

10
eldavireply
lemmy.ml

that sucks; i guess i'm not voting for kamala either.

-41

all of our presidents have been enacting almost 75% of project 2025 recommendations since 1980 and they will continue to do so whether or not it's kamala doing so.

-21
eldavireply
lemmy.ml

for 4 days tried to trick myself into being a clueless voter like you so i can vote for kamala; but it turns out suffering at the hands of democrats and republics for almost 5 decades won't let me.

-22

i haven't figured that out yet.

kamala if she comes more strongly against the genocide; west or stein if she doesn't.

2
discuss.online

Geez, people here really need to learn what the downvote button is for. I can't see any reason why this statement would deserve a downvote

-6
eldavireply
lemmy.ml

lemmy.world if full of shitlibs and; since they're the biggest instance in this marxist/leninist social media network; downvotes should be expected.

-8
SoJBreply
lemmy.ml

Frankly it’s past time for the leftist instances to defederate from .world. They’ve made it clear what they support over there.

6

i like it the way it is now; we can see the them, but they can't see us.

4

To be fair, this was already her modus operandi, she just has the spotlight for it now.

20
Dessalinesreply
lemmy.ml

Anti-zionism is not anti-semitism, no matter how much western politicians like Kamala want to conflate the two.

3
some_guyreply
lemmy.sdf.org

I don't believe that you're asking in good faith. And if you are, you're fucking stupid. Fuck you.

0

I guess it's easier to say fuck you than to answer a question while facing the hypocrisy of your view of the world

0

OP literally said "violent protests", reading comprehension my bro.

3
sub.wetshaving.social

So much better than the other guy, though. Writing in a candidate will be fun for some people, but I'm choosing to vote for someone who 1) can win and 2) won't strip away freedoms in the name of religion.

32
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Whataboutism adds nothing to the conversation and fails to address the criticism being discussed.

4
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Democrats seem very eager to re-elect blue-flavored genocide. I'm very glad you feel so excited about her chances to win. I think the Palestinian children getting headshot by Israelis will be overjoyed to hear about the freedoms you will enjoy.

-15

It's a travesty, but after a cease fire is drafted and world news starts covering something else, we're still stuck with whoever is president. I've never voted based on one single issue. There's lots of stuff to consider.

5
warbondreply
lemmy.world

Isn't that going to happen regardless of who is put into office?

4
sunzureply
kbin.run

Correct our regime supports this genocide.

Gaza residents will be exterminated but we don't have to feed two party system.

6
warbondreply
lemmy.world

What does it mean to feed the system? Participate in it? Are there reasonable alternatives?

1
sunzureply
kbin.run

Voting for either party provide the regime legitimacy.

Voting 3p is a denying them legitimacy

0
warbondreply
lemmy.world

Okay, so participating in the system is feeding it. I understand your point, but it feels like you're completely dismissing the momentum our current system has. I don't think slowing it down is a possibility right now, especially since the mechanisms in place specifically prevent extreme policy changes from one administration to the next--namely, our country's 70+ years of hard-line support for Israel--so the next reasonable step to take is to steer it in a better direction.

Unfortunately, the majority of people are already steering either right or left. Refusing to engage or trying to push this massive machine in a less popular direction is, for now, like screaming into the void. So, I push with the others, hoping to create breathing room until we can change the way we do things and allow for better political representation in our democracy.

2

So, I push with the others

50% right, 50% left nothing is done.

I am breaking the tie. Clearly doing the two party circle jerk aint doing shit for anyone who works for money.

1
lemmy.world

She's going for that undecided vote. She figures everyone that fears Trump will vote for her regardless (not an outrageous idea) so she needs to secure all the right-leaning individuals that know trump is a psychopath.

Politicians gonna politics.

21

There is no undecided vote, Kamala is competing with leftists who are abstaining or voting third party. Nobody on Trump's camp would vote for Kamala ever anyways, so if she pulled left she would get more voters, not lose them.

The DNC is fine with losing, though, so she won't.

15

She's not chasing voters at all, she's chasing donors. She's also apparently whispering sweet nothings to Wall Street about firing Lina Kahn.

3

Condemning a country for carrying out a genocide ≠ antisemitism. God I'm tired of doublespeak always winning.

16

I support the right to peacefully protest

She wants to change our profile picture or whatever empty performative gesturing fits her agenda, doesn't she?

10
lemmy.world

Standard presidential strategy (pre-trump) is to "run to the center" once the primaries are over. Yes this is disappointing, but I'll judge her by her actions. She also didn't attend Netanyahu's speech, but that could just as easily have been travel logistics or it could have been a snub to Netanyahu who is courting Trump and the R's.

She's not my favorite candidate, but she's miles better than Biden, and Biden's a light-year better than Trump.

6

What's being opposed is not Judaism, but Zionism; and a not insignificant number of Jews are staunch anti-Zionists that oppose this genocide.

Also Kamala Harris' (or any political figure's) husband's religion is irrelevant, what matters is her zionist policies, and her staunch decades-long support for AIPAC.

9
kaffienereply
lemmy.world

Bernie Sanders is Jewish and he opposes the genocide. Jews are not a monolith and Harris is not her husband

2
sunzureply
kbin.run

so we just gonna trust you that Kamala gonna do better when she won't come out and say so?

she already showed more care for the american flag than Palestinians with her statement few days back.

y'all really don't understand how tone deaf that and this campaign "maybe she won't support genocide, please vote to find out" that DNC komissars are currently pushing.

get a fucking clue, clowns.

-2

Just continue talking to yourself. None of that has anything to do with what I said.

2
lemmy.world

Frantically working to prove she cannot think freely or objectively.

1

There's a decades-long history of Zionists conflating Anti-Zionism with Anti-Semitism, which is what Harris is tranparently doing here.

"Oppose Israel's settler colonial conquest of Palestine? You must be anti-semitic."

Also violent struggle against colonialism is necessary and justified, unless you want to adopt the Gandian pacifist strategy of doing your enemy's job for them:

5
lemmy.ml

You know what, nah. Fuck you Kamala, I’m writing in a socialist.

Had my vote for about 3 seconds.

-2

Fuck the two party system, voting for either side is feeding the regime.

1
kbin.run

Remember folks, you can write anyone in you want!

Fuxk the two party regime, vote third party, deny them legitimacy

-11

Calling People exercising their Constitutional rights as moron because they didn't vote for your "team"

🤡🤡

Y'all really working on OT campaigning for Kamala here haha

1
sunzureply
kbin.run

we already had him once. it was about as shiti as the rest of them lol

democrats should learn how to run a campaign if they want the vote. not trump is not a platform.

0
alekwithakreply
lemmy.world

The person, a leading presidential candidate and current vice president, skipping the meeting says a lot more than a statement put out by her staff.

8
discuss.online

No, she planned to meet with him privately. she wasn't skipping the speech out of moral principal, she just had a prior obligation

8

Well I guess I'll take yours and Jewishinsider.com's word for it.

According to ABC News "Harris pushes cease-fire after Netanyahu meets with her, Biden separately"

2
discuss.online

She planned to meet with him privately. she wasn't skipping the speech out of moral principal, she just had a prior obligation

5

Before? Who knows what she was going to say privately!

But now this public statement is enough to tell us exactly what she's going to say.

3

Jesus, we kicked Biden out because he was supporting Israel. Is she really going full-swing into loosing support of the people?

We need to demand that she steps down.

-23
discuss.online

Are you not following the news? The huge uncommitted movement started the call for him to step down.

-12

And he would've ignored them if it wasn't for the terrible debate performance. It was really only the age thing, Kamala is going to run on the exact same policies. If you thought there was going to be a change on Gaza policy I don't know what to tell you.

26

we kicked Biden out because he was supporting Israel

Nah, the wealthy donors kicked him out because they lost confidence in him, ostensibly because of his health. They don't respond to the needs and opinions of their subjects.

Is she really going full-swing into loosing support of the people?

All day, because your support doesn't matter to the rulers and their paymasters.

We need to demand that she steps down.

Sure, but again your demands don't matter to the rulers and their paymasters.

15