This is why fonts and kerning are so very important. But then again, the text in the boobs looks like it has extraneous spaces deliberately to look like that. There is a noticeable visual difference between 2! = 2 and 2 != 2 when spaced properly.
Can confirm. Am a programmer and my first thought was that mathematicians had recently come up with one of their wacky proofs that 2 does not equal 2, like how 1 is equal to 0.
Damnit. Got me. I’ve been a programmer for the better part of nearly 20 years but I was a math-heavy engineer first and I still freaking read that as “two-factorial”.
26 replies
Programmers: false
true
0
Is it me or is the top text uncentered to be on the boobs 🤨
Not sure what you mean by that, boobs are clearly the center of the picture
of every picture
Can confirm. I've seen pictures with multiple centers before.
This is why fonts and kerning are so very important. But then again, the text in the boobs looks like it has extraneous spaces deliberately to look like that. There is a noticeable visual difference between
2! = 2and2 != 2when spaced properly.Can confirm. Am a programmer and my first thought was that mathematicians had recently come up with one of their wacky proofs that 2 does not equal 2, like how 1 is equal to 0.
1 == 0.9999999…
Damn, I'm so dumb it hurts
me too but you were brave enough to ask
2 != 2
But what if it's true? Perhaps the 2 on the left is integer and the right one is character.
Or it's a language where each number is a different instance, and
!=compares addresses.factorial
Damnit. Got me. I’ve been a programmer for the better part of nearly 20 years but I was a math-heavy engineer first and I still freaking read that as “two-factorial”.
P! = NP sounds like a fun find.
What do the breasts have to do with anything?
They help you focus on what's important
I can find breasts 24/7, math problems not written on top of em
This is actually a great interview question
It really depends on where the methaphorical comma is.
If both are horny enough, they won’t even see the characters and only see the cleavage.
Wouldn't mathematicians also see this as false?
4 = 2 is not correct.
Now I look stupid, but I promise, I'm just too tired to think straight.