Spyke
kbin.social

It... It's already backed by billionaires. Owned by billionaires. How is this a question?

1

Can't be ruined by billionaires if it's already in that state upon its creation taps forehead

1

Right in the article they are discussing adding ads and premium subscriptions features in the future.

I can already see the timeline for BlueSky over the next few years:

  • Receive startup venture capital
  • Provide a useful, user-friendly service
  • Grow a userbase <-- (you are here)
  • Add a few more useful features, continue growing
  • Dominate the market, run at a loss
  • Add less useful features like ads, premium features, subscriptions
  • People complain, but most are too hooked in to leave
  • The useful features added earlier start getting removed, content gets sanitized <-- (Imgur, Reddit is here)
  • Big fundraising campaign, IPO, or bought out by big corp or the melon husk of the day.
  • Content quality goes way downhill, actively making life harder for users, volunteers and staff, bots rampant, more stupid features, monetization monetization monetization <-- (Twitter is here)
  • People leave for another useful, user-friendly service
1

You reached the end

Is Bluesky Billionaire-Proof? (The Intercept) | Spyke