Spyke
lemmy.world

Yeah, but in 1.8 trillion years, you're going to be a minute late for everything.

125
anamereply
lemmy.one

Imagine being 15 minutes late to the heat death of the universe. Unacceptable.

46

Damn right, you'd miss the Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster drink before the dinner. Not ok.

17

I mean but this should save me some hassle from my current clock that I need to adjust every 10 billion years.

33
feddit.it

Just stick a post-it with: "TODO 01/01/30000002024: set one second forward"

48

Remindme! 30 billion years

Just give me a little bit of time, I got this. You’re gonna see!

42

Surely in 30 billion years nothing could possibly happen to the supercooled strontium to throw that off, right?

16
sopuli.xyz

Does it still need a groundhog to tell it when spring is?

12
corrodedreply
lemmy.world

In clocks like this, the "set time" is often irrelevant. It's more important to know exactly how much time has passed since the last time the clock was "checked." If you're running a radio transmitter at 6ghz, that's 6 billion cycles per second. If you synch your transmitter to your clock once per second, it had better be accurate to the billionth of a second.

19
xenoclastreply
lemmy.world

This. Clocks like this are for measuring duration in a scientific context.

10

The other atomic clocks that are averaged to give us our ground truth for time.

1
xthexderreply
l.sw0.com

Standard seconds are defined based on measurable properties of a cesium atom. The historical definition of 1/86400th of a day doesn't work for science if the duration is inconsistent.

For example the statement:

Earth's Days Are Getting 2 seconds Longer Every 100,000 Years

becomes self-referencing and loses all meaning without some other reference point.

3

You reached the end