How can I fix this rotation issue?
I’m using EndeavourOS with KDE.
The display is correctly oriented when logged in but it doesn’t rotate correctly when I’m logged out.
EDIT: corrected the post. This happens when logged out, locking the screen has it displayed correctly.
173
Comments96
If you're using Wayland, you can go to Settings -> Colors & Themes -> Login Screen (SDDM) and click "Apply Plasma Settings..."
If you're using X11, it looks like you'll have to resort to hacky scripts, unfortunately.
Source: https://discuss.kde.org/t/how-to-change-monitor-layout-and-orientation-in-sddm/3377
Unfortunately, I'm having to use X11 because of work (context). Thanks for the help!
I suppose xrandr can help you here: See the Arch wiki about xrandr
SDDM Rotate Display X11
Oh, I didn't know that button existed. Great! Even though I just tried it and it didn't apply my rotation settings correctly.
Your SDDM is probably running via Xorg. SDDM Wayland
SDDm now has a wayland implementation? About time.
I’m using Wayland, where do I find this settings gui?
This is the system settings application for the KDE desktop environment.
Ah, so being on Hyprland means I can’t really gain access to this, right?
Correct. Unfortunately, it's something that each desktop environment or window manager has to implement themselves. But all the button is doing is moving some config files around, so you can probably do some digging to figure out what it's copying to where.
Yeah, I’ve largely figured out how to change all these settings from configs for myself, just always on the lookout for a nice gui. I’m slowly working to make a Linux experience I can install for my relatives that makes the transition from crapware Windows relatively painless.
XDG_SESSION_THEME=KDE got my hyprland config to work on everything except the cursor (other than in Firefox/steam for some reason). Took me way too long to find the old reddit post that had this tip, so I hope it helps!
Okay grandma, let's get you to bed
Yeah that difference in configuration definitely makes it so much better, it completely outweighs the fact that Wayland does proper multi-monitor VRR, fractional scaling, HDR and much more.
Not OP comment but I had no idea Wayland supported all of that. Thanks for sharing! I really need to leave my Linux bubble more often.
And now you know why it’s so funny to read people on the internet exclaiming that X11 is so much better despite its lack of development…
Literally yes. And you don't even need to know the exact pixel resolution of the TV.
Edit: Here are the problems with you "Wayland isn't good enough" people.
First, you don't use Wayland, so you don't even know if it's fixed whatever weird issue you encountered with it before or if it supports a niche use case, for example.
Second, Wayland won't get good enough for you until you start using it and reporting bugs. You think X11 was a bed of roses when it first started? Or do you think they bumped the version number 11 times for fun?
Bingo. So many complaints I’ve seen about Wayland have been from Nvidia users who tried it three years ago when the driver support was beyond fucked. I get Linux development moves slow sometimes but holy shit…
Not only are you wrong, you're wrong on a fundamental level.
You don't even understand Wayland at all.
Wayland is not an implementation, it is a set of communication protocol specifications that specifies the communication between a display server (compositor) and its clients. There is no single implementation and that's by design, avoiding the major pitfalls of Xorg's inflexible fat unmaintainable ass.
More over, Weston is the reference implementation of a Wayland compositor that demonstrates how to implement the protocol specifications.
As the reference, Weston includes support for important features like screen rotation & overscan/underscan.
So obviously, other Wayland compositors, like GNOME Shell and KWin, would naturally follow Weston's example and also implement screen rotation & overscan support.
Lastly, all major implementations other than wlroots(WIP) have the overscan feature, e.g. Mutter, Kwin, Weston, etc.
Ok, let me fix my language. Thanks for the reference definitions, I’ll freely admit that I’m a bit rusty.
I was considering Wayland to be the server, not the protocol. I’ll adjust the spirit of my argument with this correction, and take you through a sample use-case of a system I ran on X about a decade ago.
I was arguing that having many implementations of display clients maintained by many different DEs can lead to a contradictory and confusing management environment. I’ll adjust this argument to also include the fact that the display servers are also being separately maintained.
The system that I ran a decade ago was a research box that about a dozen scientists would remote into via vnc from their laptops. Each scientist had their choice of DE which they could run and manage via the
.xinitfile in their home directories. This gave them a lot of choice and freedom over how they set up their personal UI (people can be finicky and prefer specific workflows), while also allowing simultaneous resource usage of the data and analysis drives, and the hundreds of cpu cores for various runs, and the hundreds of gigs of ram.Such a system in Wayland-world would require each scientist to customize their environment using a DE-specific display-client-side configuration management scheme. Each of these would then have to talk to a different display server, as implemented by their specific DE. Sure, each client-server pair is using the Wayland protocol, but running a dozen display servers in the extreme case of a dozen different DE choices is not resource efficient. In a Wayland-world, I would probably have to enforce a standard server implementation of the Wayland protocol to cut down on all of the different display servers clogging up the memory and cpu usage. Sorry if one scientist wants KDE and another wants gnome and another wants i3 (now sway/wlroots), we have to cut down on diversity and user choice because of the fragmentation of the display environment. Under a single X server, it was easy to allow for user-facing interface diversity because of the standardization of the display server. Under my understanding of Wayland (as updated by your comment), supporting this interface diversity would require server-side diversity and server-side system resource duplication that would hinder the ability to efficiently present diverse options to the end users.
If there is anything that I am still misunderstanding, please continue to correct me and help me get caught up on missing the last several years of reality.
You can't be this stupid, Wayland also uses a config file, you just have a GUI button to copy the configs from inside your session to the login screen. Or do you think the button recompiles the login screen with a different configuration?
Ironically SDDM itself still runs on X11 afaik, Wayland support is still experimental.
I think you have to manually enable it (may depend on your distro/DE) but SDDM works fine with Wayland as it stands now.
Uh, all that button does is write your configuration to the sddm config. Of course you can also do that manually.
wlr-randr
kscreen-doctor
In Wayland, the compositor is the window server ( the equivalent of Xserver ). What you are looking for has to be a feature of the compositor and it is.
As others have said below, wlroots based compositors offer wlr-randr. There is also gnome-randr. For KDE, there is Kscreen-doctor. For X ( the window server being used by SDDM here ), there is xramdr.
Now, some people may see it as a problem that we have multiple Wayland implementations. I am mostly not fighting that battle. I will say that I hope these are not the same people that winge about systemd though and push for alternate init systems. I hope nobody that thinks MUSL is cool Is clinging to X11.
I would prefer that there was a common configuration standard for this stuff on Wayland. It will probably come eventually. Maybe as part of the freedesktop.org stuff.
Generally, I believe the Linux ecosystem has been stronger in areas where there has been competition between implementations ( even compilers ). I hope that Wayland will be one of those areas. As the core problems get fixed, the pace of innovation will increase. I believe we are already seeing that. There are more examples every day of things Wayland can do that X11 cannot. Let’s hope for more of that.
You left a very gracious reply so let’s not fight.
I see a certain amount of irony in the overlap between the group of people ranting that Wayland has too many implementations and the group demanding more implementations of everything else. So that was my point.
Certainly we can agree though that there is nothing wrong with demanding more of both.
One my favourite new distros, Chimera, uses both Wayland and dinit (and Turnstile ).
I am interested to see where the diversity that Wayland provides goes actually. Have you seen this?
https://github.com/CuarzoSoftware/Louvre
Not sure if you're a troll, but if you're serious, nothing I say is going to change your mind, so I won't bother.
Rotate the left display 90 degrees clockwise. Now they're both in landscape. Ta-da!
Sorry, I'll see myself out.
Put one hand on the top and one on bottom and rotate the screen by 90° or π/2 radians
This is SDDM, the default login manager used by KDE.
The Arch Wiki has an article about it, look under section 2.6.
Great answer!
From Archwiki > xrandr:
You still use X11?
SDDM is still X11 based, no matter which desktop you run with it. I have tried enabling Wayland on it, but it's been... Unstable to say the least.
That's not the point here but can you share your wallpaper? 😄
I can't remember where I found it, but here it is. I thought it might be from here (I've used these previously) but it is not.
You just need to look at the problem from a different angle
Is this when the screen is locked or when you're logged out? Those are two different things and I suspect it's the latter. That's probably sddm and I suspect it can be fixed by using Wayland with it. Should be some option in
/etc/sddm.confor so.I corrected the post, thanks for calling it out! It’s fine when locked but the issue happens when logged out.
Turn your head
Can I have that wallpaper?
https://wallpapersden.com/linux-retro-wallpaper/1336x768/
Edited the photo and used bing search lol
Thank you
Search gruvbox Linux I think I found the light version https://i.pinimg.com/originals/c8/7d/32/c87d329daeef94762661443e3e934246.png
Fix what? It looks perfect /s
usually monitors can be freely rotated. if yours can't, the back usually has a square vesa mount on the back and you can just take out the four screws and reattach it the way you like.
I kinda love this aside from it being unusable
I recommend playing Penguin Pursuit on Lumosity
The command is
Seems fine to me
Your screen on the left appears to be rotated vertically, rotate it 90 degrees clockwise and it should be better.
Easily fixable, just use Windows bro
If you think this is very witty and a gotcha, you're wrong. This argument doesn't work in reverse because whoever is using Linux already knows all about Windows, since, y'know, it has most of the Desktop market in its grip
This is like yelling about straight pride
It's satirical/sarcastic, I even added the bro and everything. You see Linux users doing the same on every fucking Windows post so I couldn't resist.
Damn, guess I got wooshed
This sort of passive-aggressive "help" feels like a relic of the early 2010s we could do without.
OP probably wasn't aware it was an SDDM issue. Or even what SDDM is, hence the question.
You're not their teacher. It's not your job to decide how much effort they've put forth, or to grade whether or not that is sufficient.
And if they documented their research process, you'd say "tldr just ask the question." Stop trying to be paternalistic and gatekeepy. Just answer or don't.
That's totally the biggest problem with the internet. And definitely deploying self-important moderaptors is the way to fix it.
/s, of course. Get off your high horse.
The archives! Why won't anyone think of the archives!?
If we have room for comments like yours in the archives then we have room for legitimate questions by beginners in there too. Your post history shows a significant amount of deleted comments and downvotes. I bet they were all very productive and helpful comments for the archives, right?
We aren't Ubuntu here. As far as I'm concerned OP's question was just fine.
The goal of Ubuntu's help forum is to solve users' problems efficiently and effectively. That goal is better achieved if questions are posed in certain optimal ways.
The goal of Lemmy is for people to have discussions (like this one! ;). That goal is not better achieved with well posed questions.
How do you think the OP is supposed to know that "SDDM" is the issue to look up? You don't get to enforce another person's effort. If all you want to provide is "you're looking for 'SDDM,' that would provide help and empower them without sounding like you're biting the newbie for not knowing everything.
Yes. I would assume that the problem is in X11 or Wayland before thinking it could be SDDM, frankly. But even then, googling "Linux login screen" doesn't immediately reveal SDDM to be the point of concern.
I'm not moving any goalposts at all. I'm expressing how inexperience and bad assumptions can make one's searching unfruitful through no fault of their own. That's all I've ever been saying.
Ah, you made an edit. Yeah, "kde login rotation" does, but "EndeavourOS login rotation" gives you no results mentioning SDDM. Giving people the benefit of the doubt costs you nothing over assuming that they're lazy, and the added bonus is that you don't sound like a jerk.
This type of answer wouldn't exist if people typed the question into google instead of reddit/lemmy/forums/etc...
When you search for a problem like this one, often the results with helpful answers are on forums. These wouldn't exist if no one ever asked their question on a forum.
To put it another way, google doesn't create any content. That's what we're here to do instead.
Yup, and it might be necessary to reproduce a lot of the answers that people used to find on reddit.
I have no problem with questions on forums, sometimes I ask them myself, but I think that if you expect people to try to answer your question, people should be able to expect you to have tried looking for an answer yourself.
I don't know about other people, but it's way easier to google something than to ask a question and then wait for the answer. I'm not OP, but if I've asked a question, it's only because I've exhausted my ability to find the answer on its own.
Sometimes people like community conversation; it often gets to the heart of the issue better than parsing a semi-related post from 12 years ago, and it allows back-and-forth discussion to get details and drill down issues.
On top of that, redundancy for technical issues is never something we should reject.
Why though? Seriously, why is it a problem for you if they ask here first, instead of asking somewhere else first? What is the actual harm to you?
Some people would rather interact with other humans. Some prefer to find their answers without interacting with other humans. It's all good.
What is the harm, to you or anyone else, when someone makes a forum their first resort, instead of last? If having people ask questions here that aren't "good questions" according to you is bothering you, perhaps you are the problem.
I support this idea, and based on the things I read here, it seems to me that different cultures have different norms for asking a question, and that's a good thing, but can create not so pleasant social situations here in the internet
My goodness, people complain that this place lacks content. A person as for help which creates content for the site and you come to bash on them?
Come kiddo! You can do better.
Google wouldn't have any answers if no one ever asked their question in a forum instead.
I wouldn't presume to judge this, and I dont think you should.
There is no issue related to a deluge of "invalid" or even redundant forum questions. That's simply not a real problem.
Then offer education or ignore the post. You know what's easier than OP googling the question? You not responding to OP if you don't have anything of value to add. You're here with a passive aggressive "let me Google that for you" bullshit attitude yet YOU'RE upset at OP for not being better at searching for their answers?
I agree people should put more effort into trying to figure it out on their own and learning how to ask good questions but the tone of your comments is more detrimental to the quality of these communities than a "stupid question" ever will be.
You could use Windows 11 from Microsoft, it can do both landscape and portrait.
Bruh
I couldn’t resist
Right? I had to do the same
I vow to do the same on each appropriate thread my Liege
It's only right
It's true though, every thread about Windows is full of Linux users saying how you should just use Linux, and others saying they still can't because it still doesn't work properly after all this time. Then you get the Linux users saying "iT jUSt wORks", then posting shit like this demonstrating that it clearly still doesn't
If you think this is very witty and a gotcha, you're wrong. This argument doesn't work in reverse because whoever is using Linux already knows all about Windows, since, y'know, it has most of the Desktop market in its grip
This is like yelling about straight pride
You type well for someone holding their head at 90°
Jokes on you, I typed this on a mobile device
If you think this is very witty and a gotcha, you're wrong. This argument doesn't work in reverse because whoever is using iOS already knows all about Android, since, y'know, it has most of the mobile market in its grip
This is like yelling about straight pride
Sure.
I could also shoot off both my testicles with an M1911.
Is that what it takes to get two different desktop orientations using Linux?