Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on sh.itjust.works

64 replies

lemmy.world

Once a cobra bit elon's leg. After five days of excruciating pain, the cobra died of burnout.

76

If Elon buys out your company, it will be so successful that your revenue rolls over and you actually lose money.

36
Slovenereply
feddit.nl

I'm pretty sure it's a satyrical account.

11
sp3ctr4lreply
lemmy.zip

Better hide the wine and the wood nymphs.

20

good thing I'm in town selling my SatyrTrap Pro ^TM^ (patent pending) !

2
lemmy.world

But only ever trolls on posts with left-leaning undertones, probably trying to devalue the underlying message by adding distracting nonsense

3

My parents still do. They can't fathom that a billionaire could be anything but a genius to aspire towards.

23
lemmy.world

He tried really hard to be called the "real life Tony Stark" and he was successful until, idk, he fired his publicist? Whoever that was did a hell of a job making this moron look smart

19

I bet that publicist quit the day he called the diver who rescued those kids in Thailand a "pedo guy". That or he just got really lucky without a publicist for a long time until his opinions started being more important than his image or success.

5

If he didn't have an unfiltered public forum, people would probably still think that he is some eccentric genius.

2

Remember, this is why your party needs the Bard. It's not because of the Lute. ;)

1
discuss.tchncs.de

Almost no one in your bubble/perception unfortunately. There are still lots of people that are only aware of him being a POS but still think he’s a genius.

13
lemmy.world

He's clearly smart. That's because he has a lot of money. Only smart people have money and the more money you have the more smarter you get.

10

For some reason I read glasses and in my mind I was: "Well I usually don't notice when I wear my glasses so it does makes sense..."
Maybe I need new ones...

4

I mean, you never had to believe in gasses or vacuum. They're real, so they don't depend on your belief or lack thereof.

"Reality is that which doesn't disappear when you stop believing in it"

3

Like when he said that the CyberTruck beat a Porche Porsche 911 in a quarter mile whilst towing a Porche Porsche 911, but Engineering Explained did the math and called BS. Then backed up the math by actually doing the quarter mile to prove it.

57
lemmy.world

I read that a few times…is he saying Porsches break down a lot so ya the truck would win. But then I noticed the spellings. So ya a cyber truck would beat a Porche, they’re cheap knock offs of Porsches

7
Maalusreply
lemmy.world

The entire gimmick was "cybertruck is faster loaded with an entire car and towing it, than the car itself". They didn't mention they didn't go for the entire 1/4 mile. They didn't mention they cherrypicked the slowest Porsche there is. They didn't mention they lightened the trailer etc. It was 100% made in their favour, yet they still lost.

17
lemmy.world

IMO a lightened trailer is fair. It's really all about power to weight ratio. If a cyber truck could tow a car faster than that car can drive itself, then it means the power to weight ratio is that much higher. Torque also plays a role. They'd have to use a negative weight trailer for it's weight to change that.

Guessing they ran the numbers and realized the instant torque of the electric motor would give them an edge at the very beginning, based on the "didn't go the entire 1/4 mile" bit, which just means it takes less than 1/4 mile to make up for the higher torque in that particular scenario.

Also the skill of the drivers would play a role unless they set up an automated system (and tuned it right for both vehicles).

1
Maalusreply
lemmy.world

No, the marketing was "a tesla towing a porsche is faster on a 1/4 mile than the porsche". And then they only tested it up to 1/8th, and "extrapolated" that it would win 1/4. Which it didn't. It simply was false advertising, even with everything going "their way".

5
lemmy.world

Yeah, I don't disagree with the way you put it there, the only part I disagree with in your comment above is that using a lightweight trailer should be considered a part of the cheating.

1

Why isn't it part of cheating? You wouldn't be able to use that trailer on public roads. It's not that they used a lightweight trailer, it's that they took an already barebones trailer and then cut and hacked away at it to make it lighter.

1

Silly human. You used earthling mathematics. On Mars (where Lonnie is from), physics works a different way. See? Lonnie is the genius all his sycophants say he is.

2
lemmy.cafe

watermarking a tweet in response to a tweet, neither of which are yours, is crazy

(i get it’s probably not you OP, ur good)

26
lemmy.world

Is seeing is, explicitly, believing, then we need to talk about magicians.

20

Naïve realism has entered the battle.

1

The better approach is to go out and try to disapprove the things you believe. That's how science works, and that's what will get you to the truth.

8

That is what is frustrating. He doesn't really mean what you "see". He means go with your gut/surface level feelings and understanding. If you "see" something that goes against what you see or what you feel without any specialized knowledge on the subject, go with your priors.

2

I wouldn't call Musk a conservative per se, he like is buddy Thiel is a Libertarian - which doesn't make his any better.

2
Krauerkingreply
lemy.lol

This is also how they keep proving themselves wrong in hilarious ways.

11

Said by the person with the product that literally controls what you see.

1

Do I think Elon is a genius? Not really, but I do know he just uses Twitter to troll people and look like an idiot on purpose. It prolly gets his rocks off in some way.

-11