Despite the controversies and the write-in campaign, the district's heavy Republican tilt, created by Wisconsin's strong Republican gerrymander, allowed Schmidt to easily prevail in the general election with 55% of the vote.
So the tape came out after he won the primary but before the election. The GOP tried to push a write in campaign for his primary opponent. Some said they'd vote for the dem candidate. But due to republican gerrymandering, the sucker still won.
Nah that wasn't due to gerrymandering, or no more than any other election at least. That was due by the fact that Republican voters will vote for the the party no matter what. He could have been having a bukake party at the parking lot and they still would have voted for.
Remember folks: while the Right wing of American politics actively tries to distract you with culture war nonsense, the topics they choose for their culture war are chosen from their own personal closet of skeletons.
💀 everyone's getting on my case about this I was doing some work and watching a YouTube video + its 2:30 AM in my time zone. Give me like 12 hours to reply at least lol
It again depends on what someone considers LGBT rights. I am gay, I oppose a business being prohibited from denying me service based on my sexuality. To a ton of people that is me opposing LGBT rights. A lot of religious (idk how many there are overall though) LGBT people oppose gay marriage. There is the whole "LGB drop the T" movement which are basically gay terfs, and probably to some extent oppose LGBT rights. There are a ton of examples because LGBT people can have any spectrum of beliefs and LGBT rights can mean anything to different people.
There's also "cunt", which (depending on your English accent mainly) can be considered perhaps more offensive than "dick".
We Finns also use "vittu" very much in the same way English uses "fuck", but "vittu" translates more or less directly to "cunt". "Fuck you" in Finnish would be "haista vittu", which translates to "sniff a cunt". But just like the English "fuck you", the actual meaning of the words isn't the meaning in the context of telling someone to bugger off.
And there, see, "bugger", latent homophobia again.
Its weird, but in private conversation to mates etc we use "cunt" and "bugger" a lot. Its general banter down here, though it doesnt get said professionally, in front of kids etc. They're working class words here
It's really not weird, was my point. Unless you're American? In America, in an American accent, "cunt" is very hard to utilise as a term of endearment. With Aussies? Zero problem.
Remember the Hungarian homophobe official caught in a huge gay orgy, which also had other bigots from government in it? He broke his nose jumping out of a window, if I'm not mistaken.
I mean, if the news was so widespread that it got on Wikipedia I think he would’ve sued if it was false. An LGBTQ site putting words in their mouth seems a prime candidate for an easy defamation lawsuit.
If Schmidt gives a truly amazing blow job, this may be his transformation story. Started out as a fascist, Christian nationalist politician, and after a getting tragically shunned goes on a journey of self-discovery and becomes the sweetest sex worker in Wisconsin.
I can only imagine how bad a Republican orgy would be. Not enough lube, no dental dams, no wet wipes, just one set of sheets for each bed, bad lighting, terrible music.
Homebrew is always acceptable. I just haven’t had real moonshine since I lived in Kentucky. And miss me with that mass produced moonshine. Also none of my friends have the room to brew beer, but the wife and I would love to try sometime, and it would be amazing to serve at a gay orgy.
When I have a yard I want to grow fruit to start vinting.
Days after the primary, it was revealed that Schmidt had been the victim of a blackmail attempt by a worker on his family farm, who had a video of Schmidt performing oral sex on another man.[3] The same week, another story came to light in which Schmidt had been charged with a felony for choking another worker on his farm, but had pleaded it down to a misdemeanor.[4]
Christ did say that or something similar, but Baha'u'llah added that receiving gifts is also important, as everyone needs the opportunity to give, and no matter how little you think of yourself, everyone deserves gifts.
The original training material for ChatGPT was the biggabytes of videos found at Epstein's estate after he murdered himself. That version was way ahead of it's time, you just had to know what kind of prompt it was ready for.
Yeah I interpreted it as a joke, but in hindsight they did exclude the /s or jk so we need to follow Poe's Law and banish him to hell forever and all time.
Lots of bots and stuff in here claiming AI video from 2022.
I guess this is the new con/fascist/nazi defense reflex. Or.. I guess it's the same fake news defense, just now we're blaming computers instead of just people
Yeah but it was more of a condition than a social wedge issue. Hierarchal toxic masculinity shit, not so much class persecution, and didn't in a lot of cases (I might be remembering a Greek thing, so easy to mix them up when roman culture is mostly a shitty port of Greek culture) topping/bottoming get based on age? Or did that not carry over?
Apparently he's not just a good Christian, but a great one - he sucks AND swallows. A true Christian, a truly valuable person, is one who gives and enjoys physical sexual pleasure. Not someone who disdains human sexuality and disavows any human desires. It's all just sex - no labels are needed, it doesn't matter who is giving a blowjob to whom, as long as people are doing it and enjoying it. That's the only thing that matters.
Considering that Peter Schmidt the man accused of sucking another man’s penis admitted that he, Peter Schmidt, did indeed suck a penis I’m not sure what other evidence you need?
Would you be more likely to believe it if self-admitted cock gobbler Peter Schmidt slobbered all over your knob?
If he sucked my cock, yes, I would be more inclined to believe it than some anonymous meme on a site stating a video is circulating of him sucking a cock. I guess all you need is the meme.
Yes, I also really want a future of misinformation where everything is shit and it's hard to find good information? What a great future that will be...
We're already seeing shit that gets into that level of shit. It's only going to get worse. Politics is the prime example.
In some capacity, it'll be beneficial to society, because now you can trust nothing, you can assume nothing, and you have to take EVERYTHING at face value, otherwise you got pwned by some kid fucking around with an AI. Which given the amount of political misinformation, and just misinformation in general that we consume, and repeat to others. Would be a net positive i think.
Fascinated that people are down voting my original comment, but whatever, that's how the internet works. I like watching things burn because it forces people to give up their preconceptions, and i think that's when we're the most true to ourselves, the most authentic, genuine, and most socially functional.
Something i never really enjoyed was this weird sub behaviorism of some redditors to "reflexively downvote something because it's bad" The amount of comments i saw from people who would accidentally downvote a post calling out a rapist for example, was something else. Never thought i would see a time in my life, where people mindlessly consumed to the point where that was a genuine take that actually happened.
sora is doing pretty good, some cleanup editing on top and some structured environments will certainly do it. Need i remind you every expose video every is highly compressed? It's pretty easy to hide a lot of this shit. Though i also think it'll be a few years at least before videos are a big thing.
The only thing I can come up with about his anti LGBTQ positions is that he checked a box that says he believes businesses have the right decline to work with things that conflict with their religious beliefs and they trans girls shouldn't compete in women's sports.
Now dont get me wrong, I strongly oppose one of these (denial of service) and the other im still on the fence about. But you really have to work to make this some hypocritical positions because you had sex with a man.
I've seen nothing that indicates hes very vocal on anti LGBTQ issues, let alone, as this tweet implies, one of the loudest.
So I'll go ahead and say the tweet is false, and if not, grossly misleading.
“He who shouts the loudest” is a common phrase used to indicate someone who is acting like a hypocrite. It does not mean they are literally the loudest anti LGBTQ representative out there. He is a member of the GOP which opposes rights for the LGBTQ community. That is what makes him a hypocrite.
Nothing in this tweet is misleading. I don’t expect you to agree with that though since your comment implies you don’t support trans rights (how the fuck is someone on the fence about another human having rights) and are likely a GOP voter anyway.
It does not mean they are literally the loudest anti LGBTQ representative out there.
Agreed. But it implies a lot more than simply "acting like a hypocrite." It implies the person is constantly or vociferously condemning something. Not just one time checking a box.
I don’t expect you to agree with that though since your comment implies you don’t support trans rights
The fact that you are turning to a baseless ad hominem and misrepresenting my position in order to claim that is why I won't agree just exposes how little faith you have in your position.
LOL! I love that you are in here acting like you are just being reasonable. If you are a member of the GOP, and gay, then you are a hypocrite.
Everyone can see your BS for what it is. I’ll bet you go around saying you are fiscally conservative but socially liberal too. Get out of here with your garbage.
If you are a member of the GOP, and gay, then you are a fucking hypocrite.
I'm not sure I agree, but you are welcome to that opinion and it's besides the point. The point being that using the phrase "he who shouts loudest" for this guy is, at best, grossly misleading. The only positions I know about him are pretty mildly "anti gay" if you can even call them that at all... additionally, it doesn't even appear to be a big issue for him because I don't see him pushing it constantly.
Attacking me and making shit up about me because you need me to fit in some little box doesn't change this reality. Sorry.
I won't look up actual facts I will just make stuff up to sound plausible in the thinnest margin and that's all I need to do. Because real life is just like court. Reasonable doubt is all we need!
well some other comments pointed out that it's 2 years old so deepfake video is much less likely. But if this was from the last few weeks I'd say this goes beyond reasonable doubt. In politics there's always going to be people with motives to destroy a politician they think is harmful (which in this case he really is, of course). I think scrutiny is needed in any case. But if there's no evidence for fakery, I don't care about "reasonable doubt" either.
Forgive me for not looking for a video of a man sucking another man's dick, that's not my kink. I don't want to read articles describing the act either, with the risk of embedding a still. I don't even live in the same country as this so I couldn't care less if he actually did it, I just thought it was weird this wasn't mentioned in the preceding comments.
I'm not asking you to do anything that has anything to do with anything sexual. I am asking you to simply provide any sort of credible evidence towards your accusations of it being a deep fake. If you have knowledge of deep fakes you surely know where to find evidence to back up your claims. Or show me how you think it's something other than the rape victims say it is.
Like I'm all for proving that an innocent person is innocent. But at least have something besides just yelling random crap that it could be. "It's a fake video" with no evidence is not productive nor is it accurate. It's the blatant attempts from a party that does not understand what logical thinking means.
I didn't declare or yell anything, I asked a question.
What "rape victims" are you talking about? Seriously, what the actual fuck are you talking about? This post is about an anti-LGBT guy getting caught being gay. You're the one yelling baseless nonsense.
I think pointing out the hypocrisy of these people is good overall. I don't think it is saying being gay and giving blow jobs as a man is bad. It is saying someone that is opposing the rights of gay people getting caught having some sort of gay sexual acts shows how ridiculous it is to be against the rights of others to be gay.
It just to show the hipocrisy. Republicans oppose everything homosexual but at the sane time show that it is something some still partake in. If anything, it shows that being a republican is hiding yourself. Giving a blowjob to men is what he opposes, but what he apparently enjoys. The blowjob itself is not the subject of the post.
you are completely misrepresenting the story... the entire point is that he is a hypocrite, the fact that he is a hypocrite about being gay is completely irrelevant
If some idiot spent his life trying to make rollercoasters illegal, and then was photographed on a roller coaster have a great time, what moral value would you give to "Anti-coaster polician caught on video riding coaster."
The headline is highlighting that the guy is a hypocrite. If it just said "Politician is a Hypocrite." Basically everyone would be like "wtf is this article is about? How is he a hypocrite? Who wrote this uninformative headline?
I think I'm thinking "lefties don't like him already; it doesn't matter if he gave a BJ or not, it doesn't matter if he's a hypocrite or not. Right-wingers will see the headline and their takeaway will be 'gross, he's gay' and the hypocrisy will be of minor importance."
So I think your rollercoasters example is not the same in my mind. But maybe it is the same and I'm just being weird about this. Most people seem to think so from the answers I've had :)
You aren't wrong that a small minority of people will see that line and think 'eww gross" and while that's shitty in principle, it's a reader problem, not a headline problem.
I will take the hot take devil's advocate position, and mostly agree with this. I'm not sure it really does too much to call out these clowns for their hypocrisy, other than make everyone sort of, feel better about their own preconcieved political dispositions, and dunk on a homophobe. The people who support these freaks are operating on a different sort of framework. Often it's not straight up denialism as much as it is like, some sort of idiotic conception about the fall of western culture, or about god punishing the wicked from some shit that's stupidly cited in leviticus, or paul being an asexual rapture doomer.
I think the only way that this is really like, blown, bu dum tsss, blown up into a larger issue, right, at least, for libs, rather than being like, a one-off easy dunk case, is if we maybe extrapolate that all, or a large portion, of these homophobic crusaders is also just super closeted gay dudes. I don't know whether or not that's the case, like disproportionately, right, but I think it's probably not good to sort of, operate on that assumption, or extrapolate this to be the case, based on these kinds of incidents. I dunno, guys, he could be bisexual, he could be bi. This would be typical bisexual behavior, honestly. And, is it gay to be bisexual, fellas?
In any case, I mostly hate this dude more for the fact that he's a homophobic shitbag, more than the fact that he's giving someone a blowie. The blowie is probably his best quality, I would say. You think his head game is strong, or not? Be honest now, I don't wanna hear that his political views prevent him from giving good head, if that were the case then bipolar sacred geometry crystal girlfriends would be out of business.
People seem to have weirdly missed that the person he sexually assaulted was an employee of his farm. Would you like your job to depend on receiving your boss' secret blowjobs? (Quit answering yes you fucking perverts!)
He isn't just a hypocrit, like all Republicanspoliticians rich people he abuses his power to extract whatever demeaning things he wants from other people, starting with their underpriced labor and apparently moving on to also extracting their seed directly as well.
I mean I guess he supports farm workers..
Yeah, but these subsidies are starting to get out of hand...
Government handies!
Out of hand and into mouth, even!
Say what you will about Republicans, but at least this guy and Lauren Boebert are willing to roll up their sleeves and get their hands dirty.
Did their hands get dirty? Or did they just swallow?
It's an oral tradition.
^Yaaay democracy…
Oh no, you see he was just passing by when he noticed that the farmworker was possessed and he decided to perform an impromptu exorcism.
It's like a snakebite. He's sucking the demon seed out.
is that how that works?
I should get possessed more often.
I can help you, step bro.
Oh really? Would you say you would sell your soul for it?
̶̡͕͙͈̙͛J̵̡̛̰̙̪̙u̴̠̟̘̎̓s̶̪͐͜t̴̡̞̳̓̔̿̒ ̴̗̹̖̰̎͛ş̷̗̈́́i̵͛̎̌͗͘͜g̸̤̳̲̪̮͐̑̑͒̍n̷͚͆ ̸̻͌̂h̶͖̠̗̾̈́͆͜e̸͖̻͛r̷̨̢̾̈̅͝͝ě̶̡̫͉̟͉́̐̑͠ ⛧
So the tape came out after he won the primary but before the election. The GOP tried to push a write in campaign for his primary opponent. Some said they'd vote for the dem candidate. But due to republican gerrymandering, the sucker still won.
'the sucker', I see what you did there ;-)
It is Mr Suck for you
You misspelled "erection"
Nah that wasn't due to gerrymandering, or no more than any other election at least. That was due by the fact that Republican voters will vote for the the party no matter what. He could have been having a bukake party at the parking lot and they still would have voted for.
And gerrymandering works by the politicians choosing their voters rather than the other way around.
In this case by artificially making sure that there's enough "GOP no matter what" voters in the district to guarantee a Republican victory.
Remember folks: while the Right wing of American politics actively tries to distract you with culture war nonsense, the topics they choose for their culture war are chosen from their own personal closet of skeletons.
He won his election by the way
Despite Republican Party opposition and a write-in campaign - but because gerrymandering it was a cinch for him to win
Come on dude...
cinch /sĭnch/
noun
A girth for a pack or saddle.
An encircling cord, band, or belt.
Something easy to accomplish. synonym: breeze.
A sure thing; a certainty.
"Their team is a cinch to win the tournament."
He Who Giveth Head Shall Be Greatly Rewarded.
John 42:69
Trump Bible Edition
I wonder how many conservatives would be liveral if they received some good therapy.
Why do you think they do their best to restrict access to mental healthcare?
I am always feeling liveral after my latest transplant.
You could have a million gotchas. A trillion examples of hypocrisy. They dont care. They care about power.
Well, they are ready to take it. What are you going to do about it?
Well he was taking it. Right in the tonsils. 😅
I'm a little confused on what the hypocrisy is because we don't know what he said about homosexuality
You do know what the LGB in LGBTQ stands for, right?
The tweet doesn't say anything about it though. Just "Opposes LGBT rights" which means a lot of different things to different people
That's fair.
To explore that, what is the scenario of a person that opposes LGBT rights, participates in LGBT activity, and isn't a hypocrite?
*crickets
💀 everyone's getting on my case about this I was doing some work and watching a YouTube video + its 2:30 AM in my time zone. Give me like 12 hours to reply at least lol
It again depends on what someone considers LGBT rights. I am gay, I oppose a business being prohibited from denying me service based on my sexuality. To a ton of people that is me opposing LGBT rights. A lot of religious (idk how many there are overall though) LGBT people oppose gay marriage. There is the whole "LGB drop the T" movement which are basically gay terfs, and probably to some extent oppose LGBT rights. There are a ton of examples because LGBT people can have any spectrum of beliefs and LGBT rights can mean anything to different people.
As a gay man, I don't know why people think "cocksucker" is an insult.
Latent homophobia or misogyny. Pussylicker isn't ever used as an insult.
I have colleagues from Romania to Italy... cunnilingus is very much seen that way with their culture.
There's also "cunt", which (depending on your English accent mainly) can be considered perhaps more offensive than "dick".
We Finns also use "vittu" very much in the same way English uses "fuck", but "vittu" translates more or less directly to "cunt". "Fuck you" in Finnish would be "haista vittu", which translates to "sniff a cunt". But just like the English "fuck you", the actual meaning of the words isn't the meaning in the context of telling someone to bugger off.
And there, see, "bugger", latent homophobia again.
In circles we go, from homophobia to misogyny.
Its weird, but in private conversation to mates etc we use "cunt" and "bugger" a lot. Its general banter down here, though it doesnt get said professionally, in front of kids etc. They're working class words here
It's really not weird, was my point. Unless you're American? In America, in an American accent, "cunt" is very hard to utilise as a term of endearment. With Aussies? Zero problem.
Up yours, pussylicker!
Gonna have to buy me dinner first
You sneaky fatherfucker.
There are a couple terms used pejoratively against lesbians that reference that.
Half of the population loves to suck cock. The other half? Love to get their cock sucked.
Omg! Like every time! Every time there's an anti LGBT politician they're always caught doing something gay!
Like it's some kind of law of the universe!
I've always known no straight man could really give that much of a fuck about gay people
What i don’t understand is why they punish themselves instead of just saying “Hey! It’s ok to be gay!” And pass laws showing this
Remember the Hungarian homophobe official caught in a huge gay orgy, which also had other bigots from government in it? He broke his nose jumping out of a window, if I'm not mistaken.
Haha, reminds me of when someone in school said "he ran into a wall with a boner and broke his nose".
hahaha I love this
Republicans don't want to control everyone, they want someone to stop them from giving into their own feelings.
Well, they also want that.
they're in denial
Well, at least he practices brotherly love ...
Bro job
Not gay
Next!
If he said "no homo" he is in the clear, we can't do anything boys.
But he can’t say that with a dick in his mouth.
That's why he learned ASL.
It's for charity honey, next!
Why no link 🔗 to video?
Probably because it's considered revenge porn. Legality is a concern there regardless of who's on the other end.
But its not revenge porn, its whistle blowing. Let the people watch!
Because this is literally fake news or propaganda to show how easy it is for people to lap up bullshit without sources from a tweet probably...
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2022/08/republican-campaign-rocked-gay-extortion-attempt/
My man…
Yeah, I found that already from the wiki. Their citation leads to nothing. I cannot find the video either.
It just links to Wispolitics.com. I can't find any blowies either.
Smells like Republican bullshit to me.
I mean, if the news was so widespread that it got on Wikipedia I think he would’ve sued if it was false. An LGBTQ site putting words in their mouth seems a prime candidate for an easy defamation lawsuit.
Watch for Wiki edits now, because I could find nothing to corroborate the story
Rightwingers really aren't worth the oxygen they consume, huh?
Stealing our air.
I mean, if their only solution to climate change is malthusianism; they're free to martyr themselves.
If Schmidt gives a truly amazing blow job, this may be his transformation story. Started out as a fascist, Christian nationalist politician, and after a getting tragically shunned goes on a journey of self-discovery and becomes the sweetest sex worker in Wisconsin.
I want to watch and rewatch this film
Stories like this are very upsetting, all these republican religious nuts out there sucking cock and going to gay orgies. I might have to convert.
Yeah but they have to fuck republicans. Anarchists have gay orgies too, we just do affordable drugs at them
I can only imagine how bad a Republican orgy would be. Not enough lube, no dental dams, no wet wipes, just one set of sheets for each bed, bad lighting, terrible music.
No thank you.
If you use a dental dam that's a creepy amount of prep
Affordable drugs? Like caffeine?
Like homegrown cannabis, bottom shelf booze, or homegrown hallucinogens
No homebrew?
Homebrew is always acceptable. I just haven’t had real moonshine since I lived in Kentucky. And miss me with that mass produced moonshine. Also none of my friends have the room to brew beer, but the wife and I would love to try sometime, and it would be amazing to serve at a gay orgy.
When I have a yard I want to grow fruit to start vinting.
Affordable drugs? Oh dear I've been going about this all wrong.
Now this is the kind of political news I want to see.
All politicians should be kept busy with being sexual deviants, so that their avarice and freakery is not let loose on actual policy.
God bless the perverts, for they do no harm.
He's literally doing harm by supporting anti-LGBT policies against exactly the people you're talking about.
If he called "no homo" before he sucked the dick then it doesn't count.
We're they wearing socks? With socks on its not gay at all.
The hooked rubber band things the military uses to cuff their trousers at the top of their boots are called blousing straps.
We used to say "It's not gay if you kept your blousing straps on," when I was in, lol.
Wait... I thought you were supposed to say that after the fact not before...
Brb, I have some calls to make.
Is this real?
Straight off Wikipedia
Choking his chicken maybe.
Boom. Roasted.
Roasted chicken maybe.
or is this just fantasy
Caught in a cock slide
No escape from hypocrisy
Open your mouth
Look up at this guy and see...
Open your eyes, look up to the skies and see I'm just a poor boy, I need no sympathy
Yes, but it's fairly old.
Damn I guess Republicans treat their employees better than I thought.
And he loves his constituents...he loves them individually one at a time.
'Tis better to give than receive
I think Jesus said this.
Christ did say that or something similar, but Baha'u'llah added that receiving gifts is also important, as everyone needs the opportunity to give, and no matter how little you think of yourself, everyone deserves gifts.
this is why 69 was invented.
I was going to say it sounds like some potential AI BS but since this happened over 2 years ago the AI back then wasn't as good.
The original training material for ChatGPT was the biggabytes of videos found at Epstein's estate after he murdered himself. That version was way ahead of it's time, you just had to know what kind of prompt it was ready for.
this comment is so stupid i think it might actually be funny
Yeah I interpreted it as a joke, but in hindsight they did exclude the /s or jk so we need to follow Poe's Law and banish him to hell forever and all time.
im sure it was a shitpost, i see no other context where it would make any sense.
And given how AI models nab training data, it seems likely.
Too blunt for a joke, mate
Lots of bots and stuff in here claiming AI video from 2022.
I guess this is the new con/fascist/nazi defense reflex. Or.. I guess it's the same fake news defense, just now we're blaming computers instead of just people
He still won, thanks to gerrymandering
Where is the video?
shame is a gell of a drug
Yes. But here he's clearly ingesting it, rather than the transdermal application you would expect to see recommended with a gel.
It was just to make the pigs jealous, though!
A tale as old as time...
True as it can be
Barely even friends
Then somebody bends
Unexpectedly
Nah, this shit wasnt always a wedge issue.
Literally the only thing ancient rome got right.
(Ancient Greece also had baklava)
Unless you bottomed
Some people enjoy that.
What
'Bottoming', anal. It can be nice. Some people really really really like it.
I know, that's not what I said though. I said the Romans did discriminate, against bottoms.
Yeah but it was more of a condition than a social wedge issue. Hierarchal toxic masculinity shit, not so much class persecution, and didn't in a lot of cases (I might be remembering a Greek thing, so easy to mix them up when roman culture is mostly a shitty port of Greek culture) topping/bottoming get based on age? Or did that not carry over?
Pics or it didn't happen... shit... AI...
It's not gay if you're giving a blowjob to a woman
Hey! I'm also a good Cristi...glug glug! Gargle gargle! Glug glug Christian!... sorry it's hard to talk with this big glug glug glug glug.
Apparently he's not just a good Christian, but a great one - he sucks AND swallows. A true Christian, a truly valuable person, is one who gives and enjoys physical sexual pleasure. Not someone who disdains human sexuality and disavows any human desires. It's all just sex - no labels are needed, it doesn't matter who is giving a blowjob to whom, as long as people are doing it and enjoying it. That's the only thing that matters.
"there's a video circulating". Not that I've seen. Sounds to me like more of one side just trying to slander the other.
Considering that Peter Schmidt the man accused of sucking another man’s penis admitted that he, Peter Schmidt, did indeed suck a penis I’m not sure what other evidence you need?
Would you be more likely to believe it if self-admitted cock gobbler Peter Schmidt slobbered all over your knob?
If he sucked my cock, yes, I would be more inclined to believe it than some anonymous meme on a site stating a video is circulating of him sucking a cock. I guess all you need is the meme.
Looks like two years old and potentially lies?
https://www.wbay.com/content/news/Shawano-County-Board-member-charged-with-strangling-farm-worker-566599091.html
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Schmidt_(Wisconsin_politician)
Read the political career section of the wiki article you linked. It contains info and links regarding the tweet posted by OP.
cant wait until there are thousands of AI generated videos of this shit.
Gonna be a great time to be alive. We'll see shit like "politician eats baby alive" or some shit. God i love internet, what a fucking place to be.
Yes, I also really want a future of misinformation where everything is shit and it's hard to find good information? What a great future that will be...
yeah, and that's what it's going to be.
We're already seeing shit that gets into that level of shit. It's only going to get worse. Politics is the prime example.
In some capacity, it'll be beneficial to society, because now you can trust nothing, you can assume nothing, and you have to take EVERYTHING at face value, otherwise you got pwned by some kid fucking around with an AI. Which given the amount of political misinformation, and just misinformation in general that we consume, and repeat to others. Would be a net positive i think.
Fascinated that people are down voting my original comment, but whatever, that's how the internet works. I like watching things burn because it forces people to give up their preconceptions, and i think that's when we're the most true to ourselves, the most authentic, genuine, and most socially functional.
Something i never really enjoyed was this weird sub behaviorism of some redditors to "reflexively downvote something because it's bad" The amount of comments i saw from people who would accidentally downvote a post calling out a rapist for example, was something else. Never thought i would see a time in my life, where people mindlessly consumed to the point where that was a genuine take that actually happened.
Videos are gonna be hard, it’ll take ages before AI can make a fully believable incriminating video.
Photos though? Yeah we already lost those. I don’t trust anything I see and people who do are in for a rough time.
have you forgotten the Tom Cruise deepfakes? Those are fantastic.
sora is doing pretty good, some cleanup editing on top and some structured environments will certainly do it. Need i remind you every expose video every is highly compressed? It's pretty easy to hide a lot of this shit. Though i also think it'll be a few years at least before videos are a big thing.
I'm more concerned if the worker had a chance to shower before receiving it. Imagine the funk if he had been working the farm all day and hadn't.
Maybe that's his thing.
Well if someone says it in a tweet, it must be true! Well, of course, only if it confirms what I already believe to be true!
You’re right that you can’t believe a screen shot of a tweet but this was all over the news when it happens as well.
The only thing I can come up with about his anti LGBTQ positions is that he checked a box that says he believes businesses have the right decline to work with things that conflict with their religious beliefs and they trans girls shouldn't compete in women's sports.
Now dont get me wrong, I strongly oppose one of these (denial of service) and the other im still on the fence about. But you really have to work to make this some hypocritical positions because you had sex with a man.
I've seen nothing that indicates hes very vocal on anti LGBTQ issues, let alone, as this tweet implies, one of the loudest.
So I'll go ahead and say the tweet is false, and if not, grossly misleading.
“He who shouts the loudest” is a common phrase used to indicate someone who is acting like a hypocrite. It does not mean they are literally the loudest anti LGBTQ representative out there. He is a member of the GOP which opposes rights for the LGBTQ community. That is what makes him a hypocrite.
Nothing in this tweet is misleading. I don’t expect you to agree with that though since your comment implies you don’t support trans rights (how the fuck is someone on the fence about another human having rights) and are likely a GOP voter anyway.
Agreed. But it implies a lot more than simply "acting like a hypocrite." It implies the person is constantly or vociferously condemning something. Not just one time checking a box.
The fact that you are turning to a baseless ad hominem and misrepresenting my position in order to claim that is why I won't agree just exposes how little faith you have in your position.
LOL! I love that you are in here acting like you are just being reasonable. If you are a member of the GOP, and gay, then you are a hypocrite.
Everyone can see your BS for what it is. I’ll bet you go around saying you are fiscally conservative but socially liberal too. Get out of here with your garbage.
I'm not sure I agree, but you are welcome to that opinion and it's besides the point. The point being that using the phrase "he who shouts loudest" for this guy is, at best, grossly misleading. The only positions I know about him are pretty mildly "anti gay" if you can even call them that at all... additionally, it doesn't even appear to be a big issue for him because I don't see him pushing it constantly.
Attacking me and making shit up about me because you need me to fit in some little box doesn't change this reality. Sorry.
You are fitting nicely into my “little box” all on your own. Anyway, I don’t really see any merit to this conversation anymore. Bye.
I won't look up more info (because I really don't want to), but isn't this an obvious candidate for AI generated video?
I won't look up actual facts I will just make stuff up to sound plausible in the thinnest margin and that's all I need to do. Because real life is just like court. Reasonable doubt is all we need!
well some other comments pointed out that it's 2 years old so deepfake video is much less likely. But if this was from the last few weeks I'd say this goes beyond reasonable doubt. In politics there's always going to be people with motives to destroy a politician they think is harmful (which in this case he really is, of course). I think scrutiny is needed in any case. But if there's no evidence for fakery, I don't care about "reasonable doubt" either.
Forgive me for not looking for a video of a man sucking another man's dick, that's not my kink. I don't want to read articles describing the act either, with the risk of embedding a still. I don't even live in the same country as this so I couldn't care less if he actually did it, I just thought it was weird this wasn't mentioned in the preceding comments.
I'm not asking you to do anything that has anything to do with anything sexual. I am asking you to simply provide any sort of credible evidence towards your accusations of it being a deep fake. If you have knowledge of deep fakes you surely know where to find evidence to back up your claims. Or show me how you think it's something other than the rape victims say it is.
Like I'm all for proving that an innocent person is innocent. But at least have something besides just yelling random crap that it could be. "It's a fake video" with no evidence is not productive nor is it accurate. It's the blatant attempts from a party that does not understand what logical thinking means.
You haven't even read the claims! Shut the fuck up.
Are you AI generated?
well, no, but you have no reason to believe me
I believe you
Come to think of it... You could be AI as well!
... Oh well, I'll allow it.
Haha I made this video using AI lol
I hate stories like this because it makes it seem like there's something wrong with being gay.
I get that we're supposed to dislike this guy because he's a hypocrite, but that's not what is written. What's written is "giving a blow job".
Am I just being I over-sensitive here?
If an avowed homophobe turns out to be gay, they should absolutely be called out for their hypocrisy.
I think pointing out the hypocrisy of these people is good overall. I don't think it is saying being gay and giving blow jobs as a man is bad. It is saying someone that is opposing the rights of gay people getting caught having some sort of gay sexual acts shows how ridiculous it is to be against the rights of others to be gay.
It just to show the hipocrisy. Republicans oppose everything homosexual but at the sane time show that it is something some still partake in. If anything, it shows that being a republican is hiding yourself. Giving a blowjob to men is what he opposes, but what he apparently enjoys. The blowjob itself is not the subject of the post.
Yes.
The shaming part is that he is gay / bi and is using his power to erase / subjugate the LGBTQ groups
He's a fucking hypocrite
I mean, the power dynamic here of having sexy times with your employee isn't great either.
Yes, you’re being overly sensitive here.
The negative thing on display isn’t the blowjob, it’s the harm he causes to others while himself engaging in the very acts he attacks.
No, there is something wrong with being a hypocrite
Yes. It's pointing out the hypocrisy of the oxygen theif.
you are completely misrepresenting the story... the entire point is that he is a hypocrite, the fact that he is a hypocrite about being gay is completely irrelevant
If some idiot spent his life trying to make rollercoasters illegal, and then was photographed on a roller coaster have a great time, what moral value would you give to "Anti-coaster polician caught on video riding coaster."
The headline is highlighting that the guy is a hypocrite. If it just said "Politician is a Hypocrite." Basically everyone would be like "wtf is this article is about? How is he a hypocrite? Who wrote this uninformative headline?
I think I'm thinking "lefties don't like him already; it doesn't matter if he gave a BJ or not, it doesn't matter if he's a hypocrite or not. Right-wingers will see the headline and their takeaway will be 'gross, he's gay' and the hypocrisy will be of minor importance."
So I think your rollercoasters example is not the same in my mind. But maybe it is the same and I'm just being weird about this. Most people seem to think so from the answers I've had :)
You aren't wrong that a small minority of people will see that line and think 'eww gross" and while that's shitty in principle, it's a reader problem, not a headline problem.
I think so. It's the double standards and the gross hypocrisy that make the story.
I don't know, without the religious fruitcake stuff he sounds like a cool dude.
I didn't even think about him being gay, or connote it with being gay.
It's like you missed the context completely. What is also written is "who opposes LGBT"
I will take the hot take devil's advocate position, and mostly agree with this. I'm not sure it really does too much to call out these clowns for their hypocrisy, other than make everyone sort of, feel better about their own preconcieved political dispositions, and dunk on a homophobe. The people who support these freaks are operating on a different sort of framework. Often it's not straight up denialism as much as it is like, some sort of idiotic conception about the fall of western culture, or about god punishing the wicked from some shit that's stupidly cited in leviticus, or paul being an asexual rapture doomer.
I think the only way that this is really like, blown, bu dum tsss, blown up into a larger issue, right, at least, for libs, rather than being like, a one-off easy dunk case, is if we maybe extrapolate that all, or a large portion, of these homophobic crusaders is also just super closeted gay dudes. I don't know whether or not that's the case, like disproportionately, right, but I think it's probably not good to sort of, operate on that assumption, or extrapolate this to be the case, based on these kinds of incidents. I dunno, guys, he could be bisexual, he could be bi. This would be typical bisexual behavior, honestly. And, is it gay to be bisexual, fellas?
In any case, I mostly hate this dude more for the fact that he's a homophobic shitbag, more than the fact that he's giving someone a blowie. The blowie is probably his best quality, I would say. You think his head game is strong, or not? Be honest now, I don't wanna hear that his political views prevent him from giving good head, if that were the case then bipolar sacred geometry crystal girlfriends would be out of business.
People seem to have weirdly missed that the person he sexually assaulted was an employee of his farm. Would you like your job to depend on receiving your boss' secret blowjobs? (Quit answering yes you fucking perverts!)
He isn't just a hypocrit, like all
Republicanspoliticiansrich people he abuses his power to extract whatever demeaning things he wants from other people, starting with their underpriced labor and apparently moving on to also extracting their seed directly as well.Unless you have information that isn't in this tweet, it doesn't say that it's not consensual or that his workers are underpaid.
The power dynamic in this 'relationship' is definitely icky but not necessarily sexual assault