Google's new AI search results promotes sites pushing malware, scams
(In the case that someone in Lemmy still use Google)
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/google/googles-new-ai-search-results-promotes-sites-pushing-malware-scams/Open linkView original on lemmy.ml600
Comments49
Here the funny part, google knew this shit would happen. How you ask? Well, see google has had this problem for a long time.
When google first came out, there was all sorts of techniques you could use to boost your PageRank. Google had to tweak and tweak and tweak to fix it so that nazi sites would not come up when you looked up Jewish holocaust memorial museums for example.
Seems they’ve learned nothing. And yet they’re still one of the biggest tech companies in the world.
Scary. Let’s add AI to the mix now.
At least they haven't used ChaosGPT for this.
Goethe - The Sorcerer's Apprentice
Oh yes they learned. This is now a feature, not a bug. Google's slogan changed long ago.
What to use for search engine. Even ddg is not giving reliable results.
If you believe Google is the most reliable, you can still use it in a private way via :
https://www.startpage.com/
There's plenty of public instances too https://searx.space/
Couple of public instances too. Basically SearxNG with ONLY google as a source. https://github.com/benbusby/whoogle-search#public-instances
I'm pretty sure Startpage got sold out to an ad company. I think the best option is just to use SearxNG
They do, but it's still separated from that business. At worse, it's more an ethical issue of using something that an Ad company own, exactly like using Google with or without proxies services. https://web.archive.org/web/20210118031008/https://blog.privacytools.io/relisting-startpage/
Thank you
Any alternative to Google Alerts?
Long time looking for such service which monitors web for keywords.
I've been happy with Kagi. It's for-pay but it's quality to me.
It’s just a bit too expensive imo.
For something I use constantly every day $10 is nothing
but for something you never use $10 is quite a lot.
$5/mo. If that's too pricey deal with shit 🤷♂️.
That's fair. Like the sibling comment says, it's worth it for me. But not everyone has the ability to pay.
The old saying goes: if you don't pay for the product, you are the product.
Yeah, still too expensive tho
Yeah, but $10 a month is a lot. And the $5 plan for only 300 searches a month goes by really fast if you have to do any kind of research for anything. Even for trying to figure out what brand of something to buy, you blow through those searches super quick.
Yup, I'd pay maybe $1. That's way more than the ad revenue search engines get, so it's a more than reasonable price to pay.
And where did you come up with this info? Source? Do you really think that search engine ad revenue (for the engine itself, not what one measly advertiser gets back) tops out at "way below" $1 per person?
In 2023, Google's ad search revenue amounted to 175 billion U.S. dollars.
That includes way more than search:
I couldn't find a reliable source for a breakdown, so I'll use Microsoft Bing statistics instead:
That last number is really close to my $1/month figure.
So something around $1/month range seems like a fair replacement for ad revenue for a search engine.
They've said that it costs them 1.5 cents to answer a search query, so that dollar a month wouldn't go very far. I probably incidentally run 40-50 searches a day between my devices... $10 is a value that works for me.
I've been using Kagi as my default since June, and don't plan on stopping anytime soon.
That sounds unlikely... But they're a small search provider with a small customer base, so costs will be high maintaining all the infrastructure needed.
As I linked elsewhere, Bing makes ~$10 per user per year. That's really close to my $1/month figure. And that's revenue, which doesn't count advertiser acquisition costs and whatnot.
I'm unwilling to pay $5/month for limited searches, but I'm willing to pay for search if it's reasonable.
Well, it costs Kagi about 1.5 cents to answer a search query. Consider how many searches you use in a month to determine how much they're making off you at $10/mo.
I'm lucky enough to be in a position to be able to pay for products that I use, instead of relying on freemium, or ad-supported, or data-mined, or pirated products. That hasn't always been the case for me, so I don't judge anyone for making a different choice.
Same here, happy Kagi subscriber 👍
I use mainly Andisearch, also has AI but relay on reliable sources (and one of the most privat search out there), Startpage and Whoogle use the old Google search engine, Mojeek also is fine, Groot search has a own search index, Etools a Suiss made Metasearch engine and some more. In the Vivaldi Forum you'll find the, maybe, most complete list of search engines you can try.
Whoa! You weren't kidding about that list of search engines. What's with the Germans and search engines? They sure do have a lot.
The author of th Thread is German, he icluded because of this also searches in German media sites or dictionaries. But if you want a German search engine, you can use MetaGer, not bad at all. Good privacy but freemium, in the free version there are ads, (context, anonymous) and limited on 2 search engines.
Hah! I in fact have been using metager for a couple of months now as my defult search engine, since I saw it recommended in Lemmy those 2 months ago. Works great. Tried kagi before but I just don't search that much and paying per search makes much more sense to me.
DDG queries can't really be written the same way you'd write one in Google if you're after effective results. It'll take some time to get used to it, tbh I was using DDG alongside Google until I fully switched.
I keep reading that Google’s search results are supposedly much better than DDG’s when my experience is the exact opposite. I don’t even live in an English speaking country and the results I get are a vast improvement over Google’s. It has been this way for me since at least last year, but in my experience DDG had caught up to Google in 2022 already. It could also be that Google has just deteriorated a lot in the last two years (which it definitely has, judging by all the bad publicity they’ve been getting for it), so I’d urge you to give DDG/Brave Search/Bing/Kagi/SearxNG another chance.
I’d also recommend setting an alternative of your choice as the default everywhere and to use it exclusively for like a week before making up your mind about that specific product!
Do you mean grammar-wise, or special operators?
Grammar, I've noticed I get much better results if I word things more directly instead of like a question
I've never used questions to search, I use keywords, even with Google. So if I want info on the Russia-Ukraine war, I'll search "Russia-Ukraine War". If I want casualty numbers, I'll add "casualties" there, probably at the start if I want to emphasize it. Searching "how many people have died in the ukraine war" has never been something I do.
That said, natural language search may be more useful with AI tools though, but for regular search, I've always used keyword-dense queries, roughly ordered by priority in the query (important terms first).
They probably mean grammar, since most Google operators do work. If there's a specific difference in search syntax (other than bangs) though, I'd love to know what I've been missing.
Kagi. It's better here.
Not sure who's down voting you, its quite a valid option that, unlike google, is actually innovating in interesting ways.
Google: "Hey, do not be evil."
Google years later: "Can I has all the profits and personal data?”
Google after that: " I am the Lizard Queen!"
The same assholes riding a new horse and as usual everyone wants to blame the horse.
Way to go killing the golden goose there Google
I…. Don’t really get why they think this is better. Google search was good…. Other companies can copy AI technology anyway. AI is really just predicting words and wasn’t designed for search, but their old algorithm was.
Whyyyyyy
My theory is that Google wants to move towards vector symbolic representations for pages in search rather than page caching. It would make index storage and retrival orders of magnitude cheaper for them if they can design a scheme that works well.
Google hasn't been dogfooding in a long time have they? I wonder what products Googlers use.
So it operates exactly like Google search? Yall are surprised?
So it's working as intended?
In a move that suprise la no one....
Also it doesn't know shit about combos in super double dragon.
Hell's attorneys are seriously lacking. I've been waiting for them to sue Google for DMCA violations 🤣.
I have it on and use it just to see how terrible it is tbh, I get a laugh at how inaccurate it is every time 😂